« first day (1631 days earlier)      last day (3685 days later) » 

00:12
@Bob: poorly photochopped
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek ?
The notice of extortion?
Bob
Bob
It's apparently real.
> An extortion letter sent to 900 Degrees Neapolitan Pizzeria in New Hampshire.
 
1 hour later…
" Its creators hope to develop it (the robot) further, so it can not only discharge firearm on the battlefield, but also administer first aid." Flinging bullets around is much harder then patching up the holes made afterwards :-)
Hey @JourneymanGeek are those speeds aceptable for a SATA HDD to SATA HDD copy?
8 hours ago, by That Brazilian Guy
user image
On a gygabyte GA-C847N mini-ITX mobo w/ 2GB RAM
Both HDDs are Seagate ST3000DM001
sure if the files sizes average 2k, and the HD is connected via USB2 :-)
You know what, I'll write a question :P
It does show that there are a lot of files items. 200k writes of the "metadata" or files tables, 200k writes of the journaling stuff, 200k updates of the file bitmap etc.
Add any AV programs doing 200k live scans of the incomming files it sees, and what else we got? on the side programs syncing with the cloud ? comparison routine ,,, oh wait there probably ISNT any comparisons to see if the data actually arrived bit perfect :-)
01:38
As a test, can someone with an OpenPGP-capable email client send me an encrypted email? No sensitive information, please.
@ThatBrazilianGuy: Looks about right to me
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive :-) hmm, i remember something written about that yesterday :-)
Oh, apparently its the 3tbs that suck. That said, I had one of the old, really unreliable ones at one point
01:55
Yea the 3Ts (link posted by JMG back time ago) techreport.com/news/27697/…
Even the newegg Stars are way better for the 1T unit then the model from hell unit.
You're still significantly better off with other brands, IMO. I've had hitachi drives go upwards of 5 years.
Unless you want to diversify storage, which isn't a bad idea
Each of the brands has output a total lemon from time to time.
That is why i hope to see if other people are doing ok with the particular model (at least for the first few months) before "investing" .
02:13
Feedback on how I'm handling PGP?
@Psycogeek "Barracuda 7200.14" == ST3000DM001 ?
OOps, i screwed up the model number on that drive, when searching.
Ok which one is it?
YES IT IS AND I AM OFFICIALLY FUCKED.
NOT ONLY I SPENT 25% OF MY SALARY ON AN HDD, BUT ON ONE WITH 40% FAILURE RATE
"The vast majority of the 3TB Seagate failures are tied to a single model: the Barracuda 7200.14. That drive's annual failure rate jumped from under 10% at the end of 2013 to over 40% a year later. " Well not officially
Yeah, I had one from early 2013 that I've been using with no issues, so I thought "well, I'll buy another, why not".
02:17
Ahh screw it, one number changes in the model
I've been using a 1 TB Barracuda 7200.12 (ST31000528AS) with absolutely zero trouble.
@ThatBrazilianGuy: with one company, that uses it 24/7.
Also, who knows, it may fail within the warranty period
I'm surprised there's this one model that that is known to have systematic problems
@DragonLord: Thats the 7200.11
They also pulled them on any first erroring.
02:20
@JourneymanGeek I had nearly all my non-DVD data on the (same model, older year) one, then last week it crashed mid-write and the NTFS data became read-only. I bought a new one (the shitty batch, apparently) and spent 23 hours copying
All my personal data, photos, videos, etc etc etc
My old eMachines desktop shipped with a 160 GB Barracuda 7200.10 and I'm not aware of any issues on that drive, either.
Because they pulled the first time they get things like a "rebuild" and because it is classed as a "desktop" drive, and because they applied them in raid, there is a possibility that problems could exist from the first error TLER bs timeout thing.
Guess I've been lucky...
@ThatBrazilianGuy: That's prolly why if I don't go with the 8TB drives on my storage box, I'll end up going with drives from different manufacturers ;p
Annoyingly my favourite HW shop dosen't sell HGST any more
> it crashed mid-write
"crashed" in this context means bad USB cable, not the drive's fault.
02:25
ahh
2
@ThatBrazilianGuy: I do not trust USB drives for long term storage
@JourneymanGeek USB case/adapter
Anyway, gotta go, doctor appointment tomorrow, they'll scan my bones looking for computer malware.
Naw they scan your body looking for your wallet :-) If it shows up thick enough , your sick.
There is always a Plus side "•70% or more of the materials used to build Seagate Desktop HDDs are recyclable."
(even if only 60% of your data will be recoverable)
By which they mean they reflash the firmware on the dead ones and send them out as spares ;)
Bob
Bob
02:48
@Psycogeek technically anything inorganic is recyclable
organic cells practically invented recycling
look at how many organisms / animals eat the feces of something else
you guys liked my virus, eh? :P ("my" -- not really, but still)
it even fits (in full) into the star wall
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic well, recyclable by humans :P
Yea and about that organic computer, who is going to clean up after it :-)
I figure newspapers will make a comeback
AFK, my computer has to poop
4
your computer coughed on mine and gave it a virus!!!! >:(
Bob
Bob
o.O
11
Q: Pre-allocate (guarantee) memory in a .NET application

