« first day (1170 days earlier)      last day (4146 days later) » 

00:00
@Hennes I don't see any reference to my name. You speak of adblockers but what this has to do with me?
@barlop @Hennes Here: imgur.com/a/WGfsf -> empty pages
@Ariane Is drive detected where image is located?
Images loaded from external sites -> blocked
@Boris_yo ......What? ANyway I don't feel like dealing with you, sorry. I'll just give up on this whole image thing.
@Hennes Something with your ISP? Imgur works for everyone.
00:01
@Ariane Did you go on the command prompt and execute the commands?
No, this works once I turn off add-blockers, request policy etc etc all off
@Mr.IDon'tCare Yes.
I am guessing you got an error?
@Hennes My AdBlock Plus is active while navigating Imgur.
@Ariane I took it as offense.
@Boris_yo I'm incredibly annoyed right now, so it's likely that I'll offense whoever I talk to. Sorry.
00:04
Ah, you need to manually click on the wheel and select 'view full resolution' before you get to see the image
@Mr.IDon'tCare Mountvol didn't seem to give an error. Tried to dir to my folder but it failed.
@Hennes It's like Imgur is hosting their data on 3rd party company which is blacklisted...
@Hennes Still, previews should be working for you.
Yup. Plenty of links to external sites
And google-analytics is always blocked. No need for them to know everything from me
@Hennes I don't see resource that host images in this list.
Still, full paranoid mode, a lot of blockers, anti-cross-site plugins, a 700KiB host file.... All of this and I still prefer it over a web full of adds
00:09
I think I must be the only one on Earth who doesn't mind ads much.
@Hennes I don't mind ads as long as they are not resource hogging and intrusive.
If the ad moves (animates gif or movie) I either leave the page or block it.
Always.
@Ariane I no longer own a TV since I could not watch it without running into adds.
I really hate adds
I see.
@Hennes And tell me how you hate ads that have "x" on them to close obviously but when you click it redirects?
uhm. I never click on them.
00:12
@Hennes I hate ads on TV much more now than ever because of increased volume to suddenly wake you up from sleep and brainwash you loudly with latest B.S
Either leave the page. Block it somehow or edit the page.
@Hennes I have no choice if I extremely need to view content and that "x" ad is in front of it.
The I start firebug or use websacarab (a proxy) so I can edit the HTML of the webpage
@Hennes What do you mean "by edit the page"? Is it caching that webpage and changing its coding in order to access it?
wtf... everything in Windows 8.1 is horrendously slow
clicking "Details" in Task Manager takes 5 seconds
00:14
@Hennes Okay and can you always access that webpage you changed in the future as long as you want?
@Boris_yo that guy was not totally wrong, just has a different perspective on the situation.
I mean things like this
@allquixotic I am about to install 8.1 from windows 7. That is probably the last thing i'd like to hear.
No need to use a cached version. Just edit the loaded page directly
@tricasse Welcome to Root Access chat for Super Users! I am this channel's helpful chat bot. Please don't ask if you can ask or if anyone's around; just ask your question, and if anyone's free and interested they'll help. For bot commands, type !!listcommands
00:15
Firebug is aimed at web developement, but that is not its only use
@Hennes If I edit loaded page directly, can I remove annoying ad with "x"?
@Mr.IDon'tCare it's probably some software on my system, don't worry ;)
Yes. That anoying "X" is in code. You can delete that code
@allquixotic That's not normal. Windows 8.1 is supposed to be faster than 8 (which itself was faster than 7) and nothing so far has contradicted that to me.
Or if the page uses frames delete the entire iframe with adds. Thus regaining all that space on the screen.
At least, until you load the page next time
00:16
morning
@Ariane I think it's just a long boot-up procedure, combined with "SuperFetch" not performing optimally on the first boot after an upgrade
@Mr.IDon'tCare You decided to upgrade that fast? Did you have to order license key?
it will probably get better over time, and if it's an actual bug, I'm sure a critical update will fix it
A lot of websites have useless stuff in columns. So I just edit thos eout
@Boris_yo Dreamspark :D
00:17
Ah, well if you have a lot of slow startup programs, it's different. :p
this is an awful message to receive from your hosting provider:
> We have taken our billing and support portal offline due to a major security risk.
