« first day (623 days earlier)      last day (538 days later) » 

12:31 AM
@Phoenices I don't follow. You're annoyed enough to continue the conversation here ~24 hours ago, but not to verify. I get that you feel it would take reading 100s if pages to 'find the truth', it in reality you need to just read whatever was linked here.
It feels like by bringing it up, and stating that you won't verify the claims made here you perhaps want someone here to do that verification, but I've already picked up you perhaps don't trust the research done here
So my question is, what would it take to convince you that AngryGM was rightfully removed from the chat feeds?
 
 
2 hours later…
2:30 AM
Groody's comment above:
"Re: Angry DM. Apparently there are a lot of other interactions taken into consideration in a decision to not use links to his site, not that single comment above (which actually states he is not intending to critique race, but political system). I have no proof of them, and little appetite to go hunting. In judicial systems, there is probably a good reason behind the principle that someone is innocent unless proven guilty."
 
@Phoenices yes that is Groody's comment....?
 
@AncientSwordRage I see the one link; that doesn't appear in any way racist, unless critiquing a government is critiquing a people. Several of my relatives, who are wiser than me, hold that exact position on China, and I agree with them.
I see the quote. I also see the claim, by Groody, that the people who made the decision had quite a bit more information that drove the decision. I don't want to read a bunch of Angry GM stuff to find the information that drove it.
 
@Phoenices ok
What do you want?
 
I'd like to hang around for a bit and continue this, but I have a test to take; sorry about that.
 
@Phoenices an ok that makes sense
I should be in bed anyway
 

« first day (623 days earlier)      last day (538 days later) »