« first day (403 days earlier)      last day (265 days later) » 

5:43 AM
@robjohn hi
sir can u help me in understanding the derivation of linear differentiation equation of nth order
let i assume differential equatio to be ...
→.
$n\frac {dy^n}{dx}+n-1\frac{dy^{n-1}}{dx}....................\frac{dy}{dx}=0$
how do I evaluate it
what I did I assumed a standard solution of the equation to be y=cx
so solution would be $c_nx+c_{n-1}x..........................cx=0$
now I assumed a simple linear differential equation of second degree that
is 3y''+4y'-3y=0
there comes out be two roots
pf the equation
but they have represented these roots in the form of ce^x
IDK how ce^x comes from?
 
6:46 AM
indirectly saying i want to understand proof of all the identity given below in the link
 
7:11 AM
@JackRod: Do you understand that that function satisfies the differential equation?
The characteristic equation is $3x^2+4x-3=0$, which has solutions $\alpha=\frac{-2+\sqrt{13}}{3}$ and $\beta=\frac{-2-\sqrt{13}}{3}$
If we set $y=e^{\alpha x}$, then we get $y'=\alpha y$ and $y''=\alpha^2y$
$3y''+4y'-3y=\left(3\alpha^2+4\alpha-3\right)y=0$
If we set $y=e^{\beta x}$, then we get $y'=\beta y$ and $y''=\beta^2y$
$3y''+4y'-3y=\left(3\beta^2+4\beta-3\right)y=0$
 
yes?
sir why do we add the two roots like if i assume as above the solution of it will be
$y=c1e^{\alpha x}+c2e^{\beta x}$
 
If $3y_1''+4y_1'-3y_1=0$ and $3y_2''+4y_2'-3y_2=0$, what would $3(y_1+y_2)''+4(y_1+y_2)'-3(y_1+y_2)$ be?
 
7:29 AM
=$\left(3\beta^2+4\beta-3\right)y+\left(3\alpha^2+4\alpha-3\right)y$
 
however, I didn't say what $y_1$ or $y_2$ were. I just said they satisfied that equation.
 
yes sir
it is like ()r1+()r2?
where r1 and r2 are the roots?
 
$(y_1+y_2)'=y_1'+y_2'$ right?
 
yes
 
then $(y_1+y_2)''=y_1''+y_2''$ right?
 
7:32 AM
yess
 
If $3y_1''+4y_1'-3y_1=0$ and $3y_2''+4y_2'-3y_2=0$, what would $3(y_1+y_2)''+4(y_1+y_2)'-3(y_1+y_2)$ be?
 
3y1"+3y2"+4y1'+4y2'-3y1-3y2
and 3y"1+4y1'-3y1+3y"2+4y'2+-3y2=
@robjohn hi
 
and what does that equal?
 
y
that is a general solution
11 mins ago, by Jack Rod
it is like ()r1+()r2?
 
$3(y_1+y_2)''+4(y_1+y_2)'-3(y_1+y_2)=\left(3y_1''+4y_1'-3y_1\right)+\left(3y_2''+4y_2'-3y_2\right)=0+0=0$
 
7:43 AM
oh shit yes
they are roots
yes yes zero
 
so if you add any two solutions to that equation, you get another solution.
 
sir if roots are equal then?
 
if $3y''+4y'-3y=0$ what is $3(ay)''+4(ay)'-3(ay)$?
for a constant $a$
 
$(3(y)''+4(y)'-3(y))a$
 
and ?
 
7:47 AM
=0
 
yes
so if $y_1$ and $y_2$ are solutions, and $a_1$ and $a_2$ are constants, then $a_1y_1+a_2y_2$ is also a solution.
 
                                    ok sir
 
That is true of any homogeneous linear differential equation
 
sir like the question above roots are in complex form
37 mins ago, by robjohn
The characteristic equation is $3x^2+4x-3=0$, which has solutions $\alpha=\frac{-2+\sqrt{13}}{3}$ and $\beta=\frac{-2-\sqrt{13}}{3}$
in general if iassume $y1=e^{\alpha x}$
y=y1+y2?@robjohn
 
$a_1e^{\alpha x}+a_2e^{\beta x}$ satisfies $3y''+4y'-3y=0$
 
7:58 AM
sir if I did not add a1 and a2 then will it not be the solution?
 
