« first day (3695 days earlier)      last day (1276 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

12:22 AM
@MarkWells It's definitely a core part of my personal Fate blend.
@MarkWells And, to be clear, 4e has all the same problems that all of D&D has which led me to walk away from it eight years ago and I probably won't ever look back at any version of the franchise or its imitators. But it's amusing/bemusing to see how much 5e seems to have refused to incorporate lessons from 4e.
 
yeah
 
@BESW I think some of that is just D&D not sharing your goals. For example, precise control over the pacing and challenge level of encounters is not something I care about. And on the other hand, having your character steadily growing in power on various numerical scales is not something you or I care about but the mainstream D&D community seems very interested in it.
 
I mean... I haven't said anywhere in the above conversation that the problems D&D has are inherently wrong, just that they're problems I have with it.
Elements like a focus on violence as a primary problem-solving tool, and linear/cumulative development, which are very much about a particular playstyle, aren't things I can criticize other people for enjoying (though a lot of the hate vs 4e is exactly that "not my playstyle so it's bad" attitude so I can see where people might think I'm indulging in the same).
On the other hand, I think an argument can be made that the franchise's dedication to other elements such as bioessentialism, exoticism, and looting of cultural sites, isn't just a problem of mismatched play goals.
I didn't mention those parts above though.
(And then there's the problems with Wizards of the Coast as a company, which I wasn't as aware of when I left D&D but are now absolutely a larger obstacle to my considering a return than anything in the game itself.)
 
12:39 AM
I think I've honestly finally lost any of the remaining want to ever go back to 4e
there are a lot of other games I can get the same thing I was getting out of it from
XD
I don't know exactly when this happened but thinking on it now it doesn't seem to register as anything I want anymore
I would still choose it over 5e though
if that was somehow the only choice I was given
 
Yeah, same? I totally remember that surge we got from tinkering with the system we'd mastered so well, but... eh, now.
I can't tell anybody else how to do their own mental calculus about interacting with Wizards, but it's pretty clear for me, and the only Wizards-related stuff I share now is the work done to make it a better space and empower marginalized people within it.
 
1:09 AM
So yeah, 4e did a lot of cool work to show me how I could give my players epic battles in which they were vastly outnumbered but still emerged heroic, because that's the kind of story we were telling.
And now, thanks in large part to the schema it built for me, I have the confidence to expand on those ideas in systems like Fate and Lady Blackbird.
eg, Fate's 'anything is a character' fractal approach to design
 
@BESW Thanks. That provides some insight, I think.
 
I'm glad!
It always felt a bit weird to me when D&D 3.5 went "yeah, your characters based on epic heroes like Conan, Legolas, and Fafnir? they should really just run away when they're significantly outnumbered." The mechanics don't fit the narratives the game is clearly referencing, and "balance" isn't a reason: balance is the game making a statement about the kind of story it's telling, not the other way around.
In comparison, 4e was a lightning bolt from the heavens because it uncoupled power-level mechanics from the diegesis.
That unlocked my brain so that I could explore other ways to interface rules, mechanics, narrative, diegesis, and table-level needs and policies.
And it makes me sad/amused that 5e has walked back on so many of the really cool problem-solving tools 4e incorporated.
Not because I had any interest in playing 5e, but because it's the giant in the room and so many people are using it to define their understandstanding of what TRPGs are capable of.
(Naturally I'd rather if there weren't any single game or franchise that dominated the hobby like D&D does, but that's not a reasonable short-term goal.)
 
1:30 AM
yeah I hope at some point people realize there are a looooot of other Tabletop RPG options available for them to try out
 
As someone who actually likes D&D, I agree that its dominance is unhealthy for the larger scene, and probably for itself. 5e is annoyingly risk-averse, probably inevitably, given Wizards' market position.
 
