« first day (2340 days earlier)      last day (2976 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

17:02
Hi all happy new year to one part of the world and advanced happy birthday to other who are yet to change the date.I have a question which is related to this
happy birthday?
Human error
@user285oo6 ask away!
While listening to my playlist i press enter the track changes and so i get a notification but in the notification side bar at the right when i click that i keep getting history of tracks played again
Dog
Dog
@user285oo6 Umm what
@Rahul2001 zoom ftw
@Burgi cat
@Dog for example lets say im listening to Faded song by allen walker so iget a notification of the same,next i switch to heathens suicide squad i get that notification as well.The problem is that there's a notification shown in the side bar so i click that and again the notification of faded appears next heathens so on so forth.these historical notifications keep changing automatically
Dog
Dog
17:13
@user285oo6 It's new years everywhere already
@Dog ya but half part of the world celebrated already
Yep, about 11 hours past it here
I hope y'all are enjoying 2017 so far
So is it a good question to be posted in su or its better answered here-This depends on the no of songs switched if I switch 12 songs then the history of 12 tracks keeps appearing automatically on clicking the notification
@user285oo6 It might be good to ask on SU, but you need to give more information. Firstly it's not clear if this is a desktop computer, laptop, tablet or what so that would be good to know. What operating system? What program are you using to play your playlist? What exact behaviour are you getting in a step-by-step fashion (your current description is unclear)? What behaviour do you want/expect?
@bwDraco You still harping on the AMD bandwagon? Everyone else abandoned them years ago... ;)
17:20
lol
They make console processors now...
I'm kinda tied to NVIDIA for graphics, but 100% willing to consider AMD for CPUs at this point.
@Mokubai its a win10 lappy
@bwDraco For performance on a budget I'd consider AMD, and probably recommend it to people who "just want to do stuff", but for actual performance I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole.
We'll see when the Ryzen processors are actually released.
17:23
@user285oo6 Fair enough, then ask away.
@bwDraco Problem is that it's taken them 5 years to catch up and just be ready to match current top-end processors. Chances are that Intel could release a new line up the week after that puts them back in the dirt...
Also they also probably found the absolute best chip they could to do competitive benchmarking with, they might have problems with yields for higher clock rates that makes it difficult to release the highest speeds.
Intel have their high-end chips pretty solidly in-market already.
I want the competitiveness as it'll drive the price of Intels high-end down, but I wait to be convinced.
i like AMD...
well i liked ATI but AMD will have to do
i wonder if this lacie drive is USB 3
I like AMD/ATI, but I think it's going to be a lot of work to turnaround the market domination that Intel have.
17:38
ugh
i went to close another tab but did cmd Q instead of cmd W
Over the last year, AMD did see some success capturing a nontrivial portion of the mainstream gaming market with the Polaris GPUs. We'll see if they can compete in the high end again with Vega.
quick n00bish question...
why do CDs and DVDs fill up from the middle outwards?
17:53
@Burgi fastest access at centre
hdds do too
@Burgi cuz there are different sizes?
This way the same drive will work
@Rahul2001 that is a good point
no its not
i prefer your answer though @djsmiley2k
sry, but its only logical
17:55
@Mokubai what should be the title Absurd notifcations of mp3 played or Repetitve notifications of mp3 files
@djsmiley2k so is mine :/
XD
no, you'rs is ONLY logical, haha that's my point :D
why read from the center? because you know where it is
Logic is love. Logic is life.
why write to the center first? because its fastest here
@Rahul2001 when they invented them i don't think they planned for different sizes
17:56
hmmmmmmm i think the big red book did
or might be the black one
i might ask it on the main site
@Burgi there were different gramaphone record sizes also, I think
@Burgi you'll get a lot of rep from the question
You'll probably make it to HNQ :-)
@Rahul2001 12" and 6"
The Rainbow Books are a collection of Compact Disc format specifications. == Red Book (1980) == CD-DA (Digital Audio) – standardized as IEC 60908 CD-Text – a 1996 extension to CD-DA CD+G (plus Graphics) – karaoke CD+EG / CD+XG (plus Extended Graphics) – an extension of CD+G == Green Book (1986) == CD-i (Interactive) == Yellow Book (1988) == CD-ROM (Read-Only Memory) – standardized as ECMA-130 and ISO/IEC 10149 CD-ROM XA (eXtended Architecture) – a 1991 extension of CD-ROM == Orange Book (1990) == Orange is a reference to the fact that red and yellow mix to orange. This correlates wi...
17:58
but they go from the outside inwards
its all there
dont do that @user285oo6
people will answer if they know
@djsmiley2k don't do what? oh the question i shared the link here for any more changes to be made if any
@djsmiley2k plz check if it's clear and provide any inputs for changes to be made
see, say that before posting the link :P
18:05
0
Q: Why do CDs and DVDs fill up from the centre outwards?

