@DavidRoberts That doesn't pass the litmus test, I think, but I do have some affection for Hungarian combinatorics... I would say nay, out of principle.
By limus test, I mean: Can I think of more than three contexts where one would search for this tag? Can I think of more than three people who might subscribe to notifications for this tag?
A tag that doesn't pass this test is not necessarily bad, it just needs more scrutiny.
[thesis] only has 13 questions, four closed, including this most recent one. Might be one to keep and eye on and slowly deprecate.
@DavidRoberts So I guess that by "slowly deprecate" you mean the we should remove the tag thesis from those questions manually. (But in such a way that we do not bump too many old questions to the frontpage.)
Or would it be better to make a post on meta about thesis before starting the manual removal? (I suppose an answer here would be a suitable place for that: Help improve tagging!)
I'm in favor of eliminating thesis and I'm happy to do my part if we can make an action list here so we can keep track. (And I can do my share with my morning coffee without thinking too much...)
Ok, let's see what David Roberts says about (thesis) - after all, the suggestion came from him.
It goes without saying that if manual removal of erdos or thesis gets a green light, I'll try to help too. (Naturally, not retagging too many questions at the time.)
For the record, we have all questions currently having the tag erdos or thesis saved here in chat.
"A thesis is a document submitted in support of candidature for an academic degree or professional qualification presenting the author's research and findings" and "A thesis (or dissertation) may be arranged as a thesis by publication or a monograph, with or without appended papers respectively."
Thanks for the response! I'll keep in mind that thesis is supposed to be removed - and I'll try start retagging. (I will do at most one question per day - naturally, if others want to do more, I won't object.)
In case somebody would want to check them later, the posts where this tag was manually removed can be found through SEDE, as mentioned here.
Do some MO oldtimers remember whether at some point in the distant past it was necessary to write \* or \` in some places to get *` or backslash? Like here: https://mathoverflow.net/posts/40612/revisions
Here is a bad heuristic argument for the prime number theorem. Let $n$ be a positive integer and assume that PNT holds up to $n$. Then $n$ itself is prime if and only if for each prime $p<n$ the event $p\mid n$ fails to hold. Assuming that all these events are independent, the probability that n ...