« first day (1775 days earlier)      last day (3203 days later) » 

12:57 AM
@random is this where I can get some mod help?
 
@meed96 Yes—if you need to talk to a mod, just bring up your concern here.
 
Yeah
My question got flagged as opinion based and I beg to differ...
 
I'm not a mod, although I'm always in this room.
 
Ah...right...
 
Can you post a link to the question?
 
12:59 AM
4
Q: Why is 1366x768 resolution a thing?

meed96I know that there's a previous question about this (here: What's with the 1366x768 resolution for laptops/notebooks?) But it doesn't have any real answers despite having been viewed 12,400 times, and the fact that it's been closed. With that in mind... Why in the world is 1366x768 resolution a r...

 
Voted to reopen; it's a technical question asking for technical answers.
 
Thanks :D
 
It may be a good idea if you reworded it to specifically ask for technical explanations, so that it's not as open-ended.
 
Well I did sort of ask some specifics in the question itself
 
> Why don't laptops use 1280x720 or something else as a standard?
 
1:01 AM
Why is it a standard in laptops while being such a break from the normal 16:9, etc.
Yeah
 
...can appear to be opinion-based.
Better wording can help here.
 
Well
When most laptops ship with this resolution
And this resolution happens to be so weird (odd aspect ratio, not normal 16:9)
I ask why aren't laptops made standard to 16:9?
There must be a technical reason the standard was broken, not an opinionated reason.
And if you read the answers, they are very technical answers, no opinions among them.
 
 
2 hours later…
2:53 AM
@meed96 Its a thing cause its a semi standard resolution found in shitty TVs ;p
Its also in between 720p and 1080p
and ugh. We FINALLY HAVE DECENT RESOLUTIONS AVAILABLE
 
 
11 hours later…
1:45 PM
@meed96 Because it's asking why in the face of industry norms would there be a want for something else
A non-cited Wikipedia quote dump as the accepted answer makes the whole question premise less favourable
 
2:02 PM
@random But the question has a lot of interest around it, even if the answer is a bit vague, closing it down seems counter to the goal of SE.
 
@random I would leave it open, someone can post a better answer.
I generally try not to close in borderline cases.
The question has a valid answer, it just needs to be worded better.
 
I like the idea of erring on the side of caution in edge cases.
 
Interest doesn't mean it's in scope, just that it's hit the Hot Network Questions list. A lot of questions that end up there usually need to be closed
 
That very fact makes me wonder if SE has the right goal :P
Shutting down all the popular questions
 
@JourneymanGeek, what are your thoughts here?
 
2:05 PM
Doesn't matter if someone could post a better answer if the question itself isn't right for the site
 
@DragonLord I tend to agree with him there tho
 
Yes, it's broad and a bit opinion-based. No, it can be worded better.
 
A moderator always makes hard line decisions, it's the nature of binding actions
 
There are good technical reasons for 1366x768.
 
Which would take it out of opinion based entirely.
 
2:07 PM
I try to leave things like this to the community to decide.
 
@DragonLord besides, if I disagreed with him (which I'm not), it would be in private
@DragonLord: then someone would ask the same question about 1080, 720, 4K, 8K, 16K....
 
And the answer would be that those are all a continuation of the 16:9 standard, or etc.
I guess they just don't have enough interest to prompt a question.
 
Well, this might need a discussion on Meta.
 
Moderators don't always have to come in and vote, it's fine. We just leave it up to the community then
Didn't see a borderline issue, so just voted normally
 
Out of curiosity: I've noticed whimsical text in your edit summaries for a very long time. What's the idea behind this?
 
2:10 PM
@DragonLord @meed96: this is a perfect example of there being a fine line between a popular and an off topic question BTW
 
Does it make the moderation process more fun (and less prone to causing burnout)?
 
(and the fact it was user reopened, after a mod closes it)
 
Yeah I know there's a lot of stuff off topic, but to be realistic there's no good place to ask a question like this and actually get a good answer.
If there was another website that took all of our off-topic questions and answered them in the professional way that SE does, I'd go there.
 
But I'm forced to ask really really interesting questions here and hope I can get an answer instead of it being flagged as opinion based or off topic or something.
 
2:12 PM
I try to base decisions involving questions like this based on whether it's "good subjective" or "bad subjective":
Robert Cartaino on September 29, 2010
Stack Exchange is about questions with objective, factual answers. We've been crystal clear about this for as long as I can remember, even back to the earliest, pre-beta days of Stack Overflow. It's right there in the standard Stack Exchange FAQ:
 
@meed96: But they can get reopened
(also, this is my second most popular question superuser.com/questions/699278/… )
 
@JourneymanGeek It turns into a battle for "Should we even answer this question?" instead of a battle to find the best answer.
 
closures happen
 
Which is really. really. Annoying.
 
@meed96: I answer stuff anyway
 
2:14 PM
Yeah see your question is a good point of this Journeyman
 
If it interests me
 
Closed as too broad while at the same time having a perfectly acceptable answer.
 
Well, there's a clear logic there
there's many ways to do it
 
It seems to be very contradicting
 
and the story behind it is ludicious
 
2:16 PM
"Answers would be too long for our format" accepted answer written immediately below in SE format
 
great questions are focused, have a single best/correct answer yet entertaining
 
9 mins ago, by DragonLord
Yes, it's broad and a bit opinion-based. No, it can be worded better.
 
Yes but not all questions are great
Some aren't great, and still need answers.
SE is a site for celebrity questions.
 
Well, that's an example of a populist question, that wasn't quite up to people bothering to reopen it
 
Stack Exchanges likes clickbait, that's for sure.
 
2:18 PM
@DragonLord Interesting way to put it, but makes sense.
 
(heh, meed's question was tweeted so... someone liked it)
 
Through the official account?
 
erm
lettmecheck
 
49
Q: Why do computers count from zero?

DragonLordComputers traditionally tally numerical values starting from zero. For example, arrays in C-based programming languages start from index zero. What historical reasons exist for this, and what practical advantages does counting from zero have over counting from one? Note: This question asks for...

 
@JourneymanGeek Found it
 
2:19 PM
Why does 1366x768 resolution exist? http://superuser.com/q/946086?atw=1 #laptop
(had a long day at work ;p)
 
It just seems so silly to my mind to have really popular questions that provide good information any oh why not slap a "your question isn't acceptable here" sticker on it at the same time.
If we started deleting those flagged questions instead I think people would complain a lot.
Tl:dr, I'm still trying to understand the SE philosophy
 
@meed96 that's tricky
At the end of the day the community sets the rules
Mods have the ability to close (and other things) but we're primarily human exception handlers
2
 
So should I expect to see SE evolve over time if people's opinions change?
 
@JourneymanGeek Precisely.
 
But doesn't SE have some rules set in place by the company itself? Rules that don't just fade off easily?
 
2:25 PM
rarely
 
Closures are an extension of the work moderators are expected to do. The main task is to handle conditions that the community cannot handle on its own. Stack Exchange is designed to be community-moderated to the extent possible.
To this end, the moderator's primary task is to evaluate and resolve flags.
 

« first day (1775 days earlier)      last day (3203 days later) »