« first day (1880 days earlier)      last day (3142 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

12:58 AM
user image
2
 
@JourneymanGeek @allquixotic on Groundhog day.
 
@JourneymanGeek Aww, so cute...
 
loool
 
meow
 
"I RISE AGAIN... AHH TICKLES... FLEE FLEEEEE"
 
1:05 AM
lol
 
I'm trying to install this on a local VM (on my desktop, since my home server is out for repair). Its pretty scary that the recommended install method is "run this tarball"
 
1:24 AM
Dell M140, 512MB RAM, Intel Pentium M 1.73Ghz (800MHz). Doing NodeJS development and as a result, installed Linux.
I installed Ubuntu, but Unity ran horrifically slow, to the point where I had to install Midori and XFCE.
But I don't really like the way XFCE looks. Now I'm thinking, should I go back to Unity?
 
@DemCodeLines First world problems there mate.
 
Yeah, why can't I just have the look and feel of Unity and performance of XFCE, what the heck?!
 
@DemCodeLines Why can't I just have the performance of a Ferrari with the MPG of a Prius, what the heck?!
 
I was hoping for a little better when I decided to go with Linux instead of Windows.
 
@DemCodeLines: unity is just heavy
 
1:30 AM
You can't expect much at all with a 10 year old craptop, honestly. Modern Linux distros are designed to run on modern hardware - funny, that. XFCE is the option (well, it's either that or LXDE) if you're unwilling or unable to run a modern system.
 
When my last three phones have had an order of magnitude faster performance than your laptop, several times more RAM, and a fraction of the size, you know you're simply dealing with ancient technology. New software is designed to run on new, not ancient, hardware.
 
If you want a performant desktop experience with a system from 2003, run a Linux distro from 2003 :P
those were designed to run on systems like yours
 
@allquixotic This is the oldest laptop I have in my house. Had to use this as a backup, so trying to get it to work.
 
1:32 AM
Well, I vaguely disagree there. You can still run decent, oldschool updated forks atop a modern base ;p
 
@JourneymanGeek achieving all of the features and all of the eye-candy with none of the performance cost is basically impossible, though -- in order to "pare it down" to run on a potato, you have to sacrifice something - and in some cases you have to sacrifice a lot. And it's much more labor-intensive to micro-optimize for those use cases.
 
@DemCodeLines: unity isn't the best choice here. in this sort of situation I'd actually go with a minimal install first, and tweak. I used to run openbox with stuff on top when I was running a then 10 year old craptop ;p
 
When those use cases are vanishingly small (read: 99% of people are running way more powerful systems), there's no point in putting in the hours to make it micro-optimized, vs. adding new features for people who have decently new systems.
 
@JourneymanGeek Like Arch! :D
 
We could either sit and make what we already have efficient enough to run on hideously old systems and not introduce any new features or innovate (and thus lose 99% of our user base out of disinterest in the process), or we can continue to develop new features and functionality for the 99% to have and appreciate. Hmm... hard choice.
(And no, given that much of GNU/Linux is developed on a volunteer basis, there isn't really enough manpower to do both)
(And if you think there should be more manpower, well, patches welcome)
 
1:35 AM
@allquixotic Not looking for eye-candy. I'd be running Windows if I wanted that.
 
@DemCodeLines Fine, but Unity is still very CPU-intensive even if you take away the compositor. It also does a lot more I/O than an old system is probably used to. Lots of image loading, lots of searching and indexing files, lots of IPC, I think it even has JavaScript thrown in there. It's designed to be flexible, extensible, etc. - things which come at incremental, but significant, performance costs.
There used to be a "Unity 2D" (basically, Unity functionality without the 3d graphics layer for transparency, etc.) - but they stopped developing that
 
I was actually just looking for that. I guess I should revert to Win7 or something.
 
@MichaelFrank: for nodejs development? Not really
@DemCodeLines: Let me reframe that question
What do you dislike of XFCE?
 
I'm not really sure that a desktop environment would be all that relevant to NodeJS development, anyway? I mean, what do you need: a text editor; a web browser; and a bunch of terminals - right? Am I missing something? You could run that in fvwm2 (one of the lightest window managers in existence).
 
Nope, not at all.
lol. I was thinking twm
 
1:39 AM
Nearly all of your work will be searching StackOverflow and copying, modifying and testing code.
I don't see how desktop environment features/functionality play into that...
 
I don't like that top status bar that acts like a Windows taskbar, I want a little taskbar/launcher that exists in Windows/Unity.
 
You DO know you can move those right?
 
or right click and delete...
 
also for a windows style launcher, lxde is good
 
ah yeah! LXDE has something that works vaguely like the Windows start menu
ooh, or how about Cinnamon 2D?
 
