I mean that post is an amazing answer, don't get me wrong
But wow. I haven't seen an answer with that many upvotes in a very long time
@EddieKal I'm not sure you should keep asking boundary-pushing questions until we clear up the muddiness in the definition of literature
I think you might have a different view of literature than perhaps other people
Oof my rep. Losing 100 is kinda big if you have only 1k. That kind of hurt to look, but I honestly want to clarify that question, at least some sort of attempt
@NorthLæraðr But I think we could do that as two separate enterprises. After all, what is literature and what is on topic are two different things, aren't they?
@EddieKal True, but your definition of literature doesn't seem to match most other people's.
I voted to leave it open, btw. I think it's alright bc of Hamlet's post. But is it seriously necessary to keep pushing the boundary like that? Especially when such definition is blurred and where we ourselves don't really know what consider off-topic?
You're trying to push a hazy boundary around and I get where you're coming from, but I don't think most people do is the problem
And as evidenced by the -3 downvotes on my "What is Literature" question, apparently, people either think that's off-topic on a literature site or they just don't care to know bc it would seem straightforward
Just bc the definition of literature varies from scholar to scholar I see no reason why that need be downvoted. Honestly, geez
@NorthLæraðr What I am doing is minesweeping. Ever played Minesweeper? Sooner or later someone would have to step in a minefield, either wittingly or otherwise. I'd rather it's my posts that are getting all the downvotes and closevotes than some new user who doesn't know any better, just so we could have a better delineation of the site scope
@GWarner Our scope is very inclusive - don't worry about something being "not proper literature" or anything like that. Pulp fiction from the '80s, epic poetry from the 800s, everything goes.
@NorthLæraðr It's bizarre, isn't it? It's not a bad answer, but it didn't take much in the way of effort. I find it best to imagine the process as the whim of the HNQ gods, bestowing favour quite at random.
@EddieKal "Sooner or later someone would have to step in a minefield" ⟵ why not just fence it off and leave it for later generations to deal with? Like the Zone Rouge?
@NorthLæraðr Ouch. Now I need to do my research within the next seven days instead of taking a few weeks. And I had turned List of bounties with no deadline into a featured meta post just a few weeks ago.
@NorthLæraðr (67 upvotes now) If a question about a popular fantasy author or a popular comic becomes HNQ, it gets upvoted much more highly than other HNQ questions. I've never read Tolkien but if I wanted to benefit from this bias towards fantasy, I should.
In 2008 I read a book (fiction) about a boy living with a carnival. The carnival was a bunch of radical environmentaists. I can't recall the title or the author so I'm hoping somebody on here can help me.
I read the book whilst sitting beside my mother's bed in hospital and I have brain dog about...
@NorthLæraðr Yes, because discussing in chat doesn't solve the problem that we don't know the boundaries of the site. Only posting actual questions will, because then we'll see what kinds of questions our visitors like, and what they are willing to try to answer. Many of our experts won't be participating in the chat discussions or tell their opinion on the meta, but we will be able to see what questions they like and what they don't.
@Tsundoku I don't know, I never felt pressure like that. Like, Game of Thrones is already popular on Sci Fi, so Game of Thrones questions will get a lot of good answers from other people, why would I need to help that? If anything, I should help the less popular topics that I already enjoy, as in Jules Verne or Stanisław Lem.
@b_jonas I know what you mean, but if you invest several days into a question (rereading an entire novel or play and reading secondary literature) and your answer gets ignored, while other questions get dozens of upvotes because fantasy is popular, you begin to wonder why you would continue submitting your answers here instead of just posting them on your own website.
Also it's possible to post boundary-pushing questions that are also HNQs. You managed with literature.stackexchange.com/q/15437/139 , and unusual questions like the underwear ones always get more attention.
Some people here still venerate Hamlet, who left the site three years ago. Hamlet wanted answers based on deep analysis, but when you look at voting behaviour on that type of answers, that tells a different story...