E MIs it possible for a .NET 3.5 application to tell the .NET runtime: "hey, I'm going to use n MB memory later on, so please either commit that much now or fail now?" The context for this is: I have a C# console application that runs a database query that returns a lot of data and and then does so...

03:00
You should have changed the fluidic transverter more often and maintaned the level on the microbiotic feed mechanism, you know you cant visit the cloud without ending up with a moisture conversion bacterial infection.
Why would anyone need that even a well written .Net program will eventually eat up all your memory :-)
(not like you have to purposfully code that in :-)
03:18
A bit of an unusual request, but is anyone here able to recommend a wheeled backpack with extra-durable wheels?
The wheels on my High Sierra backpack have failed after about one year of use.
Budget is US$100 but we can stretch that a bit if there's a good reason to
get air tires with ball bearings, uhh i dont suppose you have a weight restriction :-)
Typical load is about 10-15 lb but may hit 25 lb with textbooks
Oh well i guess that discludes the axel
One of these, and you wont have wheel problems anymore
Look, I'm serious here.
I have KIT plans for it :-) only $50 the rest you can pick up at any farm machinery auction.
There are "cart" wheels at local hardware stores, they are about the only thing that holds up. "castors" and other cheap furnature wheels all get stopped by hitting a small rock, are plastic junk and no bearings.
Bob
Bob
03:31
@DragonLord ...that's pretty damn heavy
and here I am trying to cut 1kg off the laptop weight... electronic textbooks ftw
Rollerblades wheels support mass weight, have some flex and good bearings, and you can get parts and pieces for them.
25lb is not the usual load for what it's worth
Most of the time, it's a 10-15 lb load
The laptop is what contributes the most weight
The Dragon is an old-style, full-thickness laptop and the AC adapter does not help
Bumpity bumpity on electronics, some kind of air or partly soft tire to reduce shock.
The larger of the foot pedal scooters (vrses the tiny wheel ones) qualify as lightweight and would offer some shock reduction. Just the tires. but then we dont know what your possible mounting system is.
Okay, I need a bit of a consensus on this one: Should I step back from community moderation activities for a few days?
See recent chat messages in Ask a Super User Moderator to understand why I'm asking this
Is this about you herassing ramhound? i thought yous guys were getting along a lot better?
03:43
No, this has nothing to do with the Ramhound dispute
That matter is resolved.
well if it is burnout, the answer to that is always a vacation.
@DragonLord You are the most qualified person to answer that question
How do you feel? If you feel like your head is spinning because you're doing too much, give it a rest to reflect and simplify things in your mind
(or as I keep saying. have fun)
I'm worried about mistakes reflecting badly on me, but I'm getting a nagging feeling that the community needs me
I'm one of just a few users who do a full 40 close vote reviews a day.
04:01
You probably wouldnt have to work so hard, if i wasnt re-opening them again :-)
rofl
The close queue is automatically refilled. I did over a hundred closures at one point, but meh, its boring, and I have better things to do with my time
Bob
Bob
Huh.
So, should I stop pinging you so much @JourneymanGeek? :P
@Bob: Oh, if its something actually concerning me, directly its fine.
04:33
@mdpc I think you missed the point with the following edit.
Bob
Bob
@killermist pings only work if they were recently in chat
Even as a novice of the format, it was laid out in a manner I could understand. The problems I saw were the software recommendation nature built-in, and the unnecessary tag.
@Bob I was hoping that (as others had used on me) that it would constitute a lesser summon of some sort.
Along the lines of "Hey, you guy that was mentioned in chat. You were mentioned in chat. You probably should join in that."
Based on "mdpc has approved 127 edit suggestions and rejected 71 edit suggestions", I'd say that he's a bit of an edit hater to begin with. So, especially having the edit succeed, I don't feel insulted in total, but I wonder if the particular edit moderator actually knows what he's (she's?) doing.
@killermist: dosen't unless you're a mod. ;p
Bob
Bob
@killermist if they haven't been in the room recently, only mods can ping them
and that's a special ping
Bob
Bob
04:44
and it's a special kind of ping ("superping"), not the normal @user (though it renders the same)
...I need to type faster
Ah. Makes sense.
Ahh joy. I need to keep an eye on stuff. Scripted it so it checks and autorefreshes.
Bob
Bob
@killermist If you feel it's a general issue, you can mention it on meta, though specifically naming/shaming someone can result in a bad reaction - it's better to keep meta questions general where possible
If it's a severe issue with one person, you might be able to convince a mod to bring them in
Not sure how this ranks on the severity scale
@Bob I think if I were to phrase this as a meta question, I think I could sufficiently ambiguate it to not directly call the person out.
@killermist: I suppose that's another reason we need more than one user approving edits
@Sathya ^ ;p
05:13
@JourneymanGeek Not sure how to insert the image from a Dropbox link in meta.superuser.com/questions/9085/…
@killermist: if all else fails, copy/paste into imgur, then upload from there?
or ugh
use imgur to start with ;p
05:25
@JourneymanGeek haha
Bah. and such.
0
Q: How much negative result is there to having some aggressive edit refusers?