Yeah, it's understandable but no less annoying. And it's still nothing compared to the stuff Wizards gets up to as an employer.
Oct 30 at 5:45, by BESW
I mean, of all the problems with Wizards of the Coast, D&D is not my primary concern. Of all the problems with D&D, 5e's particular issues are not my primary concern. And of all 5e's particular issues, poorly edited copy-paste from previous editions is not my primary concern.
 
I mean, to be perfectly honest all those things are enough for me not to mess with the system,.... the other problems they have are bigger but I don't even need them to disengage with D&D XD
 
Aye. At the time, it was mostly the complexity, cost (in time and brain as well as money), and lack of support for narrative arcs or nuanced non-combat scenes, which led me to look for non-D&D options.
 
6
Q: Does the Halfling deity Brandobaris have any known offspring?

The GrumbleputtyI'm writing an adventure that features an Emyprean, who for story purposes would ideally be an offspring of Brandobaris. I'd like to know if there are any offspring of Brandobaris referenced in any of the Forgotten Realms lore. The answer need not be limited to 5th edition- if there are reference...

 
1:47 AM
A big draw for Fate in particular at the beginning was the combination of the fudge dice curve (small modifiers produce big effects, making character competence always more important than the randomness of the dice) and the fate point system (magically creating a flow of crisis/victory or drama/catharsis across the course of a single session, or even a single scene).
Compare D&D, where the d20 reflects character competency over time rather than per roll; and the main scene/session pacing mechanism is nested races of attrition for diegetic resources.
 
@HotRPGQuestions umm. This brings up so many more questions, starting with “can we change this?”
 
2:04 AM
@BardicWizard what do you mean?
 
@ThomasMarkov can we send someone to sleep with this deity and make sure the answer is yes
 
Oh. Sure.
 
It was half a joke but not the good half
 
He’s already got a main squeeze.
 
2:45 AM
lol
 
3:43 AM
INVINCIBLE SWORD PRINCESS by Kazumi Chin. A game of postcolonial revenge. "Four years ago, at your mother’s funeral, you and your sisters made a pact. Together, you’d find her killers—and they would be met with justice."
 
1
Q: What is the lowest level character that can unfailingly beat the Lost Mine of Phandelver starting encounter?

Red OrcaFor a lot of players, Lost Mine of Phandelver from the D&D Starter Set was their first 5e adventure. The first encounter from that adventure is rather swingy, like many level 1 combats. PCs may end up victorious without a scratch, or unconscious without getting a turn. Terminally bad luck? Let's ...

 
Okay, so this quote from Murderbot is... A Mood.
> There’s unrealistic that takes you away from reality and unrealistic that reminds you that everybody’s afraid of you.
 
oof
 
@trogdor Yeah, it came across my twitter feed (I'm following a Murderbot quote bot) immediately after Bogi Takács started a thread about a particularly unpleasant not-own-voices subgenre of autism "literature" and just... [gestures disgustedly]
 
4:01 AM
@BESW plot twist: the phone call came from inside the house, so to speak
 
@BESW immediately wooshing
I'm* (but keeping the aforementioned typo)
 
4:30 AM
@BESW wow yeah yep
I read a book a couple months ago with what seemed to be supposed to an autistic protagonist and I just kept getting weird vibes from it I felt like it wasn't handled well, and the author refused to use the word "Autistic" except once when referring to children and it was all,... unsettling
and I never was able to find anything one way or the other if the author even was autistic
I just found the tweet I think you mean
oh yeah I just realized you also linked it XD
 
@AncientSwordRage Context is a human/machine construct talking with an artificial intelligence about TV shows that depict human/machine constructs.
 
3
Q: Does the Greater Restoration spell grant knowledge about the effect it ends?

CatilaneI have a really great hunch that my players will cast greater restoration on a person charmed by Levistus. Is there any consensus or RAW that states that the caster will learn anything about what is cured?

