@Malavika Sorry I didn't get it :-(

@Malavika Oh , Namaste to you too! . How are you ? Although judging by the tone of the chats you always seems very happy 😁

@Malavika :-D . Btw are you a student or you do some job or a full time musician ?

@Malavika I myself found it today :-)

@Malavika Can you post the timestamp ?

I personally liked 30 -40 seconds piece.

@Malavika Do you mean that stretch which goes from low to high pitch ?

@Malavika Ah , I liked the entire song . Hard to chose the which part I liked the most :-)

@Malavika Yes, I remember that (unlike Harimuraleeravam), this is a case where the audio was edited to make it look like it was done at a stretch. As I recall, Yesudas, in an interview or something, was appealing to contestants in music competitions not to attempt that, or maybe not to feel disappointed at not being able to do that, because it was actually achieved by manipulating the audio recording, and he did not sing it like that in real life

Whereas in Harimuraleeravam, the extended singing and the three-octave sangati immediately after that were done naturally, and, as is probably well-known, deliberately designed by Raveendran to show that Yesudas could still sing like that (because he'd been annoyed by some people's disparaging remarks about Yesudas' voice at the time)

@Malavika Good afternoon!

She's underrated bollywood singer