@LeeWoofenden Looks like it's not in beta yet, but anybody interested could help get it lanched into beta by voting up questions UNDER 10 that look like good SE questions (anything 10 or over is already helping to get the site to beta, the proposal needs more questions at the 10 threashold).
@LeeWoofenden Not answered. At least they are not suppossed to be. The idea there is to propose questions that would be examples of the scope of the site were they to try it. Once there are enough upvoted questions it goes to a stage to gather committers, then it would go into beta.
Any feedback on the questions there is supposed to only be about whether the question would be good for a potential future site or not to hash out what the general area of expertise / scope would be before drumming up people committed to that site direction.
@Caleb Just be careful to never give that advice in the Area51 discussion Q&A site... they very quickly jump to downvote anyone suggesting such tactical voting. Which is pretty dumb in my opinion. It's the only place on the network where upvotes are capped, voting there has a unique purpose, so voting practices can be different from usual.
The Upper Room
The Upper Room