« first day (4948 days earlier)   

04:24
@Randal'Thor I don't follow. Since when is meta only about site-management questions? "When and how do you re-read" or "What was the best book you read in 2024" aren't site-management questions; they're discussions.
Meta isn't just for "how to run the site." The main site is for questions that solicit clear cut answers. Open-ended discussions with no "correct" answers belong on meta. As @GarethRees pointed out, there's already a question on there for finding texts of books. This seems like a corollary to that one focused on print rather than e-texts. — verbose 2 mins ago
04:42
@verbose both of those are asking for personal opinions/experiences. The main site Q is asking for a process/method to achieve a literature goal, which could be answered more or less definitively by an expert in book collecting.
[I voted to Leave Open in the CV queue]
@bobble Fair enough. I'm not entirely convinced but I take your point.
Recent books I listened to and enjoyed: Talking to Strangers (Malcolm Gladwell, sociology nonfiction) and Nice Dragons Finish Last (Rachel Aaron, urban fantasy). The first one comes wit a raft of content warnings: descriptions of sexual assault (including of children), torture, and police violence are the ones that I remember off the top of my head. The latter has minor amounts of violence, PG-13 level.
 
3 hours later…
07:34
@verbose They're not what the system is meant for; meta isn't supposed to handle non-site-management questions related to the topic of the site that aren't good fits for main - we're bending the system to a certain degree and allowing some, but questions that can fit on main instead are better off not going to meta
@Mithical Ah. Thanks for the clarification!

« first day (4948 days earlier)