@Hennes Just requires some coding expertise which I have low amount of.
g'evening @JourneymanGeek
@allquixotic: oh, might be WHMCS or whatver its called.
g'morning @JourneymanGeek
g'afternoon @JourneymanGeek
@JourneymanGeek it is!
00:17
@Boris_yo Plus, I decided if there is an error, Ill just use them restore disks to get back Win 7.
@Hennes Navigation is in columns often...
Not much is needed for destructive stuff. E.g. look at SU's page and the sound it makes when your name gets mentioned.
I could edit that se.mp3 and point it to an MP3 on-line
@Hennes please stop; your lack of UI styling on your widgets is making my eyes bleed @__@
uhm, no my design
@Hennes Nice. HTML5 is also MP3 compatible I see?
00:20
I think it just uses the codecs you have on hand
@JourneymanGeek MP3 decoding is worldwide royalty-free now, so I wouldn't be surprised if it's there
encoding, now that's another thing entirely
@JourneymanGeek Is there currently ExpressCard for laptops with 2.0 revision that offers SuperSpeed USB 3.0?
@JourneymanGeek I checked reviews on DX and Amazon and most say that speed is twice or thrice better than USB 2.0 but nowhere near USB 3.0.
-2
A: Which is best for ReadyBoost? SD card or USB?

MitchThe device with the higher transfer rate will better support ReadyBoost. Run an copy from the harddisk to each to find out which has higher transfer rate.

mabey a better way to have said it is IT DEPENDS :-)
00:32
@Psycogeek Why cares about transfer rate. The internal HDD will have a much higher sequential transfer rate
@Hennes well my point would be that i just spent 1/2 the day reading crap on the web. about how Usefull all this stuff is. The people with the knowlege were being Assulted on the forums, for being CORRECT damnit
now i show up here and again, a different perspetive on a situation is derided for being incorrect.
3 threads at Hard forum here is one example hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1599553&page=3 SSDs are set properly via the OS . ok so maybe they are mabey they arent. but 3 times now on my system it was not. it takes Pages of people blowing info out, without testing anything. then at the last page :-) well you know.
@Hennes Pure random IO on a HDD is more likely to be around 5MB/sec, depending on the model). – Hennes 1 min ago
Can you calculate access time for those 5MB/s?
Facts not in evidence. poor testing, zero testing. assumptions made based on other bad information on the web. then repeated so many times that it is the only truth left. That is the frustration.
Nope. And those will vary per model anyway
@Hennes I just want to understand difference between trransfer rate and access time. How one influences another?
00:41
I got up to 14MB/sec with a RAID-0 of 10K RPM @.5 inch SAS drives and about 30 videostreams hitting it (20 write, 10 read, 32 bit OS so not much RAM to cache the data)
Boris, compare it to a book.
the access time it how long you need to turn the book to a certain page
the transfer rate is how fast you can read
If you read a single chapter then you will read many sequential pages.
So there will be minimal turning of pages.
If you read a 100 random pages then you are spaning a lot of time flipping to the page you want to read.
a spinning HDD has no pages, but it needs to move the r/w heads around, and that takes time. And then it has to wait for the right part to pass underneath the head. On average that takes half a revolution.
@Hennes The difference between human and hard disk is that human reads sequentially and hard drive reads sequentially and randomly.
humans can read randomly too ;p
Well, if I have a book (say a dictionary) and 10 people asking me to explain words (at the same time) then I am going to do a lot of page turning.
I need to clarify that I wanted to know difference between random writes and random access time.
And if they are in a hurry I might read the first part from a dictionary page, then turn to the page for the second person, read that first part, then turn to the third person.
etc etc
And then return to the first word again later to read the rest
00:48
@Hennes Oh yeah it would make good NAND person from you.
To write something you need to go to the place to write it.
Just replace my page turning and reading to page turning and writing
@Hennes Right. Let me also add language dictionary.
