Related: How should we view Dan Conway?
First, a quote from the opening scene of the book:
"Who is John Galt?"
The light was ebbing, and Eddie Willers could not distinguish the bum's face. The bum had said it simply, without expression. But from the sunset far at the end of the street, yel...
I hate to beat a dead horse, but if you want an example of musical quality as literature, there's an amazing album that was just released: the Hadestown Original Cast Recording
user61230
It's a wonderful example, specifically because the way the music intertwines with the lyrics is so fundamental to experiencing the story.
I'm not necessarily against easy questions - they can help to improve our site's SEO, as well as maybe giving less confident people a foothold in answering here.
Sometimes "does not show research effort" -> DV seems to be at odds with the goal of building a repository of knowledge and becoming the top result on Google.
(I'm sure some Bestower of Excellent Stack Wisdom will have some interesting thoughts on this too ... ;-) )
@Randal'Thor Basically, "can find it on Google" is a pretty lame excuse for invoking "did not do the research" if there's any other kind of research the querent did--partly because it's bad to expect everyone to use Google, and partly because if we want to be the Google search result... but refuse to host any material that's already on Google... um.
In my experience, "shows no research effort" is a poor voting justification in most Stacks anyways. It's usually code for "I could do the research easily and lack the imagination or empathy to understand that other people might lack my skills, experience, or specific context that make it so easy for me."
And when that's not the case, it's still a snipe hunt that results in frustrated users no longer asking questions because they don't think they can "prove" to the community's satisfaction that they did the research--and if they do try, their research justification overshadows the question itself and the question becomes "unclear."
It's important, as always, to evaluate a site mechanic in the context of the goal it's designed to achieve.
What site quality are we actually cultivating when we downvote questions which don't explicitly state their previous research efforts?
Is it a quality this site lacks and needs active cultivation? Is it a quality this site needs, or is it an artefact of the original Stack's requirements and is unnecessary in a Stack 2.0+ environment?
@BESW This, so much this. It's depressingly common (not specifically here, but on SE in general) for people to blindly apply "the rules" without stopping to think about why those rules exist, what their underlying purpose is, what they're there to achieve.
And, if the quality is desirable and requires active cultivation to get this Site to display it... are there negative side effects of the application which outweigh the benefits?
There's a conservative tendency in many social groups to take rules, once established, as congruent with good.
Human rules and laws are often created, in theory at least, to promote and sustain good. But they are not inherently good themselves; their goodness is granted by virtue of their effects, rather than their effects being good by virtue of emerging from rules.
It's certainly easier to conflate rules with goodness, oh my yes.
(It's really kind of scary how much tabletop RPGs are a microcosm of social order.)
Debates about rules vs adjudication and their effects depending on the group's play goals, are little mirrors into broad philosophical issues of law and governance.
Anyway, I propose this question: what documentable problem is lit.se facing due to a lack of research in our questions?
Not what problem might we face later; what thing detrimental to the site is happening because of a real or supposed lack of prior research on questions?
A lack of research itself is not a detriment; it can only be a cause of a problem, it's that problem we need to consider--it could be that the problem won't be solved by downvoting lack-of-research questions, or that it's not a problem at all.
There's a concept in design that I like to call "use by superstitious ritual." It's where you know that pushing the pedal and turning the wheel does something with your car, but you don't understand why or how.
You have rituals which you rely on to produce results without any concept of how the ritual relates to the result.
It usually also means you have extra unnecessary rituals (like pushing in the shift-stick button to change between forward-moving gears), or miss certain actions which aren't obviously necessary but will have long-term bad effects (like not changing your oil).
We can't effectively curate a Stack by superstitiously applying the rituals learned on other Stacks.
We need to understand how the gamification works, what it accomplishes and why it wants to accomplish those things.
@Randal'Thor A lot of meta questions regarding the use of site mechanics begin as XY problems.
^ That... is a joke. I'm making a point and trying to give an example of this type of question. My real question is:
What should we do (if anything) about questions that suffer from the XY problem? Are these types of questions "OK" here?
If you're not familiar with what an XY problem question l...
@BESW Well, questions lacking research might not be, to quote Ash, "OMG THE MOST LITERATURE LITERARY THING EVER".
On a slightly related note:
Example: a question about the author's intended message in a particular book got this comment: This question confuses author's intentions with a story's meaning. Asking about author's intentions in this way is not a valid academic lens to understand literature. More importantly, these types of questions lead to very uninteresting answers. The OP (who's no longer active here) pointed out that asking about an author's intentions is perfectly legitimate, and they aren't looking for an "academic lens to understand literature", but nevertheless got an answer they and others found interesting. — Rand al'Thor2 mins ago
What's the context, though? Was the question trying to gain insight in the text's meaning and actually confusing both? Or was it genuinely just asking for the author's intentions? In that latter case, yeah, that comment would be...quite odd.
