« first day (2438 days earlier)      last day (2529 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@Adam Just be aware: the principle at play is (IMO) an important one: the Stack's mission isn't to answer the querent's question, it's to farm querents and answerers to create a repository of Q&A for readers.
See also:
267
Q: We're working on a new stat to help convey the reach of your posts here

JaydlesWe've got a new statistic on the shiny new Profile Page Prototype. It's not perfect yet. And we did a pretty crap job of explaining what it's all about! Let's talk. What you do here isn't just about solving one person's problem. A while back, a user contacted us about his friend's account. His...

 
12:17 AM
@Fado Hi! You'll need 20+ rep to type in chat, but you're welcome to hang out until then. Also, you may be looking for a travel.se chat room.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:30 AM
hey there @Chemus
 
Heya @Shalvenay, how's it goin?
 
alright here, as for you?
 
Just poppin' in...to lurk moar.
 
@Chemus This.
hey there @Shalvenay
 
hey there @Papayaman1000, how're things going?
 
1:41 AM
[shuffle shuffle lurk lurk]
 
Okay. The nieces are rambunctious. My son is helping me with them, though, so it's not too bad.
 
Quick GM improv: what's that ^^ a euphemism for? ("The nieces are rambunctions.")
 
@nitsua60 btw, you are correct that decreasing ambient pressure increases the vapor pressure (for a flammable liquid, decreases the flashpoint)
 
@nitsua60 It's the Rogue, trying to get a sneak attack in on the Wizard to take his valuable magic items.
wait
oh
oh god please no
 
Excuse me...
 
1:42 AM
@NathanielDavidson You're excused.
 
Thanks exactly is... Tabletop rpg
 
@NathanielDavidson Hi! Welcome =)
 
What
What exactly sorry
 
@Papayaman1000 [dopeslap] =D
 
Well, ever hear of Dungeons and Dragons?
 
1:43 AM
Sure
 
That's the most-known, though not entirely-representative, example.
 
Hmm... Ok maybe i just HEARD of the game... What platform is it on
 
@NathanielDavidson <tires screech> Not computers or consoles.
 
I'm just picturing in my head a chessboard
Ohhh
So... On a board?
 
People, often sitting around a table, maybe books and papers, maybe miniature figures, maybe all of this is online-mediated.
[rummages for pictures]
Did you watch Stranger Things?
 
1:46 AM
Hmm, interesting
No
 
A tabletop role-playing game (or pen-and-paper role-playing game) is a form of role-playing game (RPG) in which the participants describe their characters' actions through speech. Participants determine the actions of their characters based on their characterization, and the actions succeed or fail according to a formal system of rules and guidelines. Within the rules, players have the freedom to improvise; their choices shape the direction and outcome of the game. Unlike other types of role-playing game, tabletop RPGs are often conducted like radio drama: only the spoken component of a role is...
That photo there, while pandering to all the stereotypes, isn't exactly off the mark for some large portion of play.
 
Thanks
One question before I dive into the wiki
 
But I've participated in everything from a game with one die and an index card while driving my kids (we call that game "Little Adventures") to a game played on a "set" build spanning multiple tables.
 
Is there a pre-dinner plot?
Defined
Or it's rules of play is entirely up to the players
 
@NathanielDavidson Nope. Collaboratively explored/invented plot, though how exactly that happens will vary a lot from game to game and group to group.
 
1:49 AM
Cool... Hey thanks guys for bearing with me lol I know this was... Random.
 
@NathanielDavidson No worries! This is literally exactly what this room's for =)
[calls after him...] *we're so Random we've even got dice in this room..."
d20
 
[fails to make himself heard by departing visitor]
 
2:14 AM
@Papayaman1000 -- have you tried running a politically focused game before?
 
@Shalvenay A few.
 
@Papayaman1000 ah. perhaps we can hop off to the NAB for a bit and talk about approaches to IG politics then?
 
@Shalvenay Sure!
 
Lol now I know why nitsua hit the brakes so hard ^
Thanks for the wiki
 
2:32 AM
@NathanielDavidson -- would it help if you saw some chatlogs from play?
 
@NathanielDavidson No worries. Just know that that wiki article tries to not be very-much focused on D&D, but it desribes "typical games" as very much like D&D. There are many thousands of RPGs, covering almost everything you could think of.
But not everything--there's still room for you to write your own =)
 
yeah -- there really is no "typical" RPG although there are several major clusters games tend to group around
 
2:59 AM
Howdy @Shalvenay
 
how're things going?
 