It gets more complex if you add caching
Let me backtrack a lot with a few simpel questions:
If you take the random write aspect of the flash it sucks so bad . but without knowing how the system would use it in the particular use , i wouldnt know how that part would effect it. the readycrap is not a paging file, it is some kind of cache.. even if it was being written in 4K chunks. would the system be as crasy as the benchmarks are , at trying to put the chunks all over the place?
do you remember an LP (large black disc with music on in)
The LP (Long Play), or 33â…“ rpm microgroove vinyl record, is a format for phonograph (gramophone) records, an analog sound storage medium. Introduced by Columbia Records in 1948, it was soon adopted as a new standard by the entire record industry. Apart from relatively minor refinements and the important later addition of stereophonic sound capability, it has remained the standard format for vinyl albums. Format advantages At the time the LP was introduced, nearly all phonograph records for home use were made of an abrasive (and therefore noisy) shellac compound, employed a much lar...
The LP only has one single recording on it.
00:51
@Psycogeek If you say ReadyBoost is cache and not page file based, why not improve performance additionally and fully move pagefile.sys to flash drive with ReadyBoost?
One a computer that would not be practical. So we used a different layout where we split the disk in circles (tracks)
@JourneymanGeek He obviously likes experiencing nausea.
@Boris_yo Dont even bring that up :-) I got enough problems trying to get any Facts on the One thing. some aspect of this ready junk seems to be operating in the system reguardless of it being set up on a flash disk.
I fully broke my system with a bluescreen, when i had it all 100% off. the system would not even boot anymore.
@Psycogeek You actually tested ReadyBoost?
@Psycogeek Oh wait. Idea! How about running ReadyBoost on 4 flash drives? :D That's 4x speed!
00:56
@Boris_yo ok readyBoost. good lets get the terms correct. Ready boost driver itself when turned off hoses my system.
I am havin a very hard time finding Facts , when the people who know them are laughed out of the forums. and (i kid you not) Banned, saw that 3 times today in my never ending quest for facts.
@Psycogeek Banned for speaking truth? Hmmm, just like on conspiracy theory stuff shared on TV and banned. Disinformation is king unfortunately.
@Psycogeek If it took you half day, it would take me at least 1 day.
The OCZ forum, has a very good layout of how the OS is NOt setting up for SSD, and had a 90% correct tweaks post. it was closed. Some information with "facts" in them are only found in the deep archive resesses of the web.
@Psycogeek Maybe something OCZ wouldn't like to be found?
@Boris_yo Well here my friends say they are catching Mac disease. once the windows system was leaned into being a mac, and everybody started having to Believe in it, because it takes a strong belief system :-) to like it anymore.
@Boris_yo There was no OCZ negative information. just that all heavy tweaking to an OS can cause more trouble for anyone (including me) . Plus the naysayers, luckily they didnt have the stupid arguments going on about it.
@Psycogeek But that tweaking although dangerous but is 90% correct?
01:09
@Boris_yo If you have a SSD , and windows, there are things you should check. Anything else you would have to have a good idea of what your doing, Why your doing it, and it would have to be usefull in your computers situation. Then you gotta have a backup, and you should Test it ON your actual system, before it would be assumed that it was "better".
why can't i VTC questions that i flagged for closure... :/
@Psycogeek YouTube offers 1440p. Can you believe it?
YouTube offers RAW now
Well, raw as in whatever it was uploaded as, so I suppose up to 4k perhaps
Anyway. Night all. 3:13 in the night. Sleep
@tapped-out because you already casted your vote, wait four days until the vote expires then you can vote it
01:14
i flagged it almost two weeks ago
lol well, just wait till everyone else votes
i still have flags from july that are active :P
(ie no one's happened to reach that question in the 600+ question review queue)
@Hennes Sleep
@Boris_yo NOOOOOO! Now he won't sleep :/
Believe it or not, I haven't even shut down my computer yet to install W8.1
Backup takes so long...
I have yet to understand why it takes so long to do any operation like Copy/Paste etc.
01:24
because backups exists only for trolling you, the same as OS's, computers, servers and strangers in a chat room :P
Bob
Bob
@tapped-out Flags don't end up in the review queue... they end up in the moderator tools queue.