1:41 AM
I meant something like Unity/Mac OS X.
 
I think you're being too picky for the hardware you've got and the tasks you need to accomplish :)
 
Perhaps.
 
@JohnB Well said...!!! .... And in other news, whole reason I popped in while at work (yes, at work very late tonight :() -- was just going to say I wrote a script using Selenium to automate my testing activities for the day, and had a chance to play a game of Hearthstone on my phone while it was running... hahaha
And won! :D
 
nice!
 
So what's the consensus then? Do I stick with XFCE? Or go some where else?
 
1:44 AM
woohoo, it's down to the last 4 submissions out of... 76?
 
@allquixotic suggestions?
 
@DemCodeLines I think the general wisdom when it comes to Linux desktop environments is to at least try most/all of them and get a sense of what their UI and performance is like, and stop whenever you find one that seems good enough
you may or may not find something that either works like OS X out of the box or can be customized to be so, I'm not sure because I usually try to configure my Linux DE to work like (approx.) Windows 7
 
Installing LUbuntu now, let's see how this turns out.
 
blah ubuntu
Its not picking up an ipv6 address in virtualbox :/
 
2:43 AM
Lubuntu decided that a desktop was not needed, so it didn't load it altogether.
 
My printer just keeps jamming trying to autoduplex. Seems to be an issue with the ink coverage.
I've never printed a document with this much ink coverage on plain paper before.
I'm going to duplex manually.
(It's a set of presentation slides [class lecture presentation], printed double-sided with 4-up. I print every set of slides for use while studying.)
This particular presentation uses very dark backgrounds and loads of graphics resulting in very high ink usage.
It doesn't help that the printer is doing rich black (which it does unless you're printing in black-and-white mode).
The ideal solution would be to use premium 24 lb (90 gsm) paper, but we don't have any on hand.
Dammit! Multi-page feed error—the printer fed two sheets at once!
Reprinting the first two sheets.
Never before has a print job given me this much trouble.
 
3:04 AM
Sooo.... I'm currently providing tech support for a user in Bangalore. Something seems backwards here...
 
3:26 AM
lol
 
Is there a better way to refer to the question asker, instead of OP?
 
@user193661 Maybe by their name?
 
For future readers, who may not realize the connection
 
@user193661: by @name would work I guess
 
The printer must have been doing close to 300% ink coverage (rich black) causing paper jams and multi-page feed errors when trying to duplex.
 
3:31 AM
@user193661 I'd probably just use 'the asker'.
 
The printer expended some 22% of the high-yield cyan ink cartridge and 18% of the high-yield magenta ink cartridge (both rated for 1100 pages!) at the end of the print job, including failed attempts.
Oddly enough, the black ink still reads 100%.
(The black ink is physically larger and holds much more ink than the color cartridges because most print jobs use significantly more black ink than C/M/Y ink.)
300% ink coverage is way too high. The limit should be closer to 240%. I've never dealt with a print job with content this close to registration black.
 
3:49 AM
@DragonLord Is it the fault of the person who did the powerpoint slides?
Maybe you could remove the background from them and just print black text on a white background
 
It's not just rich black. I print presentations duplex 4-up and the rich black on the first page covers about 80-85% of the paper surface.
The later pages use a deep purple background and are not as problematic.
I really don't know for sure, but rich black on this printer is probably somewhere around 250-300%.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:25 AM
Morning guys
 
wee.
ITS ALIVE!
(gigabyte distributor delivered the fixed brix. Which is no longer bricked.)
 
A bricked brix?
Sounds reasonable
 
Yes. It was a brick of a bricked brix.
 
5:54 AM
Is it frowned upon to ask a question in here? God there's this site that I can't remember the name of to save my lifeeeee
 
@Insane No, go ahead and ask :)
 
Thank god. Right so it's this minimal-design site with a black background, full of .swf's that loop
FOUND IT. Deep within the pages of Google searching for "site with swf black background". It's index.z0r.de if anyone's wondering ;)
 
> site with a black background, full of .swf's that loop
That matches like 90% of all websites I visit!
 
Bob
6:33 AM
@OliverSalzburg under duress*
 
7:17 AM
Proud to say I spent this whole time going through flash loops
 
7:59 AM
for certain values of self respect pride ;p
 
1.7M O_O
 
Bob
What is this?
 
CrashPlan Backup overview
 
Bob
8:14 AM
oh
 
 
2 hours later…
10:06 AM
Alex Warren on September 29, 2015
Is your current job awesome? Or could you be doing better?
 