BurgiI recently had to burn a DVD for the first time in ages and I was wondering why do CDs and DVDs fill up their data from the middle outwards. Previous disc based media like vinyl records went from the outside, towards the centre so it couldn't have been for historical reasons. I am looking for g...

shameless post
probably already DV'd and flagged as a dupe
@user285oo6 "absurd" is a rather useless subjective word, "repetitive" and perhaps "unwanted" gives more of an idea about the problem.
+1. Hard drives also write from the outside in.
Annnnnnnnnd I asnwered again
@djsmiley2k don't make me edit your answer for spelling
hmmm did more research, i r wrong
sorry @Rahul2001 you win this one
18:12
I am drafting an answer. Hang on...
@djsmiley2k XD
@Rahul2001 we will fight again young one :P
he is young, has more women than us and is cleverer than us. is there a reason not to hate @Rahul2001?
3
Lol
I'm not that sure about the cleverer part
you have more rep than me
18:20
Different sizes was the first thing that popped into my mind when I read you message though
@Burgi um, okay, that's true I suppose...
But probably because I ask and answer popular questions
but they couldn't have known that when they made the first one
the size thing doesn't really make sense tho
Kinda does, but yeah, couldn't have been the reason for filling up from the center
this "mega-rep" has failed to materialise
meh
0
A: Why do CDs and DVDs fill up from the centre outwards?

bwDracoThis is intended to allow for discs of different sizes. The standard optical disc today is 12 cm in diameter. Historically, optical media have been produced in a wide variety of sizes; the LaserDiscs of the 1970s and 1980s were made in 30 cm, 20 cm, and 12 cm sizes. More recently, CDs, DVDs, and...

15 minutes late, but better explanation.
18:42
damn good answer
WHAT IS THIS I SHOULD HAVE ANSWERED I WAS RIGHT DAMNIT
but counter to that is your point that HDD fill up from the outside in and they use a similar reading head that vinyl did
i'll leave the question open for a day or two
@bwDraco And incorrect :)
@Rahul2001 You are wrong :)
0
A: Why do CDs and DVDs fill up from the centre outwards?

DavidPostillWhy do CDs and DVDs fill up their data from the middle outwards? The other answers, which explain the reasoning is due to different disk sizes, are not entirely accurate. There is an exception to the rule, namely the XBox. Xbox games have the data written from the outside in for performance rea...