killermistI generally don't take a strong interest in the process behind what occurs between when I suggest an edit and the edit becoming formalized. I was a bit bored today, and so I watched a little more intently the process as it occurred. After the edit was accepted, something kinda struck me. I'm...

Got the image cross-posted to someplace that seems to work.
05:47
Better. imgur is probably the easiest way of doing it still ;p
Well, I did it.
Off to bed now.
Bob
Bob
Ahhhhh Friday afternoon
Half an hour to go and I really don't want to do anything :(
@Bob: 5 hours to go for me ;p
06:05
I have yet to go to bed to sleep before my workday lol
Bob
Bob
:S
Damn Americans, stuck in the past...
lol
I was thinking more the lack of sleep
Bob
Bob
This is really a beautifully detailed question:
1
Q: What components in a computer have the potential to damage a GPU?

user3144349Something in my computer is damaging any graphics card that is put into the computer. I would like to know what components have the capability of damaging a graphics card, and how to determine which component is the culprit. Some Specifics: I know the graphics card isn't the problem, as multip...

I wish every troubleshooting question was like that.
06:21
new SSD up and running. :D
06:34
@Bob I have reworked the hardware (cooling) and the software for my GPU over and over again (different ones) to have it be manuel, cool the freaking rams better, and discard thier opinion that ~100*c is still "ok" (when chip research shows that <80*c would be "better" .) Then they live a much longer happier life. When this stuff was slower, less power, less overclocked from the factory, they did fine too. First thing he says is it is not the card, well the cards dont make it easy :-)
I hate Thermal pads , mentally they look more like some form of insulation :-) than transfer. They always jam the ram under something (vrses ram freeair) then expect that the thermal pads will solution it. The temperature probe says Meh about that.
Then the users get thier hands on a slider that shoves the ram speed up to like 1400, test it poorly with the wrong thing for testing it, then run around forums saying "ohh lookie 1400 works fine" 2 days later " why my game crash" Uhh NO!! they are alredy pushing it (from the factory), and unless you cool it, moving that slider that far , well thats just wrong .
heh
I've had a motherboard that would burn out ram installed in a specific slot
Bob
Bob
urk
just spent half an hour catching up with close to a month's worth of timesheets... this timesheeting software... blargh
@JourneymanGeek etherkiller's long lost brother? :P
06:49
Then watercoolers , can sometimes completly "miss the boat" $1200 water cooling system , $125 billet chrome waterblock, UV glowing tubing, and minimal air flow across the board itself. The CPU is like 22below 0, and some components on the motherboard are glowing red :-)
Back some time ago, they would do the water cooling, and a temp probe would show that the voltage regulation components were at 100*c . at least now they addresses the "VRMs" in most of the stuff.
It was less of the water cooling people, who still recognised that all the turbulance that would have been there before, all "other places" that the cpu fan blew on, as thier almighty single component was cooler than it actually "needed" to be even for thier overclock.
I have always been of the opinion that if instead i can have everything sit < 50-60*c (kind of idea) that the whole thing would survive just fine.
heh. Water cooling isn't that much more efficient than aircooling. Its just quieter in some cases
Move heat 1 foot , repeat as needed :-)
Another thing that bugged me about the water cooling, the pumps inards look more like something you put in a $100 fountain , not a $2200 computer. I wanted ball bearings, brass fins , and a Pump that i could put the radiator (and fans) 10 feet away out the window (california) .
Sure, people do that. Then use a car radiator
Then to finish the idea of me ever doing it, maintance :-) yea like thats gonna happen.
I could start the water out with green dye :-) so the algie wouldnt distract .
So now using very high end tested recommended air coolers, and full thermal control, i basically get within ~2% of the final OC 24-7 they do, overall flow control, and i am pretty sure it is quieter most of the time than it would be.
-Over at the overclockers they always would have the bestest PSU, and the Seasonic is the Beez Kneez , but there are an inordinate ammount of PSUs still causing problems, really weird ones they should not have anything to do with. Especially interesting to me, when i buy a brand new Johhney Guru PSU and dont even get it installed.
Tops rated PSU after hours of research, and something it rattling inside. Before installing (goodby warrenty) i find out it had been fully shorted out inside. Phhht, all that work finding the best one, and they had damaged it severly at the factory (void sticker still in place)
That one
The weird symptoms for this strange PSU issue were only apparent when sleeping the computer, or changing the uefi. other than that it would run thier computer full OC roasting. I am still trying to figure the logic by which that would happen?
07:54
heh. I currently have a seasonic m12
man, I'm bored
08:17
superuser.com/questions/868399/… I must be getting old and blind, when i do not even know what ever happened to RWED (Read , Write, Edit Delete) the old Dos attributes that you could apply to every file or folder.
I have had a backup since dos :-) so i have not even looked at attributes other than to have to undo a read-only a few times.
The google search even comes up with (practically) nothing for these in windows.
08:40
Amiga , that is where it came from. the commodedoor amiga used that method. windows uses HFDUIV (hide from dum users , invisable virus) method instead.
wow that is cool, you can delete everything in windows even in read only, without even the thing popping up a requester. They should make programs that do that :-) Duhhhh
I should run over to microsoft request line, and ask them to put something like that in one of thier operating systems 15+ years and 2million viruses and 18 petabytes of lost data later. Feature :-)
09:15
there it is , 7 clicks down in the security tab, (advanced, special permisson) Delete permissions. which only has the caveat that if you have delete permission for the parent , the child you changed can still be deleted.
As read in thier own help: "If you do not have Delete permission on a file or folder, you can still delete it if you have been granted Delete Subfolders and Files on the parent folder."
 
1 hour later…
10:43
11:36
0
Q: disable resizing/moving of any window with the mouse

Carlos CampderrósI'm writing a small app that handles window positions and sizes, and I'd like to disable the resize/move feature of windows using the mouse (dragging the borders or the title bar). I know this seems very anti-UX, but this is really what I need. I'd need to do that in a way that all new windows a...

Sure just Remove the borders :-)
you can make the borders in the >win7 beloted borders down to one pixel (10 default), then we just use the same curser for h-rsize and v-resize as the normal curser. slip the center point for the curser off by 3 pix. the user then would have a lot of fun trying to grab them :-)
Full screen "virtual view" the user thinks they are seeing the desktop, but instead it is a "full screen" program displaying the desktop by proxy.
 