In the former case, I could understand the commenters concerns.
But disregarding the question's intent it's also...interesting that it's downright eschewed as a valid academic lens altogether. I thought there were about 5 million of these lenses to be applied for maximum insight. But I'm admittedly no expert on this either.
Beautiful Libraries series, Trinity College, Dublin (2012) by German photographer Candida Höfer, known for her inte… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/874180869434613760
Hi! You're probably looking for the movies.se chat rooms. Each site on the Stack Exchange has its own dedicate set of rooms; this one's for literature.se.
For mechanical information about chatting, the FAQ is useful.
Most Stack sites have a "main" chat room for general conversation (like this one!), while for specific talks about, say, workshopping a particular question, other chat rooms are created. Some rooms are more active than others, and to some extent each has its own culture, but every part of the Stack Exchange network is expected to be nice.
As you can see, sometimes conversations in a room can overlap. Making new rooms is largely a matter of keeping that from getting too confusing. Remember, there's no such thing as private communication on the Stack Exchange; no DMs or any similar function is available to ordinary users. Everything we say is archived and aggressively seeded to Google's search bots.
@Randal'Thor Rand and BESW - I have read a few of your preceding posts and agree so much with what you both are saying. I am (very) new here and am amazed at the amount of resistance and sheer unwillingness to grant some slack I think I am perceiving from the part of, basically, users with very high posts and points counts.
Closing or putting a question on hold seems something like a "shooting from the hip" reaction mostly which I sincerely regret as it is discouraging to someone who really did ask his question as succinctly and clearly as possible but which still did not seem to get someone's benediction.
Unfortunately there aren't any stats about the amount of comments being left.
But if I remember correctly, I think the increase in downvoting at the time was being driven by questions about things such as music, where people were downvoting rather than closing.
@BESW BESW, why should I? I just go the idea of trying out the chat while I was perusing literature.stackexchange... this does not seem so out of whack to me.
Since the question is talking about how to be more welcoming, I thought I would take a look at how this site welcomes new members in the past few days since this question was asked.
It's been a mixed bag tbh.
Good
I thought that the community did a good job handling the question Understanding...
@ObiwanKeNoobie I'm not saying you should. Just that it's an assumption I made based on prior experience.
@Hamlet I was prominent in a campaign to improve RPG.SE's comment ethos, just by spending a few months finding every new person's first post and commenting a friendly welcome customized with some link to the help or meta which would assist them based on their particular question/answer.
Just saying "hi" doesn't work; it gives people warm fuzzies but doesn't actually get folks engaged with the informed action that makes a Stack tick and keeps users around.
@ObiwanKeNoobie ...yes. Hence the "probably" at the beginning; I was offering information that's very often useful to people who ask that kind of question.
@ObiwanKeNoobie Sorry, I'm engaging in two conversations at once. The "hi" comment is to @hamlet and the conversation about main-site comment culture.
@Hamlet Yes, I think people are being driven away. I just came from biology.stackexchange where a new user had asked a question but it was put on hold (or closed, not sure right now) because it was allegedly not clear enough, however I was ready to reply to it because to me it was clear enough. I couldn't though because it was closed.
@BESW BESW, ah sorry. So am I I guess. I too was saying "hi" thus the (small) confusion.
@Mithrandir Mithrandir, sometimes the causes of war are trivial. Look at WW I.
Sure the death of an archiduke would not be cause enough to put half the planet on fire, would it?
The assassination of the Austrian archduke was, considered in the context of all Europe's near-explosive politics, a relatively minor event. So how did it cause such a major war?
When a new user posts their first question, there is often a need to clarify certain aspects of how this site works. This is usually done by a friendly comment starting with "Welcome to the site" or something similar followed by an explanation such as in this question. I always thought these were...
I'll have to leave you people for the time being as fate calls me elsewhere, I hope to discuss the WW I think yet. Anyway this was an interesting chat I've had here thks and bye
The "prose Edda", as opposed to the "poetic Edda" was written in the 13th century by Snorri Sturlusson as we know.
The older, poetic Edda is much older.
How old could it actually be? There seems to be a possibility there is a linguistic connection with the name "Veda" - the old Indian Vedas - w...
Can you expand on the possible linguistic connection? What's the link? — yannis7 mins ago
@BESW @Randal'Thor here's an interesting case study about the value of requiring research effort.
On the one hand, many of the question's claims don't really hold up to scrutany.
On the other hand, the question itself is answerable.
@Randal'Thor any interest in writing a meta post about this?