Looking like the bright side of life
Any dungeon tonight?
 
we'll see if daze turns up
 
Sounds gouda
 
3:41 AM
@NautArch what a cheezy pun
 
 
11 hours later…
2:27 PM
@JoelHarmon @Zachiel this is the sort of thing I was thinking of when I made this comment:
May 29 at 23:37, by nitsua60
Hey Stackizens: I and other mods have noticed (though I don't have numbers for--this is purely a gut-feeling thing) an uptick in community moderation in the last month or so: closures with comments, welcoming comments, proactive+helpful edits, flags, pointers to metas, participation in metas I think this is great! It's wonderful to see even more users stepping forward and helping make this "a healthy community full of knowledgable, considerate people."
Thanks for the informative and welcoming comments!
 
You're welcome.
I usually feel like I have too many exclamation points in there, but I'm not sure how else to convey the tone.
 
I used to reflexively avoid all exclamation marks, as I believe them to be utterly banal in writing prose. But through the stack--and particularly, through welcome messages--I've come to appreciate that they really do convey a tone in an internet-comment that's both useful and cheery. (I still avoid them like the plague in meatspace writing.)
Or should that have been "I still avoid them like the plague in meatspace writing!"
=D
 
The irony!
 
Oh, my! Indeed!
Alright--gotta run. Happy gaming!
 
I treat exclamation marks as if they'll be read like I'm yelling unless there's a clear case for interpreting them as enthusiasm.
 
2:37 PM
@doppelgreener Why?!
 
@JoelHarmon I find that tends to work most reliably. People might have anxiety, or be conditioned to think people will be mean to them more often than genuinely enthusiastic, or expect people to be mean on the internet until proven otherwise, etc.
So sometimes I get a response as if I was yelling -- not necessarily on here, but on other mediums where people will provide that kind of feedback like a chat.
So I try to make it abundantly clear when I'm just being excited! :D
 
@doppelgreener Sorry, tone over the internet. I was attempting to be mildly amusing; perhaps I should have used more exclamation points!!!!!
 
Yes you should have!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Though the genuine enthusiasm thing is why I typically use it in "Welcome!" and "Happy gaming!" in the newbie comments, and actual enthusiasm in long form text.
 
3:07 PM
@doppelgreener I never noticed that second one, but WOW does it explain a lot.
 
hey there @Papayaman1000
 
Oh and nice new profile pic, doppelBLUEer
@Shalvenay hey there
 
how're things going?
 
Okay. Nieces stil. Cousin is graduating today. THat'll wrap me up for most of the day.
 
guess we'll see who's around tonight then
 
3:09 PM
I'll be back around 9-ish EST
in 10 hrs, in other words
hey there @Zachiel
 
hey there @Zachiel
 
long time no see
 
@doppelgreener I was more joking about the contents of your profile pic
 
ohhh ;D
 
3:13 PM
Though it does have that nice double-meaning, and the timing is just... impeccable
 
well I did become a diamond :D
 
"Doppelgreener's blue now!"
"Wait, in what regard?"
"Yes"
@doppelgreener I... you... I hate you.
 
You're welcome! I don't think it's something new by me, but if nobody beats me to it and I'm in the right mood I like trying to get in the head of people and saying "Hey, here's a thing they might not have realized, let's help."
Admittedly, I'm usually more brash and I often come off as judgemental, but I know that I'm speaking to people who don't know me and I sometimes manage to remember to avoid the "you're wrong, do this instead!" tone. ;)
 
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡– ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
*leaps at doppelgrener, brandishing a knife*
"WHO REALLY KILLED THE PINK MOD"
 
3:17 PM
Pink Mood?
 
[in reality papayaman is more just flailing around at ankle height]
 
(Hello @Papayaman1000 and @Shalvenay)
 
how're things going?
 
@doppelgreener ok now how could I possibly one-up that
 
3:19 PM
[KPOOF]
 
Ok, now. What's with the pointy noses.

Seriously. Opal. Urubosa.

Artists. Stop drawing pointy noses, they're unsexy. (:p)
 
The worst parts of the SU fandom would all heavily disagree
to a disturbing extent
like guys
eww
 
[draws more pointy noises than ever in response]
 
'>'
U
YOU HAVE BEEN BOONDOGGLED
( ͡° ͜> ͡°)
 
@Papayaman1000 it's a crow! A cute crow.
* > *
:^
 
4:14 PM
So, apart from BESW, Trogdor and the Vanished Eagle (I hope Wax is OK), who's proficient in D&D 4e here?
 