2 hours later…
13:20
Everytime I see questions like "why they treat my e-mail as spam" i am always expecting to see in the content somewhere "the 3,000 e-mails that i sent out from the free e-mail address . . . .
Bob
Bob
13:33
From the comments
"Most people are like slinkies , their really not good for anything , but still bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs"
2
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek ...why is there a scrollbar
@Psycogeek THEIR Ò_Ó
Bob
Bob
lol
@Bob scrollbar? i do not see that here, even after shrinking up the chat browser window?
Bob
Bob
13:42
It must be you :-)
I use a
Shift Space
Sometimes, to put things on new lines?
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek I do that often too. That's the first (and only) message to have the scroll.
test
ing
Yea, that specific set of text o.O
Don't you mean shift enter?
uhh yea that
@Bob I see no scrollbar either
Bob
Bob
13:47
o.O
I do
what browser/OS?
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek FF/Win7
same here
Bob
Bob
Interesting.
Not happening to me on FF/linux, though I have @OliverSalzburg's black theme on that
14:06
FF 31 on ubuntu, doesn't happen here
This should be hillarious. I'm about to do a disk speed check on a VHD that's mounted over smb... on the other end of my homeplug AV connection
@JourneymanGeek About disk speeds...
0
Q: Slow data transfer between two SATA HDDs

That Brazilian GuyIs 30 MBps (30 megabytes/sec) an acceptable data transfer speed for SATA to SATA copy? I'm copying data off one HDD into another. Both HDDs are Seagate ST3000DM001, one from 2012 and other from 2014, the 2nd one is empty. Both are directly connected to the SATA ports of a Gigabyte GA-C847N mini-...

Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Is it SMBv3?
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek :(
v3 is the one designed for VM disks
14:16
@Bob: not all VHDs are VM disks
@ThatBrazilianGuy: hm. my 3tb is at about 3x that speed...
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Same concept.
@JourneymanGeek Yeah, I'd be happy with that =/
14:20
That's clearly incorrect or overagressive caching
Is that 3 GIGABYTES per second?!
@ThatBrazilianGuy: I'm pretty sure the disk its on isn't that fast
and the nic the system the drive is on only does fast ethernet.
and...
I get 1.5 MEGABYTES per second on SMB over wifi and 15 MB/s on ethernet
whuuuuut?
@ThatBrazilianGuy: Either I am on to something or...
Something wrong doesn't seem right ;p
14:22
I'll hit it with a different speed test in a bit
I have the answer for my recent SATA HDD question... I should ditch SATA and adopt VHD-over-SMB :P
this is my 3tb drive
Oh you so slow :-)
crystal disk mark won't run on the VHD ;p
@Psycogeek If he's slow what am I? Stationary?
14:33
The 3tb test (JMG shows) with 150 fast end to 100 slow end, is about par for a good speedy drive. for a low RPM drive it hits more like 125-80
Both my HDD drives are SATA3 7200 RPM (although one connector is SATA2)
But none of that stuff is copying from-->to, and stuff like 4k random files choke on much of this stuff
Sequentiality of the original data, can be very useful, even with small stuff. I like to do "reorder defrags" as long as after doing it once, it is not geting all mixed up and out of order again. (meaning one time it takes forever to finish) For the "storage" things.
most of these drives have blind read ahead routines. they dont know which file they will actually have to copy, but they can read ahead, so sequentiality again.
Then you have sufficent speed on the sata2, but it is likely a board that has a older sata2 controller on it for either back compatability, or in its time foreward moving, the team might not be really fast.
What was the FIle system? and what are the cluster sizes used? i think that is missing from the question?
Larger cluster sizes , will waste space for smaller files, but they can be a bit faster than default 4k clusters when moving data.
14:50
@Psycogeek included (NTFS, 4KB)
thats odd
NTFS 3g is fast
and yeah, the number/size of files may be an issue
I get so OCD , i try and put the huge files (movies) on the same partition with bigee clusters, and have smaller partitions with smaller clusters for the smaller files (pictures regular downloads temps etc).
I have to test with a small set of files and see what happens. But I'm only touching those drives again after I md5sum the hell out of them.
I got so OCD, I performed `ls -R` on each and then `diff`ed both :P
But it is not enough, I need byte-level comparision! :P
best of both worlds, and although over partitioning a drive has little value, there is less head jump per partition, when stuff (to be copied at once) is strewn about the whole disk, more head jump.
@ThatBrazilianGuy: also, in some cases using cp may be faster than a gui
14:55
@Psycogeek Just use an SSD. no head positioning :P
"A watched disk never copies" if you have the usual windows view into the data being copied into a drive, and the thing keeps refreshing, you have more IwhileO , reads slowing down the writes and filling the buffers.
I don't thing that's a think.
This is 4xraid0 with combined buffers, as you can see 4K random Chokes and dies , no mater how fast the HD is
@Psycogeek 4 x RAID 0? What are you? A masochist?!
like 10 and 30 times slower. and additionaly hurt by that comming off 1 disk probably, plus low rpm drives have that as the latency problem (vrses totally sequential).
15:03
lol
@ThatBrazilianGuy well yes i hope so :-)
But the computer is usually on-top :-)
I actually have 2 of those, because I found it is pretty useless to combine the disk together , then copy Back to Itself IwhileO . when it is better for say 2X teams to be talking to another 2X team.