The source for this possible connection is a comment from Rudolf Steiner in a lecture given in early 20th century about the Edda. I don't have the reference here as I read it a few years ago but it should be relatively easy to find. Personally, I am enclined to accept the existence of wider connections between cultures, the farther we go back in history. — Obiwan KeNoobie4 mins ago
Rudolf Joseph Lorenz Steiner (27 (or 25) February 1861 – 30 March 1925) was an Austrian philosopher, social reformer, architect and esotericist. Steiner gained initial recognition at the end of the nineteenth century as a literary critic and published philosophical works including The Philosophy of Freedom. At the beginning of the twentieth century he founded an esoteric spiritual movement, anthroposophy, with roots in German idealist philosophy and theosophy; other influences include Goethean science and Rosicrucianism.
In the first, more philosophically oriented phase of this movement, Steiner...
My personal feelings about the value of demonstrating research in questions are a bit confused at the moment.
@Hamlet It should be said Steiner was extremely knowledgeable about ancient cultures, mythology and religion; he was also the maintainer of the Goethe library in Weimar (amongst other things) </end of short impromptu appearance>
Someone recommended Pack Challenge by Shelly Laurenston to me. It's erotica FYI--not really sure if this is the place for questions about that, but I thought I would try anyway. The main character has this obsession with the words slut and whore, and I'm starting to find it annoying
She glanc...
What are the origins of putting epigraphs in a work?
Wikipedia has this example from 1700, but no explanation on when or why epigraphs came into vogue.
Facsimile of the original title page for William Congreve's The Way of
the World published in 1700, on which the epigraph from Horace's
...
It's #LibrariesWeek! Come check out our questions about #Libraries & #InformationScience, or ask your own! https://literature.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/library-and-information-science
@EJoshuaS - hey, would you mind adding a bit more info to the tag wiki excerpts you're creating, and do a bit more research before submitting? For instance, your suggested edit for [jane-eyre] was For questions regarding the life and works of Jane Eyre., but that's a book, not an author. You can also include a bit more info about the author in the wiki and not just for the lives and works of, like your proposed wiki for Jules Verne.
@Hamlet Hamlet, I never mentioned anything about his "involvement in 'esoteric spiritual movements'". I can assure you he did't miss out a lot on contemporary science as he was well rounded in sciences as well as in the literary and philosophical department. You should inform yourself. "Modern scholarship" still didn't discover lots of things. Most important thinking was done hundreds and thousands of years ago.
@ObiwanKeNoobie ""Modern scholarship" still didn't discover lots of things." With all due respect, if we're talking about linguistics/ancient languages, modern scholarship is where things are at.
In The War Between the Classes, the class sets up four levels of classes: Blue, the highest class; Dark Green, the lower high class; Light Green, the higher low class; and Orange, the lowest of the low.
Is there a direct parallel to actual social prejudices for each color? E.g., Orange represent...
The fifth verse of "The Sound of Silence" runs thusly:
And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the sign said:
"The words of the prophets are
Written on the subway walls
And tenement halls...
@Mithrandir of course, no one really left a comment explaining why they downvoted, so it's hard/impossible to have a conversation about what should be downvoted, and what makes for good content
The problem with comments for downvotes is that most of us (across the entire Stack Exchange) are very bad at explaining why we downvoted in a way that could actually lead to improving the question.
A while ago, I asked a question trying to find a high-quality, reliable translation for a particular work.
To date, no comments have been posted offering helpful insight as to why the question is below quality, while existing meta precedent says very explicitly that these questions are categoric...
@Mithrandir not entirely sure what you mean by "an image would be nice", but downvoting and leaving the comment, in my personal opinion, is the right thing to do and is a sign of a healthy Q&A community
@Mithrandir Oh, cool. I haven't really been keeping up with the developments on MSE/SE blog recently. It looks good, but will take some getting used to :)
> I'd like to point out the second verse is all about failures. "Your faith was strong but you needed proof" probably references Gideon, who had God perform miracles to prove that he was really the one God wanted. "You saw her bathing on the roof / Her beauty and the moonlight overthrew ya" references, of course, David and Bathsheba - David saw her, killed Bathsheba's husband, and took her as wife.
and the rest of that paragraph
But when it comes time to answer the specific question
you kind of trail off a little bit
> He's in awe of the grandeur of God - this is a theme throughout the Old Testament as well, so this isn't really a reference to the next verse.
This isn't quite as convincing. It would be improved if you connected the lyrics of the song with quotes from the old/new testament.
Ditto for this
> He's in awe that in spite of his failures, God is still listening to him, and being pleased by his work. (There's references to this in the Psalms, as well.) I mean - he was God's chosen, but then he killed someone and took their wife. God was displeased with him, but forgave him and loved him still. That's outright baffling, that kind of forgiveness. He's also, in that sense, thanking God with his hallelujah - a thank you for being forgiven.
@heather tldr it's an improvement on your previous answers, but it could be improved by connecting quotes from the song to quotes from the bible during the parts where you actually answer the question asked by Mith.