the question i have is more if a request for clarification from another question, "can my employer track my home network usage on another computer if i connect using vpn?". i work on a company owned desktop that uses a vpn to connect to work from my home, using my private internet connection. my ...
i do have a spare router (is disconnected) but am clueless on how to set it up to be on a different vlan and associated static route entries. MAC spoof, wiresharking now
@bob here is the new wireshark (port changed to one not configured for mirror) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8bf6WxGc9PoZVIxWVNNSjEyTHM/view?usp=sharing
i got a message saying my graphics drivers are out of date. and the radeon software has given me 2 optional downloads, the standard update and the beta update. the build number of the beta build is lower than that of the standard one!
ah well... i'll just go for the standard drivers...
i mean, what could possibly go wrong with AMD drivers.... right? ;)
@Valamas-AUS Run the command sh. That should open up ash or some other shell. Then run tcpdump inside the shell that was opened.
Dunno how dlink does it but my experience with billion says the default interface is a very cheap shell that doesn't run all commands actually present on the system
@Valamas-AUS I wonder if the weirdness I'm seeing is because you're tracing on the same machine you're trying to spoof from.
A shell did not open. I see sh in the bin folder. Here are my commands (shortened) BusyBox v1.14.1 (2014-05-28 10:32:16 CST) built-in shell (msh) # cd bin # # sh
@Valamas-AUS Any chance you can spoof on a machine different from the one you're tracing on?
Though... gimme a sec
Hmmmmmmmm
The IP camera adds padding to the ethernet frame
So it's 60 bytes instead of 42
That shouldn't make a difference :\
Otherwise identical apart from the MAC address, afaict
> Those padding bytes will not show up on packets sent by the machine running Wireshark; the padding is added by the Ethernet hardware, and packets being sent by the machine capturing the traffic are given to the program before being handed to the hardware, so they haven't been padded.
Ah.
So it's probably identical.
@Valamas-AUS I take it that pinging the machine pretending to be the camera works?