@JackRod what, you mean set $a_1=a_2=1$?
 
yes
 
that would be a solution, but not all solutions.
 
24 secs ago, by robjohn
that would be a solution, but not all solutions.
sorry sir but what does it mean
 
$e^{\alpha x}+e^{\beta x}$ is a solution to the equation but so is $2e^{\alpha x}+e^{\beta x}$
$3e^{\alpha x}+5e^{\beta x}$ would be another solution
 
8:06 AM
one differential equation can satisfy many equations?
 
No. The differential equation is $3y''+4y'-3y=0$
$y=a_1e^{\alpha x}+a_2e^{\beta x}$ are the solutions for the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ we computed above.
 
ok sir I have one mre simple example if u can explain through that
 
$a_1$ and $a_2$ are chosen to satisfy initial conditions (or something similar)
 
like if $\frac {d^2 y}{dx}-y=0$
 
$\frac {d^2 y}{dx^2}-y=0$
 
8:14 AM
yes
 
what are the roots of $x^2-1=0$?
why?
 
57 secs ago, by robjohn
what are the roots of $x^2-1=0$?
=+-1
 
so the solutions would be of the form $y=a_1e^x+a_2e^{-x}$
 
what I was saying y" i assume to be y^2
y^2-y=0
 
I don't understand. $y''$ is not $y^2$. you will only confuse things if you write that.
 
8:18 AM
ok..?
 
@JackRod that has solutions $y=1$ and $y=0$, those are not related to the differential equation.
 
yes
that is what i got
 
Why are you converting $y''$ to $y^2$?
 
because my book usually proceed with it
 
Are you sure? it says to replace $y''$ with $y^2$?
that will in NO WAY lead to a solution
The characteristic equation for $y''-y=0$ is $x^2-1=0$
check that $e^x$ and $e^{-x}$ are both solutions to $y''-y=0$
 
8:23 AM
yes they are
 
that is because $+1$ and $-1$ are both roots of $x^2-1=0$
 
ok sir so how do i get characteristic equation from the differential equation like this you have given me the equation and I just plug it and got right
but in general when i for any linear differential equation of some order n
how do i proceed with first step?
 
The characteristic equation of the homogeneous linear differential equation $ay''+by'+cy=0$ is $ax^2+bx+c=0$
 
ok
 
the roots of that equation $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ will then lead to the solutions of the differential equation of the form $y=c_1e^{\alpha_1x}+c_2e^{\alpha_2x}$
 
8:27 AM
ok sir now i got it
 
it is pretty easy to see how to extend that to higher order equations, is it not?
 
yes
sir they are two three terms in the book which i need to understand
first is :linear independence
second is the wronskian
 
a set of vectors $\{v_k\}$ are linearly independent if $\sum_ka_kv_k=0$ means that $a_k=0$ for all $k$
that means you cannot write a linear combination that vanishes, unless the coefficients are all $0$
 
ok
sir
linear independence of a linear differential equation is all the constants are zero
if the sum of it to be zero
what about second?
 
no. independence is not something that is assigned to differential equation
 
8:35 AM
@robjohn
ok
 
a set of solutions can be linearly independent or not
the wronskian is a way of determining if a set of solutions are independent. Sometimes a set of independent solutions has a vanishing wronskian, but if the wronskian doesn't vanish, the solutions are independent.
 
ok?
 
In mathematics, the Wronskian (or Wrońskian) is a determinant introduced by Józef Hoene-Wroński (1812) and named by Thomas Muir (1882, Chapter XVIII). It is used in the study of differential equations, where it can sometimes show linear independence in a set of solutions. == Definition == The Wronskian of two differentiable functions f  and g is W(f, g) = f g′ – g f ′. More generally, for n real- or complex-valued functions f1, . . . , fn, which are n – 1 times differentiable on an interval I, the Wronskian W(f1, . . . , fn) as a function on I is defined by W (...
 
ok sir
let me have a read
@robjohn now I will practice some question and get back to u if get any trouble
 
ok
 
8:56 AM
@robjohn sir if a equation has four roots and all are equal
 
 
1 hour later…
10:18 AM
equal roots add a degree to a polynomial coefficient: $y''-2y'+y=0$ has solutions of $y=(a_1+a_2x)e^x$
 

« first day (403 days earlier)      last day (265 days later) »