Bob
10:46 AM
@allquixotic Ok, screw it. Ordered the G4 :)
Should arrive anytime within the next week.
 
Bob
11:17 AM
Just got an email
> Windows 10 is here...
uh, yea, did you miss the memo two months ago?
 
11:37 AM
Heheh
 
just got my first win10 upgrade issue.
it's broken my ODBC data sources.
 
(possible new ava ;p)
 
to replace the beautiful one you have?
 
@marcusdoesstuff: I tend to cycle between them ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Two of them are not like the others.
 
11:49 AM
@Bob: That's from windows 8/when @allquixotic had the sad windows face o doom as his ava and we were all doing it ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Ya, I know... I think I gave you that one :P
 
I don't seem an avatar on you at all @JourneymanGeek
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek tongueface.png
I also have a sathyaemoticon3.png :P (SU logo)
neutralface2.png
 
11:59 AM
I've never seen an av on Bob either
 
Bob
12:12 PM
o.O
@marcusdoesstuff looks like your gravatar is broken
maybe it's blocked at your workplace
 
@marcusdoesstuff: then you would be confused by all the animal jokes ;p
 
Bob
Just for reference:
You can see how I started, which coincidentally was sparked by a chat convo :P
Oct 18 '12 at 21:58, by KronoS
@Bob you should name yourself Microsoft Bob for the next few week ;)
Oct 18 '12 at 22:39, by allquixotic
@Bob lol @ your grav
 
12:55 PM
fixed it :)
i had ghostery blocking it :P
oh dear... finding errors that have no results on google.
(to do with ODBC Data Sources)
 
1:37 PM
Just put up my first question, that I've answered myself.
0
A: ODBC Data Source Driver Issue

marcusdoesstuffIt is likely that I uninstalled the MS database drivers when I uninstalled the older version of Office and the new one must not come with the drivers as standard. The drivers I needed were within the 'Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable' that is currently available at the follo...

Written okay or should I change anything/provide more info?
 
Bob
@marcusdoesstuff Looks pretty good.
 
Thanks (and for the up votes if that was you) :)
 
Oh hey CloudFlare, didn't notice you there.
Is SU 5xx-ing (and/or slow) for anyone else?
 
Ask a silly question...
We are aware of some intermittent connectivity issues to Stack Overflow and all Stack Exchange sites, we are investigating now.
 
Bob
1:46 PM
@bertieb It's not much slower than usual. (read: yes, it is slow :P)
 
Heh :P Someone must be using the tin cans and string for something...
 
The hamsters unicorns must be tired
 
Thanks @Bob. Yes it is 365 software... It is fully offline 2013 office though.
@Bob I might need to experiment with these solutions too as although everything looks fine on the ODBC admin panel, I'm having problems connecting to the database with my python script.
 
2:13 PM
it's because their stack is Windows :P /troll
 
;p
Apparently its cloudflare related
 
@Bob the cats and dogs look conspicuously out of place there...
 
We have disabled railgun while we look into the issue with @CloudFlare. All sites are online now, though slower for users in remote regions.
er
 
2:29 PM
@JourneymanGeek Define "remote".
 
no idea
anywhere where its slower?
 
Hmm, I read that as 'We have acquired a railgun while we look into the issue"
2
Also, poor user who they are looking for :)
 
@terdon Anywhere it takes more than a day to reach, on horseback, with your data packets i guess.
 
@marcusdoesstuff Yes, but from where?
 
Who knows? It's all in the cloud now!
 
2:41 PM
New York is remote as far as I'm concerned :)
 
It's all remote.
 
lol
SE's servers are in NJ I think
 
It's a bit like asking 'how long's a piece of string?'
 
with the backups in OR
 
3:14 PM
I thought I'd solved this problem with ODBC Data Sources... It stopped showing the error... But I can't connect via PYODBC still. :(
The DSN looks like it's correctly defined already.
 
Bob
@allquixotic Hm, seems like I'll be missing the water-repellent coating of the Style, but I won't have to try to trim my micro-SIM into a nano-SIM.
Also, are there any flagships still 1920x1080? o.O
Oh, HTC One M9.
 
@Bob iPhone 6S Plus :D trololololololololol
you're free to roast me for that one, but I'm not wrong
 
Bob
@allquixotic Wait, they finally switched to 16:9?
@allquixotic I'd actually prefer that res. IMO 2560x1440 is a needless waste of resources.
 
