« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (111 days later) » 

05:49
Some discussions of duplicates can be found if you search for duplicates, duplicate or "tagged/duplicate in CRUDE/CURED.
I am not sure how many of those can be clasified as frequent duplicates (or annoying duplicates).
06:10
@XanderHenderson No actually it's for people who cannot even get an existing academic to endorse them for posting on arXiv.
@MartinSleziak Can you point to any specific paper on vixra by a professional mathematician? If not, I'm not sure why we should even entertain it when almost all of it is crankery.
@AlexanderGruber: Here's one.
Though the user eventually realized it was bad math.
06:30
@user21820 Right. arXiv is too elitist, because you need a single person to endorse you.
06:41
For better readability - the above link is to this: Why elements of the set can be Goldbach pairs for a given even number?
in CURED, yesterday, by KReiser
crank answer in a question dealing with FLT: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/3673315/21412
@user21820 Wasn't already the founder of vixra legitimate scientist?
Anyway, I have suggested vixra as one of the strings for blacklist. Whether or not there are some legitimate works there is not really that important for the purpose of this room. (Although it might be an interesting question.)
Maybe one day I'll become a professional mathematician. :-)
@MartinSleziak Unfortunately, I consider a lot of "scientists" to be cranks, but that's a subjective opinion. I want to talk about mathematicians because there is an objective criterion for crankery; namely they cannot write down valid proofs.
I'd hope that you would not put down me as crank. We'll se in which direction I will evolve. :-)
OTOH I don't have anything on vixra (yet).
Although I used the word "professional", that was merely intended to make it easier to verify (by checking the university website).
There are plenty of legitimate mathematicians who are not "professional".
=)
06:48
And probably plenty of professional mathematicians who aren't legitimate.
Hahaha... that one is a problem in some places, yes...
I would try to find whether I can find some papers on vixra from some known mathematician. But I am not sure whether it would be a good use of my time.
No please don't waste your time unless it's just for fun. But if you accidentally come across any such papers, I'd be interested to see them.
Because I feel that all those who want to publish their legitimate mathematics would try to find the most 'respectable' venue to do so, and hence vixra isn't even on their list to try.
The main trouble is that my internet connection has slowed down for some reason. :-(
Hahaha
06:52
The main trouble is that my internet connection has slowed down for some reason. :-(
There is this question on MO: Hard maths on viXra?.
Ah so someone has had the same thoughts, and a comment mentions one such work, though it's not a "paper". =D Alright I'd better not derail this chat-room just two days after @AlexanderGruber opened it.
vixra was mentioned recently in this MO question (but it was just sait that it is better to avoid): Note rejected from arXiv: what to do next?
I don't think it is that much of a digression.
The comment mentioned above is:
vixra.org/pdf/1208.0223v1.pdf is a set of lecture notes on combinatorics by de Bruijn taken by Nienhuys. I don't know if the scribes have tried taking it to the arXiv, but I wouldn't be surprised if it got rejected due to the scribes not being authors. That said, this is the only time I have found anything of use on the viXra... — darij grinberg Feb 3 '16 at 23:56
Anyway I'll surely be back soon. See you all for now! =)
The question on MO got 2k views and there are no examples there other than the above comment and an answer which lists some papers by the vixra founder. So I doubt that I would be able to find more.
Hello dear folks, may i ask if there is deleted questions about fermat semi primes that can be found somehow ?
 
3 hours later…
10:12
@Abr001am I have responded in another room, since your question seems off-topic here. (If the room owner wishes to do so, I guess that these two messages could be moved to that room, too.)
 
3 hours later…
13:06
My impression is that I have seen quite a few questions along the lines of $\lim_{x\to\infty} \sqrt{x+1}-\sqrt x$ or $\lim_{x\to\infty} (\sqrt{x^2+x}-x)$.
I am not really sure whether we can find a regex that would catch such questions. I have tried %\lim%infty%\sqrt%{%+%}%-\sqrt% and %\lim%infty%\sqrt%{%+%}%-% in SEDE.
Duplicates of the second one were discussed in CRUDE: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/2165/2016/1/30

« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (111 days later) »