@BESW while academic “mainstream” can get things wrong, the idea that academia ignores challenges is usually an excuse to push theories that have no basis in the real world
how dare academics reject a theory just because there's no evidence for it!
I have no idea about the Bering Strait migration theory, but the language in that book's description is very typical of pseudoscience.
Pseudoscience as in, arguing that something is true, not because there's empirical evidence for it, but because it would be convenient for it to be true.
(That article also talks about the eagerness to reach extreme conclusions, which is not the same as psuedoscience.)
It's certainly true that a lot of our popular understanding of science --especially archaeology-- is based on deeply racist assumptions which are just as psuedoscientific by your definition.
Of course, the concept of species is deeply embedded in racist ideologies. Scientific racists, for example, argue that races are separate human species. This connection between racism and science is interesting to say the least.
The takeaway should be that the concepts and theories scientists use to explain data aren't necessarily objective. They're often based on hidden cultural assumptions.
Yesterday, I proposed to synonimise graphic-novel and comics (just like that, without consulting anyone). Afterwards, it's been pointed out to me that collecting the two may not be the best idea, since clearly graphic novels (whatever they are defined as) are somehow different from other comics.
...
@Gallifreyan ...someone needs to give it an answer (with a positive score?) so that the Roomba will stop deleting it. That's really the best solution :p
@Shokhet I've even found a link for the list of all fanfics about this stuff, but I haven't actually read any so I'll have to poke mods once in a while :)
Yesterday, I proposed to synonimise graphic-novel and comics (just like that, without consulting anyone). Afterwards, it's been pointed out to me that collecting the two may not be the best idea, since clearly graphic novels (whatever they are defined as) are somehow different from other comics.
...
I.e. if the question is to have both, then there's not enough space. If the question is to have only graphic-novel - does that mean we want them completely separated?
@Shokhet I would. I think the latter is a subset of the former.
If it's to ask which category a particular work belongs in (which is usually not a great question, IMO), then you wouldn't need any more tags after those
@Gallifreyan Aha. Which is another argument in favor of hierarchical tagging...
@Emrakul One of my concerns is when someone starts to apply graphic-novel, it'll leave questions that exist now out of the boat. It'll also create another problem - do we need yet another category tag?
@Gallifreyan what's wrong with making that decision once someone starts using the graphic-novel tag.
Right now only one person has an interest in using the tag (you). If we have five or six people interested in the tag, then we can start to get a consensus.
@Gallifreyan well, I don't know, maybe there's a valid use for the tag. There's no harm in waiting to see what happens. If people start abusing it, then we can take action.
The plot is a bit hazy for me since I read this novel years ago but can someone tell me if they know this book?
The plot:
Bomb goes off in the UK.
Building collapse and many people die.
Society starts to break down
The hero and his family own a shop and have hidden supplies w...
I've been following the 2016 Lucifer series, and enjoying it. While re-arranging my Calibre library, I noticed that, while all the issues up to and including 13th have been written by Holly Black, issue 14 was written by Black and Richard Kadrey, while issue after that were written by Kadrey alon...
Just 8 hrs to win a copy of @RealPeterBeagle’s THE NEW VOICES OF FANTASY - http://ow.ly/A1Tw30bBID6 @goodreads… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/866790861862055937