@bertieb - @JourneymanGeek Often tells me to just simply flag for moderation and walk away. I would say you can attempt to correct course once, but after that, let a moderator handle it.
@Ramhound yup, seems like a good approach; I was on board for trying to bring the guy round until his second edit (in response to my comments) and then I realised I wasn't going to get anywhere
Oh well, some folks aren't a good fit. (shrug) I could have found this out by checking their cross-site profile, as they've done the "100% information is already there" bit before, but hey ho
@JourneymanGeek Aye, I'm happy to escalate in the second instance (or first if it's especially problematic); community has a part to play too the way I see it :)
That said, if your [erstwhile? :S] employer has an issue which is that critical with it from a legal perspective I'm not sure "tell the employee to take it down"
But then I don't work in finance
(I am guessing)
Legal departments like to puff out their chests from time to time though
Hope you can get it sorted out with minimum further fuss 👍
You should be trying to recreate the problem in a script that is entirely yours, thus suggesting to an (edit?) so they can retract previous revisions, leaving a version of the question that can still be answered. Then of course you have the answer which has the domain name in it.
I only know that my employees told me to delete it fully. They also told me to delete it off google, but I'm not entirely sure if even deleting this post it would be removed from there or if I need a lawyer/dmca
Since the current revision removes the domain name, and the last two lines are not required, ad even the body of the foreach loop isn't really required. Honestly only the first three lines are required (with a blank loop block). So can't the information be retracted to that point creating the minimal recreation of the problem then disassociate the question from the user?
I agree the requests are unreasonable ("get various parties to agree to remove some scripting or pay a six figure sum!") but legal departments are not knowing for their generosity of spirit :-\
A DCMA request would require the bank to request it not the user. Bank owns the copyright, and under the penalty of a fine (LAUGH OUT LOUD), those requests must be truthful and by the owner of the copyrighted material.
@B.Frederik so... Even if I delete all the posts anyone who answered can see it
You're either going to want to contact SE with the contact us link or get your old employer to. Someone will review your flags and process them and I will try to let the other mods know