@Psycogeek What's a "IwhileO"?
One reading as fast as it can, the other just trying to keep up with the writing.
IwhileO stuff going in when stuff is trying to go out at the same time. Not only is the interface balked by that, but the poor disk head has to try hopping all over the place to read this, write that, it just chokes a HD.
Input While Output
I see. I have already experienced this.
everyone always likes to say I/O but IwhileO is ignored and I found it to be really important in more than a few things.
15:16
@Psycogeek Isn't NCQ built to circumvent that?
!!wiki NCQ
In computing, Native Command Queuing (NCQ) is an extension of the Serial ATA protocol allowing hard disk drives to internally optimize the order in which received read and write commands are executed. This can reduce the amount of unnecessary drive head movement, resulting in increased performance (and slightly decreased wear of the drive) for workloads where multiple simultaneous read/write requests are outstanding, most often occurring in server-type applications. == History == Native Command Queuing was preceded by Parallel ATA's version of Tagged Command Queuing (TCQ). ATA's attempt a...
@ThatBrazilianGuy: @Psycogeek prolly dosen't believe in such newfangled things ;p
Untill they actually work in real life
guys whats up
Im struggling to get a vpn to work
@JourneymanGeek @Psycogeek Is NCQ present in all current HDDs? Does it need OS support? Driver support? mobo chipset support? Filesystem support?
15:18
can you help me
@AhmedDaou The sky, the sun and the moon.
@ThatBrazilianGuy: yes, yes, yes, maybe, no.
Most modern systems should be aware of it tho, through AHCI support
@AhmedDaou I would if I could, but I never touched a VPN
"For NCQ to be enabled, it must be supported and enabled in the SATA host bus adapter and in the hard drive itself. The appropriate driver must be loaded into the operating system to enable NCQ on the host bus adapter" and such is that AHCI thing, shown to be a fair percentage increase for SSDs to be using the AHCI driver stuff and all.
@ThatBrazilianGuy oh okay thanks anyway
15:26
@AhmedDaou You could try contacting the support of your VPN provider, they usually can help you with setting it up.
Windows seems to plop files all over the place, find a hole fill it, it does not seem to be this NCQ thing , landing stuff in sync with rotation, and (picture to follow) it makes such a bloody non sequential unordered mess (on platters) if it was doing that to help it failed. In the long run.
s1107.photobucket.com/user/Psycogeec/media/… <--- nonsequential going to be fragmented later mess (windows)
@Psycogeek 404
praise-be to imgur :-) cause that place gets worse and worse
Could be that this is where the rotation would have landed, it does have a pattern that might inidicate that. but if i keep filling that up something is going to get all fragged into those spaces eventually interleaved with it.
I am not going to stop defragging when they say it is no longer nessisary, because fully ordered data is (more) recoverable data in dire problems.
15:47
Once again, can some with an OpenPGP email send me a encrypted email to me as a test?
This time, just use the email at the bottom of my home page
"Tests at Google around 2008 have shown that NCQ can delay an I/O for up to 1-2 seconds. A proposed workaround is for the operating system to artificially starve the NCQ queue sooner in order to satisfy low-latency applications in a timely manner" The wiki itself does not seem to have real recent data on that. But the hardware sites are showing ACHI well worth making sure it is on for SSDs
Ahh AHCI
 
1 hour later…
17:04
Note: I will not be responding to Pings today, as I'll be in a training course all day
Mine looks like a total disaster...
17:40
I can't make Windows 7 Calendar pop up after clicking in System Tray. Nothing happens.
I also no longer see Wireless Connection signal quality meter in System Tray.