@Tsundoku You have to always consdier that the votes depend not only on how much the users like the answer, but also on how many ever look at the answer, which depends on how popular the topic is so they even open the question.
Among others, this means that you get much more votes if you post an answer quickly after the question, because most users won't look at a question more than once, so if it doesn't yet have the answer the first time they see it in active, they will never see your answer. It also means that linking to questions from elsewhere (in other answers or comments or chat or even other websites) can help.
@b_jonas Just look at the "views" before and after the answer was posted. I have seen questions where the views went up without changing the votes on the answer. That includes questions where the OP was active on the site and probably saw the answer.
I do a lot of such linking, which is why I have a lot of announcer badges (mostly for Sci Fi, but many other SE sites). I do that not really for the votes, but to perhaps get new users interested in SE sites.
@Tsundoku Well, answers can get lost if there are lots of other answers, that's the flip side of answering popular questions.
I usually don't care too much about the votes though. I'm here to have fun, the imaginary internet points are nice but I get them anyway, I don't optimize for them too much.
@b_jonas What I want to say is that thorough analysis takes time. If people don't bother looking at such answers, rewarding mostly new stuff or fantasy, they don't exactly encourage that kind of research. It's a way of saying, "Pff, we're not really interested, so don't bother."
@Tsundoku Sometimes I even consider not upvoting an overly-popular answer, even if it's good, just because it's not that much better than others with lower scores.
I also try to compensate with bounties sometimes, but I favouritise lower-rep users with bounties (trying to get more people into the higher rep privilege levels), so you/Gareth are unlikely to get any from me despite your many outstanding answers :-)
@Tsundoku This is an understandable emotional response but it's not really fair — it's not that the people read the low-effort Tolkien answer and the high-effort obscure poetry answer and decided the former was better than the latter, it's a combination of (i) the site's algorithm showed them the former and not the latter; and (ii) even if they saw the obscure poetry question they would not have felt in a position to judge whether the answer was good or bad
@GarethRees Another unfortunate effect is that votes tend to skew towards the posts from early in the site's history, especially private beta period, because more people were actively around and voting on the site back then. Unfortunate because a lot of answers from those days were either out-and-out bad or at least less good than many later ones after there was more of a push to improve quality and more high-quality contributors arrived.
If you compare the scores of content from Jan '17 and say '18-'19, they're really not correlated with quality, even with no HNQ effect.
Authors like Shakespeare and Camus, both of whom are also read in schools. (I'm not saying that all answers requiring serious analysis get virtually ignored, but some have been.)
@GarethRees That's their decision, not enforced by SE. They can see those answers if they choose to do so.
Another unfortunate effect is that longer analysis-based answers take more effort to read than shorter low-effort ones.
For example, I've seen you posted a few long Camus answers recently, which are probably good, but I haven't had time to read them in order to vote responsibly on them.
@Tsundoku I don't think this line of thinking takes into account the way the HNQ mechanism works. People are attracted to click on a post by an intriguing question title, and one of the things that makes a title intriguing is enough familiarity with the subject matter to understand what it is asking. What we're seeing is a population effect (the Stack Exchange audience is more familiar with Tolkien than with Shakespeare)
@Knight Shakespeare apparently did not write his plays for publication but for performance by the theatre company in which he was a shareholder. Publication was something the company decided after a number of performances - but not for all his plays. Plays were simply not as highly regarded as poetry in those days.
@Tsundoku It's funny somehow that Shakespeare is so venerated now, when in its time much of his work was basically cheap entertainment, complete with dirty jokes.
@Randal'Thor I think people recognized pretty quickly that Shakespeare's plays were something special — his funerary monument in Stratford-upon-Avon was built prior to 1623, and people put a lot of work into the Folio edition
Audiences at the Blackfriars' Theatre were fincially better off, but it seems their taste in plays wasn't significantly different from that of the groundlings in Southwark.
@Randal'Thor But Tsundoku just said that poetry was highly valued, and Shakespeare wrote sonnets too. Maybe he got venerated for those, and because of that, people look at the stage pieces too.