 
Murderbot watches unrealistic TV shows because they are escapist fantasties, but avoids shows which depict beings like itself because that kind of unrealistic isn't escapist.
> “There aren’t that many shows with SecUnits, and they’re either villains or the villain’s minions.” The only SecUnits in entertainment media were rogues, out to kill all humans because they forgot who built the repair cubicles, I guess.
Compare Bogi's thread on books which follow the general outline "Sibling of autistic kid comes to terms with having an extremely annoying autistic sibling."
Both are talking about someone watching stories with unrealistic depictions of something about their identity, which is unrealistic in specific ways that reflect peoples' fear of them.
(It's a particularly cogent comparison because while Murderbot is not autistic, their particular way of interacting with the world has a lot of access intimacy overlap with autism.)
But both insights are generalizable to the pain of watching other kinds of media portrayal that reinforce fearful stereotypes about oneself.
Have I mentioned recently that Martha Wells' "Murderbot" series is amazing and everyone should read it? It's hilarious and adorable and oh my heart.
 
user15026
4:57 AM
@BESW saaaaaame, I love Murderbot so much.
 
@BESW yes, one of the reasons I like it so much is that Murderbot has sometimes a relatively similar view of humans as I do
it's not 1/1 but Murderbot doesn't like eye contact, doesn't want to talk to other people sometimes when it isn't in the mood for it, and yet will still risk it's life to save the humans who aren't just giant walking butts
(for that last one I'm not as brave in the life risking department but still)
murderbot also doesn't particularly like physical contact
and drowns itself in media a lot for escapism
I could go on XD
the point is, yes you are very right about that access intimacy overlap
also, that link is horrific, as an Autistic person with two siblings it made me wonder if they thought of me that way, like the only reason I existed was to make their lives worse :/
thanks book
go die in a fire now
 
5:29 AM
9
Q: If I have a single diamond worth more than 300 gp, does Revivify consume the whole diamond?

Alex MeuerThanks to a heist of mixed success, I have in my possession a single diamond worth roughly 550 gold pieces. If I use this diamond to cast Revivify, will casting the spell consume the whole diamond? I know that I could also use the diamond to cast Raise Dead, but that comes with drawbacks and is a...

 
@HotRPGQuestions you want a diamond that revive magic has chewed on, left all jagged, and covered in saliva?
 
Now I have this image of a diamond that's still the same shape, but it's had nearly half its mass removed randomly from all through its structure so it's like, diamond foam.
 
it might not be the same shape either is part of what I'm saying
there could be an uneven chunk out of it XD
 
 
2 hours later…
7:14 AM
Booming blade and green flame blade are now a range of self.
 
@ThomasMarkov Thankfully, I own a physical copy of the book, so I can continue to pretend they didn't make that change. 🙃
 
 
2 hours later…
9:12 AM
@BESW click got it
@ThomasMarkov as they say on the internet "thanks, I hate it"
> Also, in the last sentence, “if the creature is moved more than 30 feet” has been changed to “if the creature is more than 30 feet.”
It only effects the Luggage?
Did they miss a word?
Also a bunch of others are now self as well
 
9:45 AM
@AncientSwordRage Also the tarrasque, it's more than 30 feet (long).
 
aw dang I was hopping it was entirely made of more than 30 feet
my dreams of a giant monster made of more than 30 feet dashed once again
 
("Wheel of Feet," Curt Frankenstein.)
 
XD
ok maybe I just shouldn't dream :P
2
but wait, that isn't enough feet, maybe more feet? (please no more feet)
 
The multibear has 16 feet, that's a solid start.
32 limb extremities, if you want to fudge on the feet requirement.
 
10:07 AM
XD
I forgot
 
@BESW I really have to watch GF
 
the multibear
 
@AncientSwordRage Oh, not that multibear.
 
the multibear is fantastic
the Wizardry 8 multibear
although I guess it is named after the GF multibear
 
10:10 AM
Yup, that one. You're supposedly playing a party of six to eight individuals, but mechanically in terms of interacting with the game world it treats you like a single gestalt being with heads and weapon-brandishing arms emerging erratically from a seething mass of flesh.
 
yes that's the one
also, to make it weirder
you can play as up to 8 people because people can voluntarily join this mass of bodies
XD
you can have 6 party members who start as members of the multibear and there are multiple people you can talk to who can join, and you can have any two of them (excepting two that you have to have together) at any given time once you have found them
and then they can also be expelled from the multibear as well
it's an incredibly hilarous meta way to think of the game
 
@trogdor instant thought (Spoiler warning for the 1982 film The Thing; also content warning for body and absorption horror)
 
(Aside: Gravity Falls is generally a pretty good show, it's clever and funny; but I think a warning needs to be given for its gender/race rep, including a recurring character who is... a transphobic joke, no two ways around it.)
 
