7:47 PM
I'm not understanding how this question was closed as not being focused, the focus is pretty simple: ffmpeg has an error when trying to resume a prior stream, but with a lot of context. Can any moderators help me understand how this is an issue of "not being focused" rather than "too much context"? My apologies if too much context isn't allowed, I just guessed that more information is better. superuser.com/questions/1726109/…
This chatroom looks like it isn't active and hasn't been for quite a while (that, or it's glitching and only showing very old messages), so I'll just leave some very painfully accurate humor for others who end up here with similar complaints. It's quite spot-on, especially over the past 5 years or so, which is why I often delete my accounts on SE websites: quora.com/Why-are-the-users-of-Stack-Overflow-so-mean/answer/…
3 hours later…
10:28 PM
@Herewegoagain It can be kinda frustrating, but closing questions is kinda overloaded- some questions are closed because they aren't and wont ever be good fits for various reasons; other questions are closed so that they can be improved to where they can be usefully answered
regarding the so-called humour... I mean yeah, it seems like no-one is happy with the SE experience- newbies com,plain they can't get their questions answered and it's too unfriendly, oldies complain they nobody asks good questions anymore and they have to wade through crap to find gems, so to speak
it's like the old, "nobody goes there anymore because it;s too crowded", "nobody drives there because there's too much traffic" chestnuts
as an aside, having hung out here and having hung out on the ffmpeg-user mailing list for some time... I'll take here, if I had to pick
front-load it: say "TLS errror interrupts rtmp stream with ffmpeg" or similar as a title, post the error and the full, uncut console output (without anything like -hide_banner), with a little context
maybe consider including your subquestions in around here somewhere- "I don't understand 1) XYZ, 2) ABC, 3) foobar 4) baz and quux 5) 42? "
what you have isn't far away from that, but it takes a little bit of digging to get to the actual meat of your question
« first day (4286 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (690 days later) »