Hmm, there's an interesting thought. I've never paid much attention to Shakespeare's sonnets. Of course his plays were written to be performed, and turned into books later, but where were his sonnets originally published?
One of the Peruvian writer Sui-Yun's Four Short Poems (translated from Spanish by Jennifer Shyue) is written as addressed to "Eve, my eternal mother".
I hope I'm not being excessively dirty-minded in reading the verse about "licking the tip of evil" as a sexual reference: particularly in light of...
@Randal'Thor archive.org has a first edition so you can see for yourself that they were printed in London by George Eld for publisher Thomas Thorpe
There is some evidence that the sonnets circulated in manuscript form prior to their printing, as there is a variant of sonnet 2 whose manuscripts are listed by the CELM
In "Stolen Ingots" in Dr. Thorndyke's Case-Book by R. Austin Freeman, Mr. Badger was standing on a bridge watching a boat running with a stolen case.
Badger cursed volubly, and, turning to the fishermen, exclaimed in a rather offensively peremptory tone:
“I want a boat. Now. This instant.”
T...
@Randal'Thor His narrative poems, published in the 1590s, were published with much more attention to textual correctness than the plays. They were published by Thomas Thorpe, whom Shakespeare probably knew from Stratford. His sonnets weren't published until 1609, when the great vogue for publishing sonnet cycles had apparently already passed.
> It does not follow, however, that the right to criticise Shakespeare involves the power of writing better plays. And in fact - do not be surprised at my modesty- I do not profess to write better plays.
@Knight Unlike some Restoration playwrights, who created adaptations of some of Shakespeare's plays, such as a King Lear version with a happy end. I believe John Dennis though he could write a better version of The Merry Wives of Windsor; one of his other plays was take off the theatre programme after the first performance because the audience disliked it too much ...
"do not be surprised at my modesty": secretly fishing for compliments? ;-)
However, John Dryden's All for Love, an imitation of Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, has remained successful after the Restoration and is still regularly staged.
@GarethRees In a sense I am future generations and I am getting blown up as I send feelers to test the waters (land). I may as well be taking a tour in Croatia
> If technical facility were the secret of greatness in art, Mr. Swinburne would be greater than Browning and Byron rolled into one, Stevenson greater than Scott or Dickens, Mendelssohn than Wagner, Maclise than Madox Brown.
@Tsundoku You left a couple of comments with what are probably typos ("has" seems more natural than "as", although I suppose "as" could also make sense).
@NorthLæraðr You don't get any badge for being awarded one.
@EddieKal "The universe speaks in many languages, but only one voice. It speaks in the language of hope; it speaks in the language of trust; it speaks in the language of strength and the language of compassion; it is the language of the heart and the language of the soul. But always it is the same voice. It is the voice of our ancestors, speaking through us, and the voice of our inheritors, waiting to be born. It is the small, still voice that says: We are one. No matter the blood, no matter the skin, no matter the world: We are one."
Congratulations to @MatrimCauthon, @Riker, and @Spagirl on breaking 6k reputation, and to @Spagirl on breaking into the top 8 users.
I wanted to wait and congratulate muru on 6k too, but he's been stuck one upvote away and letting people overtake him ;-)
In "Stolen Ingots" in Dr. Thorndyke's Case-Book by R. Austin Freeman, there was a boat that chases a barge in a tidal river and amongst muddy banks:
Meanwhile the fugitive barge, having got some two miles start, seemed to be drawing ahead. But it was only at intervals that we could see her, for ...
Are there any websites designed for asking real people for specific book recommendations? I know there are websites where you can enter your reading preferences and have an algorithm give you recommendations, and that here on Literature Stack Exchange asking for help finding a book that you know ...
@NorthLæraðr Might be worth mentioning that she's "Asian Peruvian", I think from a Chinese background, since apparently both cultures may play into her writing. (See comments under my question.)
I don't know which "Sui" that is, but China had a Sui dynasty just before the Tang dynasty. Short-lived but probably more important than most people think.