:(
 
why they gotta do that
 
10:14 AM
:( :(
 
@AncientSwordRage Spoiler warning for the 1982 film The Thing; also content warning for body and absorption horror.
 
@BESW good point
 
It's a fun little story though!
 
thanks ( I steal )
 
yeah I read that once already and I don't want to do that again XD
 
10:20 AM
oh no, sorry, I am a little blind to some stuff that I really shouldn't be
 
nah that's not a problem
 
thats ok then
 
once I clicked on it and read a little I knew what it was and stopped
XD
 
@AncientSwordRage You accidentally the last word.
 
10:24 AM
"body and absorption horror"
I'm not sure "body" needs a content warning.
 
@BESW ahh I thought you were correcting my ' I Steal ' grammar XD
 
Ah.
 
yeah body absorbtion is,... adjacent to one or possibly two of the things that creeps me out the most
 
Also it occurs to me that some people may not be familiar with the "i accidentally" meme.
 
@BESW It's a good one
@trogdor I had never actually considered that part of the movie ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
10:28 AM
believe you me, I did
XD
 
Yeah, and the short story puts it front and center.
 
It does
it really does
 
yeah
 
@BESW I always thought it was "I accidentally a word" implying they missed a word but also missed the word missed in saying they missed a word
 
My first exposure to it was a yahoo questions post asking "i accidentally a whole bottle of coke, what should I do?"
 
10:33 AM
mine has only been via reddit edit messages
 
I think my only exposure to it has been people saying it
like you both saying it here for example
XD
 
....I listened to LOOK MUM NO COMPUTER's "Modern Gas" (content warning reassembled doll parts) at least three times before I noticed that the chorus is "modern gas," not "modern gods," and now I don't think I understand it anymore. Also I feel silly because it's the title of the song.
 
the mondegreen is strong with this one
 
Maybe it's a reference to Classical Gas?
 
10:43 AM
I once listened to 'Zombie Nation', and I thought the lyrics were "Don't make baby chuck"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
@kviiri [googles] That seems like the kind of thing LMNC might reference?
 
My favorite Mondegreens in English are the widely-popular "There's a bathroom on the right" and "'Scuse me while I kiss this guy"
 
@AncientSwordRage I mean, I started out thinking it was "more than gods," so...
 
@BESW at least that scans
 
Mar 19 '16 at 23:45, by BESW
From a Facebook chat: "Spoonerise, Malaprop, and Mondegreen" would be another good name for a band.
 
10:46 AM
In Finnish, there's a song which goes roughly "Do you truly want me in a serious relationship?" and I heard it for years as meaning "Do you truly want me to share your bathroom?" I think it helps that my version made a lot of sense too.
 
Yeah! "modern gods" and "more than gods" are more obviously relephant to the theme of "Modern Gas."
 
Clever use of words there indeed
 
The stanzas are about belief, after all.
(Been listening to LMNC a lot lately...)
 
@kviiri I'm trying to find the parody I once heard of that some, about werewolves
 
 
10:56 AM
this is better than anything I could find
 
 
2 hours later…
12:54 PM
@BESW possibly an angel, definitely the absolute worst one
 
1:25 PM
I was making an image in response but my computer crashed.
 
The changes to booming blade affected the counterspell question.
 
If I wanted locks to be used on Meta policy questions after consensus was reached, would I start by opening a Meta on whether people actually want that?
@ThomasMarkov They do?
 