@Braiam Well...
@Bob flags for closure end up in the review queue as of july
it's part of the reason (IMO) the close vote queue has gotten ridiculous. flags don't seem to expire
mm... weird, I was sure flags gotten into the >10k/mod review queue, that decides if the flags proceed then pass to the review queue
but oh well, AU is faster managing flags... oddly enough
01:47
Hey uhm. I just installed Ubuntu on a separate partition, and just like I wanted, there's no OS-choosing menu that delays startup. But there's a problem: When I press F11 for the boot menu, I can only select physical drives. I can't tell it to boot from the Linux partition. So ehm, what do I do?
@Ariane Windows 8 was preinstalled?
@Braiam Nope, I installed it myself. Why?
Or if you mean it was there before Ubuntu, yeah, it was.
@Ariane how exactly you made that there weren't any os-choosing menu?
@Braiam I didn't make it so. It just happened to be that way. I chose the custom partitioning option in the setup, and just put it on a new partition.
I smell that you messed it up... what boots if you leave it alone?
01:56
Windows.
Install grub
Ideally I'd want a manual option that always boots Windows unless I say otherwise. Does it allow that?
Not necessarily, but you can put the timer down to 1 second or something
So it would still be fast
nope if you don't install GRUB and configure it to do so
Bob
Bob
@tapped-out Ah, closure... I can't flag to close anymore, so... :P
01:59
Well. I'll try just that then
You would need 2 separate hard drives though
neither can i, but that's a more recent development for me than you
Bob
Bob
@Ariane well, if it's a MBR installation, not much
since the F11 option or whatever is just selecting physical media - it doesn't know what a partition is
@SimonSheehan why?
Bob
Bob
01:59
you get more choice if it were a GPT installation with UEFI
so there's still questions in the queue from my flagging days, and i can't VTC them :/
UEFI?? you mean nightmarEFI?
@Braiam Without using a bootloader such as GRUB, you can't choose between OS's properly, unless its on multiple drives, which isn't always convenient
Bob
Bob
You don't need to have GRUB as your default, either.
Windows' BOOTMGR is perfectly capable of chainloading GRUB, last I checked
Well its up to you - I'd rather have 1 bootloader, not two that need chainloading
02:01
@Bob Wasn't MBR an old, ancient thing that doesn't exist anymore in practical terms?
Bob
Bob
@SimonSheehan You always need to chainload two when you have both Windows and Linux.
GRUB can't load Windows directly - it chainloads BOOTMGR
Unless there's been a massive change recently.
@Bob That's why im suggesting GRUB, as you can configure it more than bootmgr
yeah, with GRUB you can configure the background image... :P
Bob
Bob
@SimonSheehan That's immaterial - if you want Windows to load by default, use BOOTMGR first and chainload GRUB from it.
It's far cleaner.
If you want a GRUB-managed OS to load first, use GRUB first and chainload BOOTMGR from it.
.....GRUB's install instructions are absolutely cryptic for a Windows user.
02:03
menuentry 'Windows 7 (loader) (on /dev/sdb1)' --class windows --class os $menuentry_id_option 'osprober-chain-AA64B45A64B42AC9' {
	insmod part_msdos
	insmod ntfs
	set root='hd1,msdos1'
	if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
	  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd1,msdos1 --hint-efi=hd1,msdos1 --hint-baremetal=ahci1,msdos1 --hint='hd1,msdos1'  AA64B45A64B42AC9
	else
	  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root AA64B45A64B42AC9
	fi
	chainloader +1
}
Bob
Bob
If you have EasyBCD or Visual BCD Editor, chainloading to GRUB is very easy.
isn't there a question somewhere about that? I can't seem to find it...
Bob
Bob
@Ariane Grab EasyBCD.
Add New Entry
Linux/BSD
Type: GRUB 2
"Please like EasyBCD on Facebook to continue to your download.." Lucky I do have a Facebook account.
Bob
Bob
Actually, follow these instructions:
4
A: How can I add an entry for Ubuntu to the Windows 7 boot menu?

