« first day (1199 days earlier)      last day (4114 days later) » 

14:00
so files can be downloaded but not uploaded on SD card
i figured it out like 1 month ago
and was able to do some "hack" to do it
but i forgot the "hack"
i think i saw the solution on Youtube
i thinkg vista and xp do not have this problem
i have mcafee as antivirus , antispam, firewall installed
funny thing is
that i also uploaded one file on sd card like 1 hour ago
i want to upload the whole album
but i was able to upload only 1 song
when i start copying
it says something like ....
its not possible
i use total commander
maybe it says its not possible
but it does the copying anyway
ìt says
PLEASE REMOVE THE WRITE PROTECTION
@EinsteinsGrandson No, you just need some of them since a few are backward compatible. (But no all of them). So they do tend to clustter up your system and they do use a lot of CPU time and disk access after you installed them. The latter can make an old system slow for hours (once again, after installing them and after rebooting).
pardon me, @Hennes
it was supposed to be to somebody else not me ,right?
Yes, I used the reply link.
now i see
it can be anything
Damn confusing similar names, but for once I got it right.
14:11
its not my computer
its the idiots who dont know how to use devices
and then ask me to fix it for them only for few months
because it wont work again
since they will repeat the same mistakes again
and then they are angry that i dont want to fix it again..
One easy solution: Deny admin rights
;o)
i have been denying for 6-7 months now
they keep asking me to fix it
;o)
its not that little switch
its something else
on the big SD card adapter
that i insert into slot on laptop
its some crazy thing
since that little switch is where it is supposed to be
and i was able to upload 1 song on sd card
Bob
Bob
@Hennes Eh.
Specifically, you have certain CLR versions.
There was a great diagram on MSDN that I can't find now.
what the hell
I was searching for it in the chat history (because I've posted it here before), and it was in a similar conversation with the same person
May 26 at 15:31, by Einsteins Grandson
I mean, I can't uninstall all of them but one ... .uninstlaling NET Framework 2.0, 3.0 , 3.5 and keeping only 4.0 ?
We really do just loop conversation topics here.
IIRC keep .net 1. 3.5 and 4.5
Or dump ..net 1 and tell people to update their programs.
yeah i know Bob
14:21
Or use perl and regexs. That will solve all your problems.
i dont remember the solution though
Bob
Bob
@EinsteinsGrandson Click the link in that message (the datestamp) and you can reread the conversation.
@Hennes Yep.
so what is the result?
that i can just have the last .net framework?
Bob
Bob
They've removed that diagram from the site since then :(
and dont need others?
Bob
Bob
14:22
@allquixotic ^ (you were remarking on it actually being helpful :P)
the problem is its somehow all conected
Bob
Bob
@EinsteinsGrandson try actually reading.
the laptop was having problems with updating .Net framework
Bob
Bob
@Hennes ya
then the solution was to uninstall all the frameworks
and install the last one
and now
Bob
Bob
14:23
I try to target 2.0-3.5 where possible, but that's because it's the one that comes with win7
@EinsteinsGrandson If it says make sure write protection is on, make sure the small tab at the side is at off
Bob
Bob
no qualms about jumping to 4.0-4.5 when I need new stuff though
@Gowtham i know
so again
Bob
Bob
@EinsteinsGrandson again, read the bloody messages
we've answered this many times over
14:24
It would be nice if windows used a nice packaged program system, similar to registered DLL with start, settings, control panel, add and remove software
Bob
Bob
I'm honestly sick of answering the same question over and over.
i will not invest single second to solve this problem anymore
you won't read the messages?
then why ask?
Where you increase a counter when in use, decrease it on uninstall and delete if the counter is 0
i will be reading for 20 hours
will try to fix it for 20 hours
Bob
Bob
14:26
@Hennes Well, MSIs do some of it.
Doesn't work too well for dependencies, though.
Not sure why not: If you need a dependency then just mark that).
Bob
Bob
Then again, the default action with apt-get is to remove only the specified package - you need a different option (autoremove) to remove the dependencies too.
@Hennes I mean it doesn't at the moment.
I know it works on the BSDs (port tree), on OS X (homebrew ports), on partage (linux), on DLL (windows), ....
Bob
Bob
Also, working with dependencies assumes a centralised package repository.
Which really doesn't work when you have so many disparate sources.
Yup. Which works for windows when they used DLL's
14:27
myabe there is one update that is missing
Bob
Bob
@Hennes Hm? Do they actually have a reference count?
I didn't know that.
ok
so maybe there are some updates
missing
This is the whole story again
the downloading and installing of updates was set up for 3:00 AM
the owner of the laptop
was angry that the laptop was waking him up every night
so she took the battery off
then the updates were not installed for some months
then there were problems with updating .NET
so all the .NET frameworks 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 were uninstalled
@Bob In XP the dlls had a reference count. Uninstalling a program used to decrease this and you got a popup with "XXXX.dll is no longer in use by any program. Do you want to delete XXXX.dll? This might brake other programs". (Or close to that).
Which rather shows that not all programs properly registered themselves.
Bob
Bob
@Hennes That was only specific installers, though, IIRC.
Not sure if it was MSI or something else.
It has been a while since I saw those messages.
Bob
Bob
14:35
0
Q: Manually increment or decrement file reference counter (refcount) used by MSI installers?