I'm not sure that's how "policies" work here.
 
@Medix2 "as part of the action used to cast this spell" was changed.
 
@BESW Yeah... Same XD
 
1:31 PM
> You brandish the weapon used in the spell’s casting and make a
melee attack with it against one creature within 5 feet of you.
 
@ThomasMarkov Oh and gosh darn it now the 5 feet is right in there so lunging attack and distant spell won't work (like counterspell)
Oh and standing from prone got answered
Oh wow, and the lightning lure and sword burst questions can get updated
 
y'all got a link to this errata <scratches face>?
 
6 hours ago, by Thomas Markov
https://media.wizards.com/2020/dnd/downloads/SCAG-Errata.pdf
 
@ThomasMarkov I can't find anything about prosthetic limbs in that errata
Do I need more coffee?
 
1:36 PM
I wonder if I should bounty like... Twelve questions
 
@BESW hahahaha, that's perfect
@Medix2 note we don't even have an appropriate kind of lock for this: "policy lock" isn't designed to freeze the question in stone, it's just Stack Exchange staff not wanting public HR-approved company statements to get edited into things that are not what they intend. Voting and new answers are still allowed.
 
@doppelgreener Yup, so it'd be an edit lock or something :(
 
> In the Replicable Items
(2nd-Level Artificer) table, the armblade and the prosthetic limb
have been removed.
 
@ThomasMarkov What does "Extra Attack (p. 142). The following text has been added after the first sentence: “Moreover, you can cast one of your cantrips in place of one of those attacks.”" mean?
 
1:45 PM
you'd have to request an altogether new lock type if you want consensus to be unable to change, but our system isn't defined on a "sentiment is not allowed to change policy" basis—in fact we are very much able to change policy as sentiment or circumstances chnage
 
@ThomasMarkov Yes, to the bladesinger
 
@Medix2 It used to say: "Starting at 6th level, you can attack twice, instead of once, whenever you take the Attack action on your turn." Now it has that extra sentence allowign you to cast one cantrip in place of one of the attacks.
 
@ThomasMarkov I'm not reading no attunement. I'm reading you can't make one with replicate item.
 
@ThomasMarkov But just any cantrip? Any Extra Attack?
Oh! Got it
 
> This item’s attunement requirement
has been removed, and both paragraphs of the item’s description
have been replaced with the following text: “This item replaces
a lost limb—a hand, an arm, a foot, a leg, or a similar body part.
While the prosthetic is attached, it functions identically to the
part it replaces. You can detach or reattach it as an action, and it
can’t be removed against your will. It detaches if you die.”
 
1:48 PM
@ThomasMarkov Does that make the Elf wizard with sword subclass worthwhile (it obviously makes it better)?
 
@doppelgreener Which... Yeah, is a whole kerfuffle in and of itself because there are downsides to revisiting constantly (whatever that means) and to not revisiting :(
 
well i'll note there are tons of policies we've revisited multiple times in our site's history that you haven't heard about because that went just fine
or you have but were unremarkable
like the multiple times we revised our understanding of how to handle designer reasoning questions
there was a kerfuffle around game recs, but that wasn't even the revisits themselves so much as how the moderator team was interacting with the community and some actions that strained trust
 
@NautArch Yea.
hmmmm a bladesinger could make use of true strike.
ooooooh eldritch blast + an attack
I think the bladesinger just got good.
wait, true strike is still terrible.
 
@ThomasMarkov Yup
@ThomasMarkov That would require Multiclassing or a feat, right?
 
Yeah. Magic Initiate could get it.
 
2:03 PM
But why that over the wizard cantrips? Just the damage types?
 
OOh maybe if the warlock-lite feat is in Tasha's.
There was one that let you take one invocation.
 
2:16 PM
@Someone_Evil Damage type and range and variability with target choices and also just total damage I imagine
Also why'd you close my question when sword burst is now fundamentally different (range self so Distant Spell no longer applies at all)
 
Wait, what?
 
