In setting up the "other" win7 computer and turning stuff off, i am noticing some items are not there. The other computer has more updates, and it looks like they changed stuff, disabled stuff that is presentaly "off" and consolidated some things. Other than it being different , that is looking like an improvement.
I was trying to get down to completely disabling the file encryption ability (i dont use) and the remote operation ability (i dont want) and at least a few items in those have changed, , , wonder.
freak, did they have to call it pascal :-) there are already other uses for that word (that i avoid) programming language, pressure unit ,even an island . PacSal wasnt being used :-)
familiarity breeds contempable web search results.
They've probably designed the presentation to mention Pascal last. The more anticipation, the better. Announcing it now is going to cost them viewer interest—and some of their sales.
Demo the functionality it enables first, then the underlying technology.
A lot of psychology goes into these marketing events. You can't afford not to optimize for every last dollar.
Losing the interest of the audience in an event like this translates directly into lost sales.
(For a while, they've had xx4 for gaming and xx0 for flagship, but not xx2 since the Tesla generation.)
In any case, it's time to upgrade.
Let's see how AMD responds. Unlike NVIDIA, AMD will be targeting the mainstream segment with Polaris and handle the high end later with Vega; this was probably the right call for AMD to make.
i want to see the reviews from real owners after 3mo of use , and actual pictures of the renders from those analists who spot cheap trickery. or $600 extra spending cash whichever comes sooner :-)
ya figure with all this parelleling going on unlike a cpu where single thread performance is (still) very important, they could run mucho more parellel processes at a lower voltages = lower power, to infinity and beyond :-) then just have super fast memory connect, which already is pretty dang fast.
But then add whatever insanity they accomplished to clock it that way too, and keep the power use down, and that is just weird.
just reducing the transister size , from what i been seeing is about a 20% max reduction in power and 8-10% max speed changes. (all approx) which alone is cool.
funny thing is, even if I plan to get a laptop with a Thunderbolt 3 connector and external GPU dock, getting the GTX 1080 when it comes out will still be worth it
near-term I can stick it in my desktop; long-term it goes in a laptop dock
it'll be faster than anything they can fit in a laptop until the next generation architecture (at least; maybe even the next process node)
someone should really do a small and sleek dock for a single dual-slot GPU that attaches nicely to your laptop without adding a gigantic amount of bulk
not something you'd want on your lap, but small for travel purposes
@Bob I see it as being less of a problem for 150 - 180 W cards; existing fan tech can easily dissipate the heat from cards drawing that amount of power
if you're talking 250 - 300 W cards, then yeah, you need case fans to help out
the natural physics of air won't allow a small bubble of hot air to build up around the card even if you have no other forces moving air around in your room
perhaps they could design the GPU enclosure to have a small passive heatsink or heat spreader that you can install by adjusting it and fitting it to the card so that it makes contact with the hottest part of the card? idk
I cut the engines and deliberately stalled it (badly) at around 8 km altitude, which by throwing the body of the aircraft into the airstream, killed my airspeed... then I went nose-down, pulled out of the stall, gained a ton of speed, then flared it off slowly as I got closer to the ground
then I monitored my vertical speed and kept tapping the pitch control to keep vertical speed between 5 and 10 m/s until nearing the ground
then pitched up a bit more and impacted the ground at about 5 m/s, which didn't destroy anything
it took me about the distance between Sydney and Bathurst (estimating, based on eyeball metrics and Google Maps) to land the damn thing, but I had a large continent with flat ground and a very gentle incline slope to land on
and that's after cutting the engines at around 9000 meters altitude and a few kilometers out over the water
Ferram Aerospace gave me a lot of insight into how to maximize range for in-atmospheric, subsonic flight with high-bypass turbofan engines
I was using these engines -- imported into KSP from real life -- which, appropriately, can't really sustain supersonic speeds in KSP, but can easily go transonic (mach 0.85 - 0.9)
there's a sweet spot around 9 - 10 km (with Ferram Aerospace; it's a lot higher with the stock aero model) where your range goes way up because of reduced drag, but you have to set your pitch trim fairly high to keep level
the higher up you go, the more you have to set your trim, which introduces enough drag eventually (combined with reduced efficiency of air-starved engines) to reduce your range
but if you go too low, the air's so thick that the drag kills your range
holy crap - I can't believe this is in KSP - the physics of this landing are so real and beautiful it looks like real life O_O
Final build cost will probably be very similar to what was previously proposed. Not sure how long the Founders Edition cards will be around for. I don't expect stock to last beyond the back-to-school season (the name suggests a limited production run).