[crickets]
 
@Zachiel been a while...
 
@Magician Hey! Sup Magician?
 
Was about to go to sleep
But then I felt something drawing me, across the vast gulf of space
I used to be proficient in 4e, did you need help with something?
 
I've played D&D 4e from level 1 to level 16 and I've never needed to really reason about enemy team composition because I've always used predone encounters. So now, apart from expecting some sinergy from monsters in the same general block (among fire giants, or among fire elementals in this case), I'm realizing I don't know jack about setting up an interesting encounter.
Especially not about setting up an encounter that builds on the strenghts and weaknesses of the party.
 
4:25 PM
I believe DMG covers the basics fairly well: don't make every monster the same type, especially if it's soldier - those guys just tank. Mix it up.
Do you know what the party's capable of? Not just their classes, but their favorite tricks? Then you can cater to those. Trying to guess what they can do doesn't really work.
 
Ok, that I get. I know the theme of these 1-3 encounters is gonna be fire (a mage made a ritual to become a powerful elemental while PCs were busy solving a different invasion of the same city) and he's gonna be the artillery in the last encounter.
 
Fire, great. Do PCs know this? Potions of fire resistance are a thing. They can either make encounters trivial... or be required to survive.
 
Two in the party are tieflings, a fire mage that I think ignores fire resistances (or was it from next level?) and an elementalist who has a radiant and a thunder power too. The fighter can't be flanked, can shake off stunned and dazed conditions, the leader has a lance that removes AC save ends and can dish out tempo HP pretty easily. Then we have a frostcheese ranger archer.
Tieflings are resistant to fire
the fighter also has some resistance (3 I think)
The PCs suspect nothing. They gave him the chance to perform a purification ritual to purge undead and they had no idea that would have been by burning the whole city down.
 
Be vary of those resistances - check if any enemies become useless. Can easily happen if their main damage comes from ongoing fire.
A thing that took me a while to realise: in 4e, it being combat-as-sport and whatnot, combat outcome is predetermined: PCs will win See this ancient post for details‌​. So I tried to have at least some of my encounters have other outcomes as well. As in, how much of the city burns down.
For instance, maybe the pyromancer's fire cleansing ritual is still in progress when the PCs get there. There's a circle surrounded by braziers. Fire elementals fly out of them every round at great speed, heading into the city. PCs can knock down these braziers with a minor action, which instead spawns a fire elemental in front of them. Say there's 3 braziers, and 15 elementals total waiting to fly out.
All you need is a chart: 15 elementals made it to the city - completely burned down. 10-14 - a few sturdy buildings left, survivors huddled within. 5-9 - half the city still stands, will take a while to put the fires out. 1-4 - lots of smoke, fine otherwise.
Just as an example of combat affecting outside world.
Encounter building itself is sturdy enough, you don't need to worry too much about it. Oh, use MM3 monsters or updated monster math, especially if the party is paragon or higher. Without it, enemies are barely ever threatening.
Well, I hope that was useful, or at least coherent.
 
4:58 PM
@Magician I'm using MM3 and MV
 
Cool, that's one potential problem avoided.
 
Combat as sport is killing me. The fighter is looking for a character change after his current character dies and I'm not able to satisfy him. XD
Maybe I shouldn't, the party does not need a fourth striker.
 
5:35 PM
hey there @NautArch
 
Howdy @Shalvenay
 
what's up?
 
Enjoying a lovely 5 year old tantrum... You?
FYI, I am the worst dad and a big bad bully
 
OK here I suppose. what's your availability look like tonight btw?
 
6:33 PM
Not really sure, maybe around 11 eastern for an hour or so
 
7:19 PM
hey again @Papayaman1000
 
Oh, just here for a moment. On the way out. The tab was just open. Later.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:01 PM
@Magician (hears the call of a distant twin)
 
9:24 PM
@doppelgreener That was the best moment in that show.
@Zachiel I kind of wish there was a game that supported combat as sport & combat as war equally well (and supported them fully, not in a wishy-washy way)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:46 PM
hey there @nitsua60
 

« first day (2438 days earlier)      last day (2529 days later) »