Laptop colors are way off to the point where ColorMunki is seriously distorting the black point and darker colors to get the brighter colors right. I cannot trust this laptop's display for color-critical work any more. The Acer IPS monitor is able to produce accurate colors, though.
It does not help that RGB cannot be adjusted at the display itself via ADC or otherwise.
The software was able to command the Acer display to change some of the settings and calibrated to a color-accurate state.
Not the laptop display, though.
I don't know what panel this is but the delta-E on the blues and greens seems to be so high that it's uncorrectable without seriously distorting darker colors.
As far as I know, the panel was designed for near-total coverage of the NTSC YIQ (or perhaps YUV) color space. Darker sRGB colors seem to be completely out of gamut for the display.
I might just have to forgo calibration of the laptop display. It's just not made to display sRGB correctly.
I can try to calibrate it to NTSC to see if this is indeed the case.
It seems the laptop's display panel is designed for the wrong color space.
in brief i've been getting emails for a couple of days saying: Someone attempted to sign in to your Yahoo account from an app that doesn't meet Yahoo's security standards. We blocked this sign-in attempt, which was made on: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:39 BST from United Kingdom.
I'm going to try another color calibration program. The colorimeter itself can't possibly be wrong; it seems that the delta-E for deep greens is so high that it's confusing the ColorMunki software.
The calibration system had no trouble with getting the color on a known good IPS display correct.
I'm going to see if I can get some delta-E measurements from DisplayCAL tomorrow.
For the past couple of days I have been receiving emails from Yahoo claiming they have stopped unauthorised access to my account.
Someone attempted to sign in to your Yahoo account from an app that doesn't meet Yahoo's security standards. We blocked this sign-in attempt, which was made on:
...
So I've been looking around the communities Meta StackOverflow and Meta StackExchange, but wasn't able to find something that I think directly answers my concern. I've made a simple design that is based on the StackOverflow logo, and currently planning to have it printed. It's a spoof/parody desi...
It should be fair use. I dont see why it would be in any copyright infringement. the Logo is drastically changed yet people will still get the idea of what its referred to.
@hubot Uhm. Y'know, it's technically the bottom of the current range, but you're basing your opinion off what was probably the first Atom ever released.
I'm just going to use DisplayCAL and Argyll CMS at this point. I can't trust the ColorMunki software to correctly calibrate the display if it's getting the darker colors wrong.
@Rahul2001 Tested it on a Note 5. Works to get into safemode is a little different but it does allow you to open up apps that were open that do not show up when in safe mode.
and android has significantly better market penetration, and since it has a phone-heritage, dosen't have all the stuff that makes linux powerful and confusing for a non technical person
Oh, I should warn you: ASP.NET has some stupid unsafe-chars filtering at the page level in an attempt to protect against SQL injection... which rejects some passwords. You might want to disable that, if your queries are safe.
In both queries 1 and 2, the text from the textbox is inserted into the database. What's the significance of the parameterized query here?
1.>-------------
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("INSERT INTO dbo.Cars " +"VALUES(@TagNbr);" , conn);
cmd.Parameters.Add("@TagNbr", SqlDbType.Int);
cmd.Pa...
You can also use this, that is more simple. The only think that you need to set is the YourDataBaseName
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ConnStringDb1" connectionString="Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=YourDataBaseName;Integrated Security=True;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
<
Some people prefer using mixed mode authentication i guess.. If they want to give external access to an instance without having a network account having a sql server local login still allows them to access a db.
I dont recommend it though.. NT Authentication all the way imo.
@Bob: Not really.. Users wouldnt have access to see any objects that are present within the database other than maybe a couple stored procedures granted by specific application roles.. a login procedure.. potentially some IUD procedures that take in some paramters to write data to tables that arent accessible or apparently visible by anybody if someone was able to directly access the database.)
@GuitarShoeDave I suppose that makes more sense when you have a limited number of (ad) users... with different privileges
Not so much for a public website?
@Burgi uhm. What I'd do is... well, webserver talks to sql server with a static user stored in a config. Doesn't matter if it's nt auth or not. All website users use the same credentials for database access.
In this scenario the db is purely there to support the webserver
But the problem is if you have one 'application user'.. it would need grant access to all the stored procedures in your database... which compromises the database if that application user account was figured out (given the database is listening on an egress interface and not loopback / localhost only)
For the past couple of days I have been receiving emails from Yahoo claiming they have stopped unauthorised access to my account.
Someone attempted to sign in to your Yahoo account from an app that doesn't meet Yahoo's security standards. We blocked this sign-in attempt, which was made on:
...
In both queries 1 and 2, the text from the textbox is inserted into the database. What's the significance of the parameterized query here?
1.>-------------
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("INSERT INTO dbo.Cars " +"VALUES(@TagNbr);" , conn);
cmd.Parameters.Add("@TagNbr", SqlDbType.Int);
cmd.Pa...
You can also use this, that is more simple. The only think that you need to set is the YourDataBaseName
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ConnStringDb1" connectionString="Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=YourDataBaseName;Integrated Security=True;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
<