Updating the answer, hang on...
@DavidPostill but... What's the actual reason for most? You only tell us the reason for the exception
18:48
@Rahul2001 So? I'm pointing out an issue with the other answers - they are not entirely correct :)
wow...
nooooo
Dog
Dog
!!caaaaaaat
@DavidPostill is that a proper answer though?
18:49
i've fracking nuked another damn pendrive
@Burgi how so?
the MBR silliness of yesterday
I'm not too sure the answer is completely wrong...
Updated answer.
@DavidPostill: This doesn't make the answer fundamentally wrong. The question (incorrectly) assumes that all optical media are read inside-out, and the answer is based on this assumption.
@Rahul2001 It's an answer. Maybe not a complete answer, but it's still an answer.
Fair enough
18:59
@Rahul2001 I've updated it to point out the inaccurate assumption in the question :)
hmm...
Dog
Dog
19:14
Derp
Goodnight! Long day tomorrow
Good night
Dog
Dog
Australia built a big fence.
@DavidPostill you don't actually answer...
the exception exists because writing to the outside is faster, fair enough
but why do they by default write inside out?
@Dog now we know where Trump got the idea
19:20
is 80 mile beach actually 80 miles long?
is AU too using the "dead king based" unit system?
i think in general australia uses the metric system
Dog
Dog
@tereško problem is, Trump wants to keep out Mexicans, not rabbits
maybe he's trying to keep americans in :D
he needs one across the two northern borders then
19:26
2?
Oh, russia?
and the skies
and seas
needs a dome.
there are two borders with canada
Alaska should just make it their own country
@Burgi is there?
is it that small lake that seperates the two?
main USA - canada and alaska - canada
hmmmmm
oh right
is alaska completely seperate? I've never looked closely
19:28
yes
:O
why is it not just a seperate country XD
hawaii is also separate
I know about hawaii
but that's by a sea
the USA bought alaska from russia for 1billion USD
19:30
:O
I dont think it was that costly.
wqhy o_O
@jokerdino well. Hawaii was a separate country, before USA annexed it
Why would anyone ever buy something that spawned Sarah Palin o_O
How did Alaska become part of the United States?
The land that became Alaska came into U.S. possession in 1867, when William Seward, secretary of state under President Andrew Johnson, negotiated a deal to buy the 586,000-square-mile area from Russia for $7.2 million, less than 2 cents per acre.
That was before oil was a thing.
19:31
yeah
@djsmiley2k they even paid by cheque: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/…
welp, he got a good deal
i don't think the people at the time thought so
YAY! i went HNQ!!!!
hgah well hopefully we get a real answer
honestly i expected @DavidPostill to just go "heres the reason complete with a million supporting links"
or "flagged as dupe"
19:47
And I think this is teh real answer 'Unlike on a DVD or CD-ROM, there are no "files" on a Red Book audio CD; there is only one continuous stream of LPCM audio data,'
imagine the seak time on a 20 minute long cd
you've got to seek through the 50 or so unused minutes first
how to avoid it? always start in the middle
what is virtual super resolution?
a what?
exactly
I know what a virtual resolution is
but not a super one :O
it has an S on its chest
19:51
LOL
there are some big fireworks being set off
@Burgi, congratulations: your question has indeed made it to Hot Network Questions
20:07
thanks
btw your answer is the best one so far
i was just thinking, this macpple top is like the LEM in apollo 13
it does everything brilliantly other than landing on the moon
20:30
@Burgi Answer updated.
afk - watching Sherlock :)
20:53
@Burgi supersampling basically. Original renders at higher res than your screen, then gets downsampled with a high quality resizing algorithm
what is the point?
All current gen Mac products do it, and so do many iPhones depending on the application (in OpenGL/Metal you get the unadulterated raw framebuffer of the real screen)
@Burgi rendering the original at higher quality and then downsampling provides a sharper image than rendering at a lower quality originally
And by quality I mean resolution
hmmm.... worth doing?
I've done tests and have screenshots in this channel of Star Citizen with my old GTX 980, both super sampled and not supersampled
Search for VSR or supersampling and you should be able to find it
righto
20:56
I did the tests when my rig was a GTX 980 with a 1920x1080 screen
I'm envious :\
Hopefully, this new PC can happen soon
May 24 '16 at 5:36, by allquixotic
two 1080p renders from Star Citizen's hangar, very high quality, GTX 980:
i've got quite old screens and for whatever reason this option has never been there before
May 24 '16 at 5:38, by allquixotic
still, if you look at the metal cockpit structural elements going diagonally across the screen, it's pretty obvious that the 4k image is much smoother... and that's not jpeg artifacts because the 1080p one is way worse
until the reinstall
21:01
do you see the difference? the reduced jaggies?
it's clear on the hard edges of the cockpit in the screenshots there
it's kinda like, if you have a sound card with a native capture sample rate of 22050 Hz, and you record audio like that, it's going to sound noticeably worse than if you capture at a native rate of 44100 Hz and downsample to 22050 in post-processing
yeah i understand
smart algorithms can retain some of the information from the "wider" resolution original when converting to a smaller format
I am still stuck with a 780M and the only thing I can do about it is overclock :\
Two generations behind and no upgrade path aside from replacing the whole laptop with a desktop *sigh*
@bwDraco well, I have a 980 and an i7-3770K and 32 gigs of RAM and a Z77 mobo and a case sitting downstairs in a corner because my dad is too lazy / too stubborn to figure out how to upgrade his system properly