2
Q: Dex Save Vs Enemy Attack Roll

DynobombMy party and I were battling a group of orcs and my character turns invisible but doesn't move. The orc I was facing starts randomly swinging his blades in my general direction. I was in range but my DM made me roll a dex save rather than have the orc make an attack roll. Is this the correct call...

 
@Someone_Evil Sword burst has a range of self now.
 
Oh, yeah. Is that why the new question got asked?
 
> This spell’s range has been
changed to “Self (5-foot radius)”. Additionally, the second sentence now reads “All other creatures within 5 feet of you must
succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d6 force damage.”
 
2:20 PM
(If that was why, including such a note - possibly just as a comment - might be beneficial)
 
mmmm got a question
Does distant spell metamagic increase the range of AoE spells with a range of self?
(like sword burst)
do we have a question on that?
 
9
Q: Metamagic Distant Spell and AoE spells

ManuelThe Distant Spell Metamagic option gives you the ability to double the Range of a spell, or give a spell with range of Touch a range of 30ft. If I would apply this to, let's say, burning hands, which states as Range Self (15ft cone), would this increase the cone size to 30ft or would this cast t...

(does need a better title really, if anyone can come up with one)
 
lil take a stab at it
 
@ThomasMarkov I was debating asking that. But I think the answer is no but also "Self (SHAPE)" isn't particularly well defined anywhere
 
@Medix2 See question Someone_evil shared
 
2:26 PM
Oh we do just have a question. And I literally read that like seven minutes ago and completely ignored that it was asking about that
 
but the only citation is a tweet groan
 
No? The citation is English
> Burning hands has a range of Self. Self is not a number that is 5 feet or greater, therefore you cannot apply Distant Spell to it.
 
@Medix2 Yeah, an English tweet.
 
No I think that's just interpreting the rules?
It has range Self, that's indisputable. Therefore the range is not 5+ feet, therefore it cannot be Distantified
 
Self (15 feet o) has a number of 5 or greater in it.
 
2:29 PM
@ThomasMarkov Yeah, I just think they're ignoring / not fully addressing the parenthetical
 
why doesnt it become Self (30 feet)?
maybe a bounty is in order :P
or we can discuss it with @Rubiksmoose
 
I left a comment XD
 
2:56 PM
@ThomasMarkov grazie! I didn't look at next in my search :P
 
3:10 PM
The purple dragon knight received a nerf. whyyyyyy
 
To make it abundantly clear you shouldn't play it?
 
Yes.
Possibly a major lore change with this errata
This sentence has been deleted from SCAG:
> The truly false and faithless are mortared into the Wall of the Faithless, the great barrier that bounds the City of the Dead, where their souls slowly dissolve and begin to become part of the stuff of the Wall itself.
 
Though, to be fair, it is actually a correction to the general pattern for fighter subclasses (to gain a feature/benefit at 18th level and not 17th)
 
@Someone_Evil I know. But still.
The afterlife of the Forgotten Realms just got a little bit less grim for atheists.
 
Pretty sure there are worse eternities in that cosmology than dissolving into infrastructure, but I guess
 
3:20 PM
All in all they're just another brick soul in the wall
2
So they errata'd out lore? Does that mean the lore isn't canon anymore, or are they saying that the souls are used for some other infrastructure, like cobblestones or traffic signs?
 
@ThomasMarkov I recall that section from skimming FR wikies, but I don't think I caught one detail at the time: were the souls meant to stay conscious throughout the process or not?
 
3:46 PM
Imma just keep ignoring what they put out :P
Can you be a 5e grognard? Because I think I am.
2
 
4:04 PM
@NautArch Welcome to the club.
 
@MarkWells Are there hats?
 
@NautArch Depends. Are you French? Did you serve in the military during the 5e era? Are you receiving a pension for your service?
 
@vicky_molokh-unsilenceMonica I would prefer not to disclose that.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:28 PM
@ThomasMarkov oh boy! I have so many answers that need updating because of the new SAC. I think you all commented on them all :)
FWIW, I don't object to people editing that kind of thing into my answer. That is what the edit is there for after all, but I understand why people might not want to.
 