@Bob yep, it's honest to god 1080p (plus Retina, whatever that does - to my eyes it looks like "normal" 1080p)
 
Bob
Looks like the G4 benchmarks decently well, but loses out on GPU perf. Not that that affects me much, considering about the most GPU usage I'll get is from the web browser. phonearena.com/news/…
 
3:24 PM
that would depend on which websites you visit, since some websites will make enough draw calls to keep the GPU very busy (with a hw-accelerated browser like FF or Chrome)
 
Bob
@allquixotic "Retina" is basically Apple marketing.
There's no consistent definition.
 
static HTML would be CPU-bound; lots of dynamic crap or HTML Canvas or video would be possibly GPU-bound
 
Bob
It's a wishy-washy (and trademarked) way of saying "it looks sharp from a certain loosely-defined distance".
Basically translates to "at least X DPI optimal for viewing at Y distance".
 
@Bob fair enough, which is why I'm not hailing it as anything significant or even visible to my eyes ;p
 
Bob
@allquixotic It comes down to what distance they expect you to view it at (hence desktop/laptop and phones differ) and the DPI.
 
3:26 PM
well, by that definition, the Note 5 is a better "Retina" display than the iPhone 6S Plus.
since it's even "sharper" due to more pixels
 
Bob
Ya.
 
being an engineer/technologist while owning an iPhone is an interesting experience, to say the least: there are many valid technical things Apple gets right; it's not 100% marketing bluff; BUT you have to apply a reality filter to anything you read about their products, to dispel the Reality Distortion Field :P
 
Bob
When they first came out with the "Retina" name, IIRC, it was kinda special - most people didn't really care about DPI or res on a phone screen.
 
granted, Cook has significantly less RDF around him than Jobs did
 
Bob
Oh, apparently there is a solid definition for "Retina".
 
3:29 PM
I feel like today's Apple is different from the iPhone 1.0 Apple with Jobs at the helm. It's less revolutionary, but there's also significantly less "magic" in the product, and more of a focus on actual results.
For instance, the A9 is legitimately fast.
 
Bob
> the iPhone 6 Plus, which renders its display at triple the number of pixels in each direction, before down-sampling to a 1080p resolution
o.O
I... don't see the point of that.
And it's uncited from Wikipedia.
 
@Bob it sounds similar to VSR
 
Bob
> With the iPhone 6 Plus, Apple took the unusual route of rendering apps at 3× scale into a backing store of 1,242-by-2,208 “logical” pixels which the GPU then scales down to the device’s native full HD screen resolution of 1,920-by-1,080 pixels.
 
(where your GPU renders at 4K then downsamples to 1080p)
 
Bob
Ah.
2208x1242 is reasonable.
That's not triple in each direction, though.
Nowhere near.
Still, doing that at all sounds... stupid, actually.
I don't see the benefits.
Especially when the rendering surface doesn't map to the real display at a power of two.
You will end up with artefacts.
Wait, 3x scale?
What's with everyone saying 3x scale?
Or, worse, 3x in each direction?
Has everyone forgotten how to do maths?
Is this Apple marketing?
What?!
(2208*1242) / (1920*1080) = 1.3225
2208/1920 = 1.15
1242/1080 = 1.15
There's no way to arrive at 3x...
> “Just do what Apple recommends and treat the iPhone 6 Plus as a 414×736@3× device and you’re gonna be fine in all but the most extreme corner cases,” he summed up.
Ohhh 3x the crappy old resolution.
...yep, definitely marketing. Claim 3x and everyone thinks they mean 3x 1920x1080
what
@allquixotic AFAICT, "Retina" is actually worse than the competition.
Apps still work within 414x736.
With apparently no way to make pixel-precision adjustments.
That sounds like a really weird design decision.
The only plus side is they completely remove the burden (and ability) from app devs, so they avoid problems like Windows has been having with DPI scaling.
Still, Android seems to have dealt with that just fine...
That seems expensive (GPU resources) and inaccurate :\
Especially in the final downsampling step.
> I'm hoping someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but here's the situation: earlier generation iPhone's had a scaling factor of 1x. iPhone 4, 4S, etc. up to 5S used 2x scaling on UI elements, making it easy for developers and meaning the UI scales perfectly. With the iPhone 6 Plus, the resolution is not a perfect increase in scaling (ie. not 3x, but more like 2.25x). This created problems with developing apps and aliasing on the screen. Basically things might look wrong.

But it seems Apple has gotten around this by rendering the assets for the iPhone 6 Plus at 3x (which exceeds the actual
 
3:50 PM
I wouldn't normally suggest, and cross-posting aside, I would suggest a VTR for:
0
Q: How to split and join without transcoding AVC/MPEG-TS video files in Windows with ffmpeg?

cipricusI am looking also for a Linux solution (in a separate question) I have two recorded video files with the extension .ts. I need to remove some part of the first, split the second, and then merge the first file with the first (split) part of the second file. They both have the same characteristic...