J JMy understanding is that MSI installers use a file reference count to keep track of how many 'installers' installed a shared file (say a dll). [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE]\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Current Version\SharedDLLs This way, say 3 products all install the same DLL, the refcount is at 3. When ...

@Hennes ^
> The method you describe ("SharedDLLs" Registry key) has been deprecated and replaced by side-by-side assemblies, Microsoft's solution to "DLL hell".
> To do correct code caching, the existing shared DLL reference counting scheme will not suffice because reference counts are easily inflated. Specifically, any application that is reinstalled increases the reference count on a shared DLL even though that DLL already has a reference count belonging to the particular application.
> This is already broken for current reference counting, but it will especially fail for Internet Component Download, in which OCXs are used by multiple pages quite regularly and there is no way of knowing which OCXs need reference counts.
though that was even before SxS
that was ActiveX's way of bypassing the system-wide counters
what is the problem with installing updates anyway?
why do they download but dont install?
what is that one thing that prevents them to be installed?
Bob
Bob
@EinsteinsGrandson any given update can have a multitude of possible reasons. read the update/error logs. and no, I don't know where they are, but a quick google search will suffice.
They are in %windir%/windowsupdate.log
14:43
great
i will look at it
My default reaction to windows updates failing is:
1) Look in evenviewer and the windowsupdate log>
2) Reboot
3) Net stop wuauserv, delete the softwaredistribution folder. Net start wuauserv. RUn updates
i didnt understand step 3
Net stop wuauserv?
from an elevated command prompt: stop the windows update service
Then you can go to C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution and delete all of it.
Optionally you can now also clean the windowsupdate.log file (which is often quite large)
Then restart the service
softwaredistribution is direcotry?
or a file?
Yes
Bob
Bob
@Hennes Ahem. (a or b? yes) :P
it is a directory with a lot of used (and redownloadable) windows update files
Tea or coffee?
Yes please!
access is denied!
system error 5
14:48
> Is it a directory?
Start typing yes
> or a file
Press enter
^ @Bob
Bob
Bob
@Hennes Ya, I got what happened. That was a joking response :P
You are admin which means: 1) you are mortal user 2) with rights to elevate
so i have no clue why it does not let me stop the servie of updating
Bob
Bob
> from an elevated command prompt
> elevated
14:49
Did you start a command prompt with elevated rights?
Ah, damn.
Bob
Bob
there's ya keyword
the new COMMAND PROMPD?
that blue Windows Shell?
or what?
14:51
its administrator command prompt
or how can i open it?
Bob
Bob
@EinsteinsGrandson evidently not, if it's giving you access is denied errors
2 mins ago, by Hennes
You are admin which means: 1) you are mortal user 2) with rights to elevate
Without activated admin stuff you get error 5
However elevate the right. E.g. RUN AS ADMIN
Bob
Bob
you can elevate to admin, but unless you explicitly do so everything will run with restricted privileges
Then you get this:
Bob
Bob
14:52
this is called security
C:\Windows\system32>net stop wuauserv
The Windows Update service is stopping.
The Windows Update service was stopped successfully.
If you wthink it is to much work go start it that way, then read on of the many answers on Super User with "How to always start an admin cmd" :)
Or in unix speech. Admin is not root, but a user with sudo rights
14:54
so now i deleted that softwaredistribution direcotry
(As answer to a bit earlier in the conversation)
now i want to trigger installing updates
from windows
Ok, restart the service.
how will i do it?
Some files will reappear
Then run the normal windows update
net start wuauserv
14:55
btw, i am installing the latest .NET framework
maybe it will help also
4.5.42524565484
Unsurprisingly that also needs an elevated command prompt, and it has this as output
C:\Windows\system32>net start wuauserv
The Windows Update service is starting.
The Windows Update service was started successfully.

« first day (1199 days earlier)      last day (4114 days later) »