5:40 PM
@NautArch If you create a character that has no levels of bard or warlock... you might be a grognard!
 
5:51 PM
New headcannon: WotC releases errata to keep us busy
 
if so, this just makes my position of "no, I paid my fifty bucks and now this book belongs to me" more reasonable
 
@NautArch Think of it this way: a grognard is nearly a backwards dragon (well, technically it’s a backwards drangorg, but it’s got most of the same letters in close to the same order)
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (34): Does forced movement trigger the effects of the Prismatic Wall spell? ✏️ by Emir on rpg.SE (@Rubiksmoose)
 
Why is smokedetector just picking that up now?
That answer is 3 weeks old.
 
New answer on the same question, which I guess makes it check again?
 
6:03 PM
@Someone_Evil If the question about the implications of the booming blade errata doesnt get closed, can we exempt it from HNQ?
 
@ThomasMarkov I'm still on the fence about my VTC.
On one hand, it'd be nice to aggregate this, but it also seems super broad.
 
@NautArch Yeah, I thought about it.
 
@Someone_Evil Yup! any new activity makes it rescan.
Unless you tell smokey not to. Which I will now do so.
 
@ThomasMarkov I guess we'll see where the votes come in
 
Im not VTCing, but if it closes, Im not VTRing either.
 
6:18 PM
@ThomasMarkov not a bad fence riding
I guess I could try and find the questions that are already on the stack dealing with those things and maybe we can remove those from the list? I dunno.
 
@SmokeDetector false positive
@MarkWells you don't?
@NautArch but its just about one change to one spell...
linking in other questions would be good
 
Two spells
@AncientSwordRage I can make an index in my answer
 
laughs in count from Sesame Street
 
Or you can, its community wiki
 
I could do many things
 
6:24 PM
Under each section, add "Affected Q&As:"
I'll add that to my list of things to do.
 
@AncientSwordRage Right, but it's that change across a lot of different interactions.
It's a big list, and i'm not even sure of the bounds.
Feats, abilities, UA, etc?
 
UA can pound sand.
 
Or just a "See: ... for more details"
 
BUt that's why i'm on the fence. It's one question, but when you look carefully it's all about specific multiple interactions - and we usually ask those separately.
And if we already have existing questions about those interactions, then we've got some duplicate issues.
 
We have asked those separately
Most of them, at least.
 
6:26 PM
If we ask those pieces separately, we should answer them separately.
 
I feel dumb now.
 
but again, it's a single big change to two spells that WoTC made and understanding the total ramifications seems important.
why?
 
We have other questions of the type "What are the ramification of this change", though usually it's a proposed houserule and not WotC's declared houserule (which is one way to look at errata), no?
 
I voted to close the question and then totally forgot I had
 
Ha!
 
6:28 PM
I think it should be closed. It's asking about lots of interactions, which if asked individually, most would be closed as dupes of questions that are being or have been updated already.
 
@Someone_Evil What do you think? ^^
@ThomasMarkov add that as a comment
 
@NautArch Good idea.
 
> A note about D&D spells with a range of "Self (XYZ)": the parenthetical—which says "5-foot radius," "15-foot cone," or something else—means you are the spell's point of origin, but you aren't necessarily its target. You're creating an effect that originates in your space. #DnD
 
Miss me with that nonsense
(thats a slight at JC, not you @AncientSwordRage)
 
6:44 PM
Is it wrong I assumed as much?
 
Id hope you would assume first I wasnt trying to slight you
But I realized the comment may have sounded bad if misunderstood
 
FWIW, with the new wording of the spells, I now agree that Counterspell stops the associated melee attack.
 
Is it weird that the answer to this question only answers the issue regarding dual wielding lances when that's already a Q&A and doesn't seem to add anything else?
or am i missing something?
 
@ThomasMarkov we good
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (3695 days earlier)      last day (1276 days later) »