« first day (4129 days earlier)      last day (513 days later) » 

7:16 AM
I flagged the "melted ice cream" question, commented on the "from the night" question, and left the citations question alone.
Wish I could find the previous question about citations that we had here. Unless I'm imagining it or getting confused with another site. Does this ring bells for anyone else?
 
7:48 AM
@Randal'Thor we have at least two about reading citations as opposed to writing them: literature.stackexchange.com/q/19064/139 literature.stackexchange.com/q/6143/139 . (we should tag those consistently.)
 
8:06 AM
literature.stackexchange.com/q/6143/139 is a deleted question on writing citations.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:07 AM
@b_jonas Ah, maybe that's what I was thinking of. Thanks.
(Duh, Rand, tags exist for a reason. I searched the site for the word "citations" but didn't think to search the tags list.)
@b_jonas This link is the same as one of the previous ones. Maybe you meant this one? (Which I voted to reopen and undelete, years ago before having mod powers.)
 
 
4 hours later…
12:49 PM
The question How much of “À la recherche du temps perdu” is autobiographical? has been edited and now has one reopen vote.
 
1:06 PM
indeed, I messed that up. I'll try to look up later what that link was supposed to be
 
 
4 hours later…
4:47 PM
Apr 11, 2019 at 22:08, by Bookworm
0
Q: Why are the locations of the publication offices required for citations?

Bill QuesyWhen I'm citing books, I need to mention the city in which the publisher's main office is in. Why would it really matter where the publisher's headquarters are? Most of them are in New York anyway...

^ @Randal'Thor deleted post about format of citations when writing one
that's the one I'd found earlier
 
Yeah. I thought it was a good question, but my undelete vote is still pending years later.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:52 PM
I don't have high rep here so I can't search the other deleted questions but I think there may have been more.
I mean chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59248470#59248470 is deleted too, but I don't think it's really what I'm thinking about
 
 
2 hours later…
9:52 PM
@b_jonas I have edited it and pushed it on to the review queue again.
 
@Tsundoku It can't go into any review queue while it's deleted.
 

« first day (4129 days earlier)      last day (513 days later) »