« first day (2467 days earlier)      last day (1684 days later) » 

05:48
@Stephie That's hilarious!
@JourneymanGeek He does indeed get away with too much!
 
7 hours later…
12:53
An hour ago on our Pets website an answer has been posted. For me it seemed to be helpful, but at the same time looked like it had the potential to be seen as link-only or as more appropriate for a comment rather than answer. I left my comment for the author, suggesting an improvement. But I've just noticed that this answer appeared in the low-quality queue - I didn't flag it, but the comment I left could give the false impression that I did and it makes me uncomfortable.
I can confirm that the author of said answer is responsive, high reputation user, and willing to improve her answers if requested, take my word for it. I think the one who flagged the answer after all was the background robot, but that's only my guess, I could recall having read that it automatically flags answers shorter than a said length or containing certain links.
How could I prove that I didn't flag the answer, or should I prove it at all? I also don't know whether users are notified in the event of their own answer entering the low-quality queue.
Now I see that said answer has just been converted to a comment, oh that was fast and I'm too slow. I'm still a bit disappointed because it could look like the comment I left was somewhat insincere, but it wasn't.
13:17
@lila no particular need to.
though, looking at the post/comment... and not looking deeper, are they dupes?
13:48
@JourneymanGeek Ok thanks.
@lila and it looks like OP agrees
@JourneymanGeek They are duplicates yes.

« first day (2467 days earlier)      last day (1684 days later) »