Restarting does not help...
@Psycogeek There's a technical term for that: contention.
 
2 hours later…
MLM
MLM
19:15
I am wanting to disable some Norton right-click context menu entries in Windows 8.1. I am using CCleaner but I keep getting a "Access denied" error whenever I try to disable the Norton entries. How do I get around the protection? I tried ShellExView but the entries are still in the context menu.
I have also tried to "Run as administrator" when opening CCleaner
Got it: Had to disable Norton->Settings->Norton Tamper protection
19:54
hi
can anyone suggest tags for stackoverflow.com/questions/28111245/… ?
@Lembik ?
> This question was voluntarily removed by its author.
20:11
@allquixotic ??
@allquixotic Can you explain?
MLM
MLM
20:32
I solved before actually posting the question, would this question be useful to future onlookers? "Context(right-click) menu long loading times when Network connected". The solution was to disable Perforce P4EXP.P4EXPContextMenuExtension using ShellExView. (question/answer would be more fleshed out)
@MLM Not sure. Perhaps, and maybe it could be related to general slowdowns in the context menu due to third party programs that wait for network connections?
MLM
MLM
@BenRichards It is but wondering if it is worth a question/answer for others to see in google. I see it was mentioned in the perforce notes (search "delay") but maybe it regressed
@MLM If not it'll get downvoted. ;) I'd say if you saw a lot of talk about it online when diagnosing it and it was a lot of effort for you to fix, then probably it's worth posting here. That's sometimes my criteria.
Especially if most of the stuff you see online didn't have a clear solution.
MLM
MLM
Well it wasn't in the CCleaner context menu utility and I shied away from ShellExViewer because it looked scrappy. Comparing the list found by each, ShellExViewer shows more. I used WinDbg and attached to the explorer.exe process to see the mods loaded when the context menu popped up.
Was dealing with this issue for weeks. First thought it was my HDD so I did chkdsk, defrag, sfc /scannow but it didn't change anything
20:48
Ah. Usually I start with lots of google searches because that usually lets me forgo manual debugging. :P
MLM
MLM
Ye I did of course but didn't turn up great results or fixes. That is what prompted the HDD possible triage
Then post it. :)
MLM
MLM
Looking back now, people did suggest using ShellExViewer to turn off context menu entries until it was fixed. I did that with CCleaner thinking it was equivalent but as mentioned before, wasn't :/. And the Perforce entry snuck through my visual inspection because it is a single entry with no special icon.
MLM
MLM
I'll post :)
20:55
How to vote for migration?
And why is the flag menu a complete duplicate of the close menu?
@TomWijsman Vote to close -> Off Topic -> Belongs on another site in the network
  This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center.
  Questions seeking for hardware shopping recommendations are off-topic because they are often relevant only to the question author at the time the question was asked and tend to become obsolete quickly. Instead of asking what to buy, try asking how to find out what suits your needs.
  Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the speci
@TomWijsman I think flag is for people w/o the ability to vote to close.
@BenRichards iotw, there is no "Belongs on another site in the network"
@TomWijsman Which question?
20:58
Turns out the option goes away for older questions.
Why is that limitation introduced? :-/
Sounds like a question for Meta!
MLM
MLM
21:28
0
Q: Context(right-click) menu Long loading times when Network connected

MLMThe right-click context menu takes 10+ seconds to open on any file/folder. The delay does not change between repetitively right-clicking on the same file/folder. I also sometimes get explorer crashes. There is no delay if I am not connected to a network (wired or wifi). It also doesn't matter if...

@BenRichards done, posted :)
21:54
can anyone suggest any tags for superuser.com/questions/868653/… ?
28
Q: Disable migration for questions older than 60 days

Shog9This has come up a few times now: migrating old questions causes problems. The most popular solution to this to date has been to reset votes on migrated posts. This is do-able, but frankly it feels like treating a symptom, and doing so in a way that penalizes folks who answer what are by all ap...

22:19
@Bob I see it as well.

« first day (1631 days earlier)      last day (3685 days later) »