« first day (89 days earlier)      last day (513 days later) » 

05:08
@JohnRennie: Hi sir. Good morning :-)
@GuruVishnu hi :-)
@JohnRennie: Are you free now sir?
Ok sir. Just a continuation of yesterday's discussion.
The first green one gives the correct answer whereas the second red box gives the incorrect one.
OK ... ?
05:11
@JohnRennie Why is the component of one velocity along the another gives the correct result whereas the other way round gives the incorrect one?
How exactly does the second method fail? And what differentiates it from the first one?
Consider what happens when $\theta = 90°$. At this instant the mass is moving tangentially to the the string i.e. we momentarily have circular motion. Yes.
@GuruVishnu hello?
@JohnRennie Hi sir.
@JohnRennie I understood so far.
05:27
So at this moment $dL/dt = v = 0$ and $u \ne 0$.
@JohnRennie I didn't get why is $v=0$; isn't it non-zero all the time sir?
It's something an external agent like a motor maintains...
Consider this instant i.e. when the string is vertical. What is $dL/dt$ ?
@JohnRennie On a L-t graph, as the block moves left to right, we get an extrema when the string is perpendicular to the surface. And hence the derivative is zero.
Yes, so if the block is moving horizontally we must have $v = 0$.
Now I get your statement. I thought it was something like assuming $\theta$ to be a constant like I did yesterday which eventually led to the incorrect answer.
05:37
What this actually means is that $v/u = 0$ so if $v$ remains constant that would mean $u \to \infty$.
@JohnRennie How could that be possible then? This looks like a simple experimental setup and how could we go faster than the speed of light, sir?
In a real experiment if we held $v$ constant we we need to apply an increasing force as $\theta \to 90°$ and the block would lift up off the base.
Ok sir.
If we had some form of rails keeping the block moving horizontal then as $\theta \to 90°$ the force we would need to keep $v$ constant would go to infinity.
Ok sir. This seems much better to me.
But how to relate this with my confusion?
@JohnRennie sir?
05:45
I'm not really sure what your confusion is ...

« first day (89 days earlier)      last day (513 days later) »