« first day (2348 days earlier)      last day (1560 days later) » 

8:41 AM
This is just a temporary comment - to get the linked questions in the sidebar updated: When are certain group C*-algebras exact?Martin Sleziak 9 secs ago
The question The definition of a group object is wrong? contains a link to this answer: Is there a “universal group object”? (answered: yes!) It is not shown in the sidebar.
This is just a temporary comment - in order to get the list of linked questions updated: Is there a “universal group object”? (answered: yes!)Martin Sleziak 15 secs ago
 
 
3 hours later…
11:25 AM
is one of the tags that are often used incorrectly - in the meaning for which the tag is intended.
There is a suggestion on meta to change name of this tag: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/194/help-improve-tagging/…
4
A: Help improve tagging!

Martin SleziakI suggest to rename the tag divisors in a way which distinguishes it more clearly from divisors-multiples. The tag-info for divisors (revision history) clearly says: For questions related to divisors in the sense of algebraic geometry (Cartier divisors, Weil divisors and so on). For question...

 
 
5 hours later…
4:29 PM
There are now 289 questions tagged .
 
 
1 hour later…
5:30 PM
A new tag was created by YCor. He also created a tag-excerpt.
1
Q: Group of divisibility of a commutative domain

RajnishWe know that the necessary condition for any partially ordered group to be a group of divisibility is that the group must be a directed group. What is the sufficient condtion for partially ordered group to be a group of divisibility?

4
Q: A linearly orderable monoid which does not embed into a linearly orderable group

Salvo TringaliIt is known (after an example of A.I. Mal'cev) that there exist cancellative semigroups which do not embed into a group. On the other hand, it is not difficult to see that every linearly orderable semigroup (is cancellative and torsion-free, and) embeds into a linearly orderable monoid (see here ...

 

« first day (2348 days earlier)      last day (1560 days later) »