 
Bob
(they apparently develop a product to let you graphically edit images that are defined in Obj-C)
Because of course there's no native SVG support...
 
Not sure if that's better mentioned in 'ask an SU mod', but there ya go
 
Bob
The real irony: using C# (and Mono) to hack in SVG icons in iOS => stackoverflow.com/questions/20718655/…
Android doesn't seem to support that either => stackoverflow.com/questions/9647770/…
 
Mind you, I might be a little personally invested in that Q, so bias beware.
 
Bob
Nor WinPhone, but that one does use XAML, which is more-or-less directly compatible, at least.
@bertieb Looks good.
 
4:08 PM
@Bob Ta!
 
4:40 PM
@Bob SVGs look great, but there are numerous problems with them. They're CPU-intensive compared to raster graphics; there are many potential "gotchas" in implementing a renderer that can lead to security bugs; and it's difficult/impossible to know if the rendering process for an SVG will ever terminate, so do you let it go "a little longer" or kill it because it's hogging CPU? and mutation of SVG elements can be expensive (have to re-render).
not a great idea for a phone, overall
 
Bob
@allquixotic The security issues can be mitigated by running it within the app's security context.
Raster images can't be mutated in the same way.
End of the day, I'm not sure it's much worse than having to ship three different sizes of every raster image.
 
would be great to support them, but it's probably not coming to either of the major phone platforms until rendering performance of the browser is more than sufficient for just rasterized sites (I really like the perf of Safari on the 6S+, but it's still a far cry from even a low-end Sandy laptop CPU)
 
Bob
@allquixotic I'm not talking browsers. I'm talking icons in apps.
 
let's get rasterized images working well before we worry about SVG :P
ahh
 
Bob
Browsers are completely different.
Untrusted SVGs, lots of re-rendering, etc..
(speaking of which, pretty sure FF on Android supports SVGs, as does Chrome and probably even Safari on iOS)
App icons are relatively static.
 
4:43 PM
yeah, when desktop Firefox had a long-standing SVG rendering bug, it makes you wonder
(the one we reported after discovering it here)
 
Bob
It seems like SVG would've solved Apple's problem better than what they came up with.
Instead, it sounds like they went with weird scaling rules (2x and 3x so far) to make life easier (?) for app devs.
@allquixotic Safari might perform well, but I'm telling you as a webdev that I absolutely hate Safari.
Worse than (modern) IE in many ways.
Then there's iOS's weird state resuming behaviour that makes maintaining a single-page webapp an absolute pain in the arse.
(not strictly my job, but a coworker basically gave up on it after a couple weeks)
Then there's how it actually interprets image EXIF data and rotates them on webpages - without rotating the whole page, mind.
In what world is that a sane decision?!
> quirksmode.org expired on 05/22/2016 and is pending renewal or deletion.
O_O
that... doesn't look right
It expired in the future but is now taken down?
wat.
 
<sarc> NSL? maybe they wanted to hide the dirty secrets of quirky browser behavior so they can exploit it? ;p
 
Bob
4
Q: How can I force iOS safari to ignore EXIF rotation?

KallDrexxIt seems we have an issue that images on the desktops are displaying correctly upright, but on an iPad they are being rotated to landscape. Upon further investigation it seems that the iPad looks at the rotation information from EXIF data on the image and determining it should be displayed in la...

That's never been fixed, AFAIK.
I'm not even sure if they consider it a bug.
Despite going contrary to every expectation of a webdev.
Now, that might arguably be correct behaviour... hm.
 
welp - despite having relatively pedestrian RAM (though LPDDR4!), the GPU in this thing is no slouch: notebookcheck.net/…
> The PowerVR GT7600 is clearly the fastest smartphone GPU on the market as of September 2015. In all of our benchmarks, the GPU is able to beat even the fastest tablet and smartphone GPUs like the PowerVR GXA6850 in the A8x (iPad Air 2), Tegra K1 (Nvidia Shield Tablet) and Adreno 430 (various flagship smartphones). The ARM Mali-T760 MP8 (7420 Octa) in the Galaxy S6 line-up is also no match for the PowerVR GPU.
plays Hearthstone really well ;p
 
Bob
@allquixotic They'd need it, with all that upscaling and downscaling -_-
 
4:59 PM
if apps are restricted to as small of a rendering window as you say, though, that means the GPU is only doing shaders, etc. on a very small framebuffer, and textures in VRAM are very small, etc... kind of a smart trick
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (1880 days earlier)      last day (3142 days later) »