It could be a nom de plume, since Chinese names usually follow the pattern "one syllable for the family name + two syllables for the given name", but they don't always do that.
> La premonición se cumplió y en el año de la cabra de 1955 nació en la ciudad de Iquitos Sui-Yun, que en el idioma chino significa la flor que se abre.
Are there any websites designed for asking real people for specific book recommendations? I know there are websites where you can enter your reading preferences and have an algorithm give you recommendations, and that here on Literature Stack Exchange asking for help finding a book that you know ...
@EddieKal Googling "Katie Wong Loo" gave me this page in Spanish and this academic paper mentioning "the poet Sui-Yun (Katie Wong Loo de Geitz, b. 1955) has published poetry marked by Christian-Taoist mysticism as well as by her long-time residence in Spain, United States, France, and Germany."
> Tenía apenas 16 años cuando se unió a un grupo de chinos veteranos que de Cantón se enrumbaron con destino al Perú. Alfonso Wong On, hijo del gran médico Wong Siu-Tong, llegó a las costas peruanas aproximadamente en 1930, luego se trasladó a Iquitos al encuentro de su hermano mayor Emilio.
Family name Wong
She wouldn't have had contact with pinyin growing up unless through a conscious decision
From When the Emperor Was Divine, by Julie Otsuka:
He put down his suitcase and looked at her.
"Did you..." she [the mother] said
"Every day," he [the father] replied. Then he got down on his knees and he took us into his arms and over and over again, he uttered our names, but still we could n...
@Bookworm Books like that are good for increasing awareness (although I never read concentration camp stories). I wasn't even aware that that happened. Wow.
> I don't want any of them [persons of Japanese ancestry] here. They are a dangerous element. There is no way to determine their loyalty... It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen, he is still a Japanese. American citizenship does not necessarily determine loyalty... But we must worry about the Japanese all the time until he is wiped off the map.
swearing redacted
Not much moral superiority over the Axis powers there.
"for an influential work that with linguistic ingenuity has explored the periphery and the specificity of human experience."
That's culled from Peter Handke's Nobel recognition, but my point is things like concentration camp and suffering under racism are also part of human experience
@Randal'Thor Ever read The Man in the High Castle?
@Randal'Thor I was going to say Dick--as much as I like him and think of him as a genius--completely ignored the Japanese American experience in that book and made it a story told from White middle class Americans
@Randal'Thor I don't know if you are a Star Trek fan, but if you follow George Takei, you will on social media you will see how much he talks about his painful family history
@Tsundoku Because there is none I believe
Orthography is dead in Japan. One of the few "Western" concepts they don't treasure
I see. But it never worked very well without kana, did it? As far as I know, the Japanese developed kana because Chinese hanzi did not fit their language very well. (But I know they reduced the number of kanji in the 20th century.)
That reminds me of a teacher of Japanese who admitted many people (including herself, I think) did not know kanji very well. She even taught the stroke order of 七 incorrectly...
@Tsundoku I was going to say, if you asked that, it's another instance of someone asking about something they were already confident enough to put in their profile :-P
@EddieKal Some of the Trekkies on SFF convinced me to give TNG a try, and I watched a couple of seasons, but the disconnected "planet/alien of the week" episodes and lack of overall plot or development failed to hook me. I later discovered Babylon 5 and now disdain Star Trek even more than back when all I had to raise above it in the world of TV sci-fi was Doctor Who. TL;DR: no, not a fan.
@Tsundoku Character tags are quite controversial at SFF, but they do exist in many of the bigger franchise tags, so it's plausible that one day there'll be a rand-althor tag.
Interesting. People get stroke orders wrong all the time, but Japanese people who are able to reach a certain mark in their high school Japanese class should be able to read and write basic kanji
I have a friend who was not good at writing kanji (I think he reads okay). I don't know how bad he was, but he went to college in the US
That's very unusual for Japanese kids. Most people stay in Japan.
I thought it might be because he couldn't pass Japanese subject exams