« first day (866 days earlier)      last day (909 days later) » 

00:21
true
 
6 hours later…
06:17
Is there a way to force a function to not vectorise?
As in?
Wdym
How else can I explain
Example?
With , I want ["a", "b", "c", "d"] to result in "a", ["b", "c", "d"] if that makes sense
Doesn't it already do that?
!!/run `abcd`f :, ḣ x P
06:23
[@emanresuA: 61899722]
⟨ `a` | `b` | `c` | `d` ⟩
⟨ `a` | ⟨ `b` | `c` | `d` ⟩ ⟩
Hmm, that's not what it did for me...
I'll try again
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If you're running a local copy, make sure to upgrade it
@emanresuA Oh yeah it does, I'm just stupid lol
 
2 hours later…
08:23
Both Jelly and 05AB1E beat my answer to this question, not acceptable. How can it be golfed down?
08:41
I can get you a W over jelly but 1 off 05ab1e
@tybocopperkettle żðvṀṪƛĖ+?$% + s flag
I'll work on finding a 10
ẏv₍ẎȯḢṠ%∑ would work for flagless 9 if there wasn't a bug
which bug, hmm
i think that its not good to send python debug details into stderr
that when the result of ȯ starts with a 0, sympy errors
like this
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/Vyxal/mysite/vyxal/main.py", line 196, in execute_vyxal
    exec(code, locals() | globals())
  File "<string>", line 90, in <module>
  File "/home/Vyxal/mysite/vyxal/elements.py", line 3099, in monadic_minimum
    if len(lhs) == 0:
TypeError: object of type 'int' has no len()
that's not debug
@lyxal hmm, not something that can be fixed easily
08:52
that's an actual error that happened
@NumberBasher well actually it is easily fixed
@NumberBasher strip leading 0s before sympyifying
then why not fix it?
I was entering this into vyxal: txtpad.cn/wefewgweg
so debug shows stuff raised by the compiler
@NumberBasher don't have the time right now
I've just come from a 2 hour uni workshop and I need a rest
09:10
@lyxal Oh that is smart. Do you wanna make your own answer?
 
1 hour later…
10:19
Why do we still have kn? It almost always errors due to breaking vy_type
10:44
@lyxal i can try to fix it , but could you tell me how to i haven’t Pythoned in a while lol
 
1 hour later…
12:07
@tybocopperkettle nah, you can have it
@user tbh I haven't either lol
12:42
Lyxal opened PR #1410 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:fix-ȯ-with-integers-that-have-leading-0s → Vyxal:main): Make ȯ work with integers that would give a slice starting with 0
12:57
Fixed it yourself lol
 
2 hours later…
14:35
So you know how there was that big discussion on tips and OWCs?
Well the real winner there was us
in The Nineteenth Byte, 1 hour ago, by pxeger
I think it's not really different to if someone posted a tech support / "why isn't my code working" question about Jelly or Vyxal
in The Nineteenth Byte, 14 mins ago, by pxeger
We have users who have posted Vyxal questions to Code Review. Why didn't they post them here? Because they would be off-topic. They could be described as non-objective questions about "How do I make this code nicer", but they're still pretty clearly off-topic. They just happen to be about an esolang
in The Nineteenth Byte, 5 mins ago, by Radvylf Programs
SO is almost entirely for practical code and finding bugs. They might put up with some esolang questions about fixing Vyxal or BF bugs, but polyglotting or restricted source on SO is way more out of place than it is here
As you can see, we've sort of become the default language to use for comparisons
and those messages also provide a sort of subliminal advertising
/hj btw
in The Nineteenth Byte, 1 min ago, by caird coinheringaahing
@RadvylfPrograms We keep going round in circles: I make a point, saying that I believe the site should require OWC for all challenges because of X, Y, Z. You then say you disagree, and nothing more. I don't really think this discussion is productive
> I don't really think this discussion is productive
See Caird that's where you're wrong
it's hella productive
you just gotta look at it from the right angle :p
speaking of tips, I really need to check our tips question more often lol
there's some good stuff there
 
8 hours later…
22:45
Steffan153 merged PR #1410 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:fix-ȯ-with-integers-that-have-leading-0s → Vyxal:main): Make ȯ work with integers that would give a slice starting with 0
Steffan153 deleted branch Vyxal/fix-ȯ-with-integers-that-have-leading-0s
can someone review #1407 and #1406?
Also, when will someone fix parallel apply? It annoys me constantly.
Steffan153 created branch Vyxal/yeet-kn
Steffan153 opened PR #1411 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:yeet-kn → Vyxal:main): Yeet `kn`
23:19
Steffan153 opened PR #1412 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:add-gridify → Vyxal:main): Add element to gridify

« first day (866 days earlier)      last day (909 days later) »