« first day (3064 days earlier)      last day (858 days later) » 

8:22 AM
Two links to springerlink.com: You may wish to look into the Lectures on Classical W-Algebras by L.A. Dickey. ... another introductory text by G.M.T. Watts.
Since I saw that the question "Introduction to W-Algebras/Why W-algebras?" was bumped by an edit, I checked whether there are some other things which should/could be edited there.
SEDE: data.stackexchange.com/mathoverflow/query/1379118/… (The activity will be seen after the next update.)
I have noticed this answer with some dead links:
5
A: Introduction to W-Algebras/Why W-algebras?

mathphysicistYou may wish to look into the Lectures on Classical W-Algebras by L.A. Dickey. Also, there are older lecture notes by C.N. Pope (intended for the physicists, I guess) and another introductory text by G.M.T. Watts.

The first one can be easily guessed - it is mentioned in a comment:
For Dickey see link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1017903416906 . I guess you know how to access the article. — Evgeny Kuznetsov Apr 21 '21 at 6:41
BTW the dead links were pointed out not too long ago:
Both of your links are dead by now, do you know any working ones? — მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Apr 21 '21 at 4:54
@მამუკაჯიბლაძე Maybe "introductory text by G.M.T. Watts" is W-algebras and their representations, DOI: 10.1007/BFb0105278, kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/5035855/kcl_mth_97_50.pdf (Since the original links is gone, we can only guess. But this seems line a reasonable guess it is also among the reference in the Wikipedia article on W-algebras - current revision). — Martin Sleziak 2 mins ago
> @მამუკაჯიბლაძე Maybe "introductory text by G.M.T. Watts" is W-algebras and their representations, DOI: 10.1007/BFb0105278, kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/5035855/kcl_mth_97_50.pdf (Since the original links is gone, we can only guess. But this seems line a reasonable guess it is also among the reference in the Wikipedia article on W-algebras - ...
 
8:50 AM
And there was a similar comment under the answer which was edited by David Roberts.
10
A: Introduction to W-Algebras/Why W-algebras?

Ben WebsterMy motivation for studying finite W-algebras comes from geometric representation theory; just as the universal enveloping algebra is a quantization of $\mathfrak{g}^*$ with its Kostant-Kirillov Poisson bracket, the W-algebra is a quantization of a Poisson reduction of $\mathfrak{g}^*$, the Slodow...

Could you revitalize the Gan&Ginzburg link please? — მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Apr 21 '21 at 4:20
@მამუკაჯიბლაძე arxiv.org/pdf/math/0105225.pdf ??? — Evgeny Kuznetsov Apr 21 '21 at 6:35
@EvgenyKuznetsov Thanks! Also the published version for those who have access: IMRN 5(2002) 243-255მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Apr 21 '21 at 9:10
 
 
1 hour later…
9:59 AM
Thanks a lot @Martin, your link is very helpful as usual! Regardless of whether it is the same or not, this seems to be an excellent text. — მამუკა ჯიბლაძე 1 hour ago
Introduction to W-Algebras/Why W-algebras? Would the tag be suitable for the question about W-algebas which was recently bumped?
22
Q: Introduction to W-Algebras/Why W-algebras?

Jan WeidnerDoes anyone know of an introduction and motivation for W-algebras? Edit: Okay, sorry I try to add some more background. W algebras occur, for example when you study nilpotent orbits: Take a nice algebraic/Lie group. It acts on its Lie-algebra by the adjoint action. Fix a nilpotent element e and m...

 
 
1 hour later…
11:05 AM
I always have difficulties working out what time is it in Australia. But sometimes both of us happen to be online at the same time. :-)
11 hours ago, by theHigherGeometer
@MartinSleziak good catch. I've updated the count for the posts that still need manual editing, it's down to 125 from 195 or so. If we slowly edit these to avoid flooding the front page they could be done by the middle of the year.
Concerning the counts, I'll mention that sometimes I post some stats in this chatroom - maybe you have noticed that. (Most recently on January 2.)
@theHigherGeometer OTOH when I thought about this more, I think it would be possible to replace the "new" links automatically without broking the old links even if the old ones aren't manually edited yet.
I might write here (or on meta?) a bit more about this when I have a bit more time.
 

« first day (3064 days earlier)      last day (858 days later) »