I just dumped my solution to the Warcaster/Resilient debate.

Spoiler Warning: it involves math.

What?! Math, in a ttrpg?!

Unheard of!

I know, right?!

TL;DR: Warcaster is better for really hard hits and lower levels, Resilient is better for weak hits and higher levels.

But those two things don't tend to correlate.

Higher levels == harder enemies == higher damage per hit

@Xirema I dunno, I feel like I encounter more gelatinous cubes later in a campaign than early.

(Ignore the fact that they're CR 2)

Also, turns out I need to fix my math, because I forgot Concentration uses half the damage, not the total damage.

(which also means we need to retcon our D&D session from two nights ago...)

@MikeQ Warcraft II And FWIW, Poul Anderson's Three Hearts Three Lions book had a dwarf with a scots type accent, though it was more olde/middle English than scots.

@NautArch What, nobody else hoards gold and gems?

@Xirema And floors it at 10, just for a little more complexity =)