Editor decides. Reviewers do not.

Did you receive any information as to why your paper was rejected? Right now, it seems like you are dissatisfied with the rejection simply due to the low number of comments – which does not indicate that anything was awry: I once recommended to reject a paper with a single crucial comment, which toppled the entire paper.

Are the comments all so "trivial" as the ones you mention? Or was their a crucial comment as in Wrzlprmft's comment? Was your entire paper toppled?

"six comments that I have enough justifications for." Enough justification for what? Major revision? Minor revision? Or something else? Please be clear on this

I'm confused. Did the reviews not contain any type of assessment of the paper?

This happened to me also. I assume that due to COVID situation they can't find good reviewers

Are you sure you have all the information? In the fields I am familiar with, the reviewers can enter both "comments for the author" and "comments for the editor" - and the latter ones are only seen by the editor, not the author. They may have commented to the editor that while there are no major problems with your paper, it is simply not interesting enough for the journal, or relevant enough for its intended readership.

Yes, I have all the info.

@lighthousekeeper no they did, but I feel it is not enough to reject the paper, it can go for some revision though.

@scaaahu Enough justification for their comments. Minor revision I would say.

If two comments are repeated by both reviewers, wouldn't you have 8 comments to handle? (the 6 you're referring to, plus these two comments)

It doesn't matter if you feel the comments aren't enough to warrant a rejection. It's not as though the paper is default to be accepted unless the reviewer can prove otherwise. There is nothing you can or should do about it except improve the paper as best you can on the basis of the comments you received and move on to the next journal.

My old professor once told me "Rejection is default. You need to convice me otherwise." One comment would be one too many. Zero comments would still not warrant publication.

You don't know what the refrerees said in confidential comments to the editor.

@winny: One comment would be one too many <-- What exactly do you mean by that?

@user111388 One comment about the tables being mis-numbered, citation missing, typo or anything similar is enough byt itself to reject it.

@winny: That is pretty harsh and I do not agree that ine comment about a typo should be enough to reject a paper by itself. Indeed I have probably never read a paper without a typo. In my ideal world, such a typo would be pointed out and corrected by the author, but a good paper should not be rejected because of that.

@user111388 When you are the editor of a publication, professor or have a similar position, feel free to apply that rule to the papers you review.

@winny: I do think that every editor etc. applies this rule today -- do you not? Otherwise, there would be no paper at all. (When I review a paper, I do as a say - I point out "there is a typo" but once single typo does not effect my recommendation about the paper).

@user111388 I don't think any way or another in the subject, I just relay what my professor told me about his review process. Yours may be different.

@winny: Ah okay, thank you for the clarification! (Your comment sounded like you would give this advice"One comment is one too many" to the OP".) (It sounds like the prof just wanted to avoid work "Hey! I found a missing comma in the introduction, so I write this down and can recommend rejection and the review is done!"