but he's such a packrat that he won't let me sell it
so say if i turn it on for my screens and my screen natively is 640x480 at 2x sampling the gfx card is actually rendering 1280x960?
21:08
it'll probably sit there and rot until it's either corroded or obsolete because he's too stupid to figure out how to take advantage of $1500 worth of hardware just sitting there that could be money in my pocket
and it's not like he's never built a PC before; we've been doing this - both of us - since I was a little kid
@allquixotic lol
@Burgi yeah, the GPU renders to a buffer in VRAM that's 1280x960 wide, then it applies a parallelizable rescaling algorithm on the GPU to quickly downsample it to 640x480 and writes that out to your GPU's front buffer (which gets copied by the firmware to your display controller, and the monitor)
This is the first time I am actually building a PC from scratch. I have installed and replaced computer parts before, but nothing more complicated than installing an AMD processor in a PGA-ZIF socket.
@allquixotic does that put additional strain on the card? as it is having to worktwice as hard?
@Burgi that's where you're wrong; don't get tripped up by that... do the actual mathematics... multiply 640 by 480, then multiply 1280 by 960, and divide the two numbers you get out
21:12
@bwDraco its easy, computers these days are just like lego. everything just slots together
1280x960 has four times the pixels of 640x480, so the GPU has to do four times more work
2
so yes, if you have a 1920x1080 "Full HD" monitor and you turn on 4K supersampling / VSR, your GPU is doing as much work as if you had a 4K monitor, which is four times more
hmm...
so if your GPU gives you 48 FPS at 1920x1080, it'll give you 12 FPS at 4K
or you'll need four of your original GPUs in SLI and hope the SLI scaling works ideally (hint: it won't), or a GPU four times as powerful
@allquixotic Not necessarily. Some games scale better than others, and there are tricks to reduce the performance hit of higher resolutions.
is it worth doing on older screens?
21:14
@bwDraco well yeah, there are "tricks" you can do, but most of those tricks involve a compromise in quality
@allquixotic If you have a 1080p display and a very powerful GPU, DSR is worth a shot.
generally speaking, as far as the problem is concerned, the most efficient an algorithm can be is linear, because it has to visit each pixel at least once
if you have an algorithm that's faster than linear, it's cutting corners on quality
and many algorithms are much slower than linear, meaning 4 times the resolution costs more than 4 times the compute time
@allquixotic The ROPs work four times as hard, but that does not mean the TMUs or shader cores are doing 4x the work.
@bwDraco if they're not, then you're not getting true 4K quality, like I said
think back to your Algorithms class in undergrad CS
don't think about individual algorithms; think about the problem space
if you have X number of pixels, how many pixels do you have to decide an individual color value for?
the answer is X, obviously, right?
so if you increase X by a multiple of 4, how many pixels do you have to decide an individual colorvalue for?
4X.
I understand computational complexity, but it isn't necessarily that simple. The computational complexity of mapping a texture to a bunch of polygons does not necessarily scale linearly with resolution. Actually rendering the output, sure.
21:19
okay, sure, there are clearly certain operations that can grow slower than linear when dealing with rendering.... as a trivial example, an algorithm to divide the screen in half... should be constant time, regardless of the number of pixels
but enough of the actual rendering task is linear or worse that the real-world performance requirements are pretty close to linear with the number of pixels
we're lucky it's only linear, because plenty of advanced DSP algorithms are slower than linear with trivial implementations; they've had to work very hard to reign those in back to linearish
Hmm...
Also, consider the role of the CPU and the draw calls it makes.
I guess it depends on the game, what types of rendering eye candy it does, and whether you hit a bottleneck in CPU or RAM or the PCIe bus before maxing out your shader cores
but at least with things like Star Citizen that are GPU bound for just about everybody, you get this nice linear scale of FPS vs. # of pixels
I definitely did with my GTX 980
Father's replacing his desktop soon and we expect to be getting a detachable laptop or a tablet (see hardwarerecs.stackexchange.com/q/6575) but other options are still on the table, including a low-cost desktop/laptop + tablet combination. If it is going to be a desktop, we may go down the custom building path.
I, on the other hand, will be building a new desktop soon, but the parts to be selected are not yet finalized (Kaby Lake or Zen?)
21:48
...and here we go. I'm getting a flood of upvotes.
Just over two hours left to hit the rep cap.
I knew right from the start that the question would hit HNQ.
4 hours ago, by bwDraco
You'll probably make it to HNQ :-)
22:02
i won't hit rep cap
hehehe
...and I have just rep-capped.
22:21
@bwDraco Congrats :)
@Burgi BTW Dual Layer DVDs may be (mostly are?) written in both directions - A movie will be split across across the layers, so no seek back to the inner edge is needed at the layer change.
this gets more and more interesting
i don't think i've ever bought a dual layer DVD-R
@Burgi So for historical reasons writing from the inside makes sense (different size disks) but for read performance reasons modern disks may be written outside in or in both directions. Note most disks are a standard size.
nods
Dog
Dog
22:39
!! Caat
Dog
Dog
Dual layer cat.
halfway!
wow... i just realised something...
20 upvotes and no DVs
is this off-topic?
-2
Q: How should I store/backup the videos from my phone?