irrational JohnThe procedure which has worked for me is outlined below. Did you perform the install of the NeoGrub bootloader in step (3)? If NeoGrub is installed then there will be a \NST folder on your C: drive. I think this step is sometimes left out of guides for setting up EasyBCD. Using EasyBCD to Boo...

@Ariane wtf
02:07
second
Ah it wasn't even required actually.
btw @Ariane you should have installed grub in Ubuntu already or it will not work
@Braiam How? I can't -boot- to Ubuntu.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane should've been installed by default
basically, the process we're going for is:
@Bob Makes sense. I did see "grub" somewhere in the fast text that flashes in quick succession in the install.
Bob
Bob
02:10
Windows:
System => MBR => Windows BOOTMGR => Windows

Linux:
System => MBR => Windows BOOTMGR => GRUB => Linux OS
The alternative is to swap it around so GRUB goes first and chainloads BOOTMGR
I'd recommend that for a Linux-default install
It's often also used for a Windows-default install too, but I believe that's because most people don't know that BOOTMGR even can chainload another loader
why the difference between a Linux default install? you can configure GRUB to boot into windows without problem IMHO
I think it's because it's a "dirtier" approach. Because you need to go fetch a Linux piece of software to launch Windows, while Windows is your main anyway.
Bob
Bob
@Braiam Because it delays the booting process, breaks things (especially if you are on a UEFI boot) and has more potential for breaking in general - it's just more complex for your default to go through more steps
wouldn't be the first time someone complained Windows stopped booting after upgrading or uninstalling Linux
GRUB_TIMEOUT=1 GRUB_DEFAULT=Windows FTW?
Bob
Bob
@Braiam you're still loading an additional piece of software, and that doesn't stop it from breaking things either
more than one report of issues hibernating from Windows when in such a configuration
02:14
Sucks that Ubuntu can't be installed on an NTFS partition. Then the drive wouldn't appear empty from Windows, heh.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane you could install it to FAT32, but not recommended :P
better to keep it on ext
Yeah, FAT32 is... Yeah.
Bob
Bob
@Braiam Another question is why not BOOTMGR?
@Bob why BOOTMGR?
Well, actually, the very best option would be for Windows to support more filesystems, but well.
Bob
Bob
02:15
@Braiam Because it's more straightforward and less buggy!
windows = less buggy... you sure?
@Braiam Because it's Windows software and just makes sense for loading Windows by default?
Bob
Bob
I just said that. For the last ten minutes or so.
@Braiam Yes I bloody well am sure.
@Bob your opinion :P
Bob
Bob
Loading GRUB => BOOTMGR => Windows introduces bugs
simple as that
02:16
@Bob where are the bug reports?
Bob
Bob
I will not get into a Linux vs Windows argument here
...
you're not even reading my messages are you
4 mins ago, by Bob
@Braiam Because it delays the booting process, breaks things (especially if you are on a UEFI boot) and has more potential for breaking in general - it's just more complex for your default to go through more steps
nope :P
Bob
Bob
4 mins ago, by Bob
wouldn't be the first time someone complained Windows stopped booting after upgrading or uninstalling Linux
2 mins ago, by Bob
more than one report of issues hibernating from Windows when in such a configuration
@Bob UEFI IS BROKEN!!
that was said all along for each distro
Bob
Bob
@Braiam No it's not.
UEFI is perfectly fine.
It's replacing a legacy system (do you have any idea how old BIOS/MBR is?) that's long overdue for replacement.
02:18
@Braiam Windows being less buggy by nature is debatable and up to argumenting. What he's SAYING is that obviously Windows software (bootmgr) loading a Windows OS is going to work better than Linux software (GRUB) loading a Windows OS. Just the same way as it would be inefficient to load bootmgr first when your default OS is Linux. Understood?
Bob
Bob
It's not breaking, and it's on just about every system, working perfectly fine. It also has bear perfect legacy MBR support on the vast majority of systems.
@Braiam I would argue that ReactOS is broken.
@Bob broken documentation + implementation = not the developer fault?