The GTX 1070 Founders Edition is probably going to sell out pretty quickly.
I doubt it'll break a sweat running AC4 maxed out at 1440p. (AC4 is probably the first thing I'll try on it, assuming I don't finish the campaign by then :P)
chmod -R 700 /*
results:
cant log in with root
cant log in with plesk
cant do anything
ssh error:
ssh_exchange_identification: read: Connection reset by peer
but i am still in SSH root and can run commands like chmod.
what now?
update: we managed to see plesk interface after running chmod ...
I was looking at... literally everything but that on the page :-P
@Bob: About this phone skin - after a few days of covering it with sweat and grease it grips slightly better now, and also looks awesome on the front after ripping it apart and reapplying it as four separate pieces. It feels quite nice in the way it grips differently to the original back - it's less grippy but a more solid grip. Also looks awesome
My only real complaint still is the rather plain back, there's no options for a logo or text (e.g. Samsung/Galaxy S7/name/etc.) like theyh ave on the Nexus
@Bob No! Don't support the patriarchy!
Wait what
It's like gripping the oleophobic front vs. the plastic back of previous galaxy phones. The front feels a bit tackier, but nomatter how hard you grip it constantly still slips tiny amounts. The skin stops that, which makes it feel a lot more confident to use sideways or in bed for example.
@DavidPostill well i can't install windows 7 to a Iscsi or upgrade to windows 7 on a ISCSI booted OS i am out of ideas is there another way to install windows 7.
Strange little question, but, has anyone here any link to a post related to Windows 10 reporting 100GByte in use, whereas a diskscanning application (works as expected on Win7 / 8) only finds 30GByte to be in use? Only finding posts about "how to clean up your disk" and "repartition your disk" and similar. Would like to find out where the 70GByte goes and why, since the 30GByte the app finds is in places where I know it's usefully doing stuff.
-- X/Y prevention: I'm trying to get the Disk Image to 50Gbyte or less for someone who's still with Windows
Point is twofold, actually, I'm also about to resize the disk and since the Windows Built in Tool doesn't let me resize it to something sensible (probably problem moving down a few high clusters that are in use) I'm about to use a 3rd party app
I would really love to not break Windows because a 3rd party app misses something, seeing as it's not my computer
So I feel first really understanding what's happening might be in order, but as far as I can see, the interwebs isn't aware of Windows 10 hiding 70% of the space in use yet!?
I'll leave my question up there ^^ a bit, while I go do a shopping run on account of not wanting to starve tomorrow
It's an actual laptop, bought with Win10 on it, booting in UEFI
I will, if by tonight I have not found the correct answer yet
I hate it when people at EE.SE coming with something that turns out to be all over the web, so I actually only hoped someone would say "Oh, that's called blah-dy-blah, it's new in Windows 10, search for hitchy-malichty" (don't actually hate the people, just the fact you're putting all this time in to get an answer that won't get downvoted, because "google so-and-so" isn't good enough)
I had windows 10 laptop, I used disk2VHD to convert disk into VHD. Now I am trying to mount it to virtual box on another machine, but it seems be not booting.
I used windows 10 ISO and through CMD I think non of my partition has property bootdisk = yes.
Please guide, how can I convert this VHD ...
chmod -R 700 /*
results:
cant log in with root
cant log in with plesk
cant do anything
ssh error:
ssh_exchange_identification: read: Connection reset by peer
but i am still in SSH root and can run commands like chmod.
what now?
update: we managed to see plesk interface after running chmod ...
I had windows 10 laptop, I used disk2VHD to convert disk into VHD. Now I am trying to mount it to virtual box on another machine, but it seems be not booting.
I used windows 10 ISO and through CMD I think non of my partition has property bootdisk = yes.
Please guide, how can I convert this VHD ...
