I live in a residential neighborhood and have my own office space. This phone is hooked to my Windows 7 PC (See note 1). I used a standard USB-C to USB-A connection.
Tracking the charge statistics of all my linked phones is something I enjoy well. The following screenshot was taken in File explor...
@bwDraco Not entirely sure of the added value of 'anywhere in the world'... Unless it's just a side effect of the setup :)
I mean, do you carry the printer/briefcase with you then, and if so, why do you send print jobs home first instead of straight to the printer? And if the printer doesn't leave the house, why would you want to use it when abroad? :P
btw, there's another easy solution, you can do a delayed hibernate / shutdown - just estimate how long processing / printing takes and add an hour or so for good measure
btw, that Canon PIXMA G650 looks really interesting... What's holding me back though is that I print irregularly... There'll be periods where I process photos and print loads, and then there may be months and months where I'm busy with other things and I don't
How big of an issue is drying out of print heads in general these days, and with this Canon series in particular?
I guess we got a whiff the past two years what visually impaired people go through every day... Having to deal with something you can't see and might kill you, whenever you leave the home
Does anyone here know much about CPU performance? In particular whether or not AES-NI and PCLMUL instructions can execute simultaneously in the pipeline? Or do they cause port conflicts?
for me a few years. Zen3 was just out and I tried to build a 5900X system. Stupidly enough I ordered from a well know CHEAP vendor.... who could not deliver
@MiG Ah... It's just that I'm trying to find out if AES-NI instructions like aesenc can run at the same time as pclmulqdq, which would tell me if AES-GCM would have higher throughput than would be expected from running AES + GHASH in series. I'm kind of trash at CPU profiling myself...
@bwDraco Yeah I know his stuff, but it'd take quite a lot of digging. Also I always mix up Agner Fog and Anders Fogh, since they both work on hardware. :D
@bwDraco x86
@Tom Modern CPUs have very deep pipelines and can effectively execute multiple instructions at once as long as they don't both require using the same hardware (i.e. they don't cause port conflicts) and as long as neither instruction affects the other one (i.e. one instruction does not depend on another having finished first). I'm not sure if AES-NI and PCLMUL are like that, but if they are, then the throughput of them together may be greater than you'd expect. — forest ♦1 hour ago
It's just because I'd like to make sure my comment there is correct.
Ah. Well on Intel even if it's not part of the FPU, it uses the same port. I guess the same for AMD (I forget the term AMD uses for what Intel calls ports).
So it looks like, at least on an old Ivy Bridge server CPU, that 128-bit AES in CTR mode is 3205 MB/s, GCM mode is 935.8 MB/s, and raw GHASH is 1328 MB/s (all for 16 KiB blocks, tested with OpenSSL).
So it looks like they are concurrent even on Ivy Bridge.
Before I tried and failed. I tried with more power and failed. I used more power and it still would not budge,so I worked around it during the original build.