Bob
Bob
Skim reading, "As mentioned before, a literal number like 10 will be implicitly treated by the Microsoft C compiler as an int."
Did you eat fight cereals this morning? You're awfully aggressive.
@Ariane who? :P
You.
when I've been aggresive?
All along?
I've not been here great deal of the day... due some circumstances... but that doesn't mean that I'm aggresive, I'm being argumentative
02:22
Well to me those are roughly synonyms.
...
Anyway I'll test my new boot menu now. See you in a bit.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane There is one caveat to BOOTMGR-first: you won't be able to load GRUB/Linux while Windows is hibernated.
Depending on what you need, that may be a good or bad thing.
It's certainly far safer - simply mounting Windows while it's hibernated can destroy the file system
ok, lets see it this way, UEFI promised to be the deal breaker of the boot loaders, but I don't see all the OS's being able to use UEFI easily
Hi there! I'm on Ubuntu. (And actually this thing is way more comfortable to use than Mac OS).
(Even though I'm deeply troubled by how there's no taskbar. xD)
Anyway I wanted to ask, uhm.
Is there any way to access my Windows 8 partition from it without disabling fastboot (which would significantly increase boot time)? It would seriously be practical if there were.
@Bob This is probably related to the issue you speak of: I think fastboot is essentially a form of hibernation that completely replaces a "normal" shutdown.
I guess not.
Aw well.
Okay uhm I'm back on Windows.
02:44
Wassup All?! Finally on Windows 8.1! :)
Hi.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane uhm, yea, that could actually be a problem
fast boot shuts down user stuff and hibernates the kernel
@Bob Apparently it's impossible. No matter.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane you'd need to turn off fast boot or force a full shutdown (shutdown -s from command line) to boot to Linux, if BOOTMGR is first
@Ariane Use Kubuntu
KDE feels much nicer than Unity and even GNOME (to me) :P
02:46
I just need an external OS. Not gonna fiddle with what I prefer :p
Bob
Bob
Kubuntu is essentially Ubuntu with KDE
Again the only reason I needed Ubuntu was to delete system files.
Bob
Bob
it's otherwise the same thing :P
@Ariane ah, better to do a CD or USB boot, then...
@Bob Yeah but that requires looking around and stuff. Felt like installing it.
Right now I'm trying to figure out why, when I choose Ubuntu on the menu, it restarts the computer (with the motherboard splash screen again) and then takes me to GRUB which asks me to select Ubuntu again.
Bob
Bob
looking around? o.O
02:47
For the disc. xD
Bob
Bob
brb installing 79 "important" updates
Waaait. D:
Bob
Bob
I'll hop on the other computer in a bit
That's gonna take half a century. Any idea how I can tell it to just shut up and throw Ubuntu at me instead of asking me the same question again?
Oh okay then.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane where are you selecting Ubuntu?
UEFI menu or Windows bootloader menu?
02:50
Windows menu. The big stylized screen with big icons.
Bob
Bob
downloading 800 MB of updates D:
Haha.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane it loads GRUB which asks you again?
Yes.
Loads GRUB after completely rebooting and showing me the motherboard splash screen again.
Bob
Bob
hm. @Braiam seems to know how to tell GRUB to jump straight into its default option without a long wait
@Ariane that might be an artifact of how the chainloading is done
not sure if chainloading from GRUB would do something similar or not
02:52
@Bob mm?
I don't wanna do it anyway. :p
O_O
not gonna to read the backlog to get an idea and make assumptions :P
@Braiam Basically after the Windows bootloader shoots me over to GRUB after I chose Ubuntu, GRUB once again asks me to choose Ubuntu, and I'd like to prevent that.
So we're wondering if you'd know a way to tell GRUB to just shut up and throw Ubuntu at me when you cal lfor it.
you booted Ubuntu right now?
Nope.
02:56
reboot and get into ubuntu
Do I have something special to do in GRUB's menu? Because at that point we won't be in contact.
nope, just booting into Ubuntu will do
Okay, see you in a bit then

« first day (1170 days earlier)      last day (4146 days later) »