Miserable VariableI realize there are many options. I would really like to know how other (super)users do it, but I can't even figure out good places to ask this question. Hopefull I will get some good responses here. Feel free to describe what you do, and to point at other resources. So...what do you do with th...

@Burgi It's an overly-broad opinion-based question and it primarily involves a phone (a PC is not integral to the question).
i'm on a flag ban at the moment so i can't do anything
interestingly i can still flag comments
22:59
@Burgi Another aside on your question. Commercially manufactured CDs and DVDs are not written at all - they are stamped.
THATS A GOOD POINT
WTF>>>STICKYKEYS GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
!!/tell 34493275 e_rofl
well that was annoying
the person who thought sticky keys were a good idea needs taking outside and shot
Dog Mauls Owners After They Tried To Dress Him In Sweater huffingtonpost.com/entry/… Dont make this about "pitBulls" any dog could fight you when dealing with fassion accessories :-) just because the pitbull will WIN the fight
23:12
@Burgi Flagged for discrimination against differently abled people ;)
> Flying High Become intimate with an airship
@Burgi lol. That's a new one :)
I know it's a joke, but not everyone will interpret it as intended.
hmmm?
sorry i missed what you typed
@bwDraco dirgiblephilia is not a joke
its real!
the love between a man and his blimp is sacred
@Burgi He was referring to the comment I didn't flag ;)
About shooting someone ...
23:27
hopefully not someone in a zepplin! ;)
speaking of flying high.... i wonder how my minion is getting on in amsterdam
btw with reference to the prosseco experiment yesterday.
it worked brilliantly especially when couple with the gift of a giant panda
@Burgi lol. eats shoots leaves?
@DavidPostill i... i didn't think of that joke...
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (2340 days earlier)      last day (2976 days later) »