« first day (3367 days earlier)      last day (548 days later) » 

7:17 AM
3
Q: New tag for "stochastic partial differential equations" (SPDEs)

Thomas KojarSince there are separate tags for a) ODEs, ca.classical-analysis-and-odes and differential-equations and for b) ap.analysis-of-pdes but only one tag for stochastic-differential-equations, I was wondering if it is worth creating a new tag called "stochastic partial differential equations". This is...

Some context: (1) the tag info for stochastic-differential-equations includes: "Stochastic ordinary and partial differential equations" (2) at this date, the number of questions with given tag: ap.analysis-of-pdes: 3795; ca.classical-analysis-and-odes: 3141; differential-equations: 1460; stochastic-differential-equations: 472. — YCor 2 days ago
The topics mentioned by the OP are clearly covered by the current tag stochastic-differential-equations. Whether a split of the latter tag would be opportune and clearly defined would require more expertise on this topic and knowledge of the involved mathematical communities than I have. — YCor 2 days ago
I agree with both. — Thomas Kojar 2 days ago
It seems like a chicken-egg problem too. My thought is that by adding the SPDEs-tag it encourages more activity there too. — Thomas Kojar 2 days ago
This post seems to claim that there is a tag partial-differential-equations, but that tag does not seem to have any questions. Maybe you meant ap.analysis-of-pdes mentioned by @YCor? — LSpice 2 days ago
thank you, I added the discussion tag. — Thomas Kojar 31 mins ago
At the moment, this question is in the :
I have cast an upvote - mainly to get it to score +3. As you can see, it is now shown in the community bulletin: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/10243/2022/11/10 Let's hope that this helps to get more feedback from MO users. Since this is a proposal for a new tag, I guess it would be useful to mention what would be the name of the new tag. (Or what are possible alternatives, if they are several.) And what the tag-excerpt and the tag-info would look like. (And whether there will be changes to the existing ... — Martin Sleziak 3 mins ago
... tag-info for stochastic-differential-equations. As already mentioned, the tag currently includes SPDEs - after the creation of the new tag, will they be excluded from the old tag?) — Martin Sleziak 2 mins ago
Another natural question is what are the plans to do next if the tag is created. At least part of the questions tagged (stochastic-differential-equations) will need retagging by the new tag. Will somebody volunteer to do the manual retagging of older questions (or at least the more important ones)? Will other issues be address when retagging, too? (E.g., the missing top-level tags.) — Martin Sleziak 2 mins ago
 
7:49 AM
Another thing to keep in mind is that a question can have at most five tags.
So if every question about SPDEs would be tagged and , and at least one top-level-tag - that already takes three places.
I am not sure which top-level tags are best suite here - or or both.
 
8:33 AM
3
Q: Second order differentiability of subharmonic function almost everywhere?

studentThe following general definition of subharmonic function comes from the classical text book [elliptic partial differential equations of second order] by Gilbarg and Trudinger. We call a function $u$ subharmonic in $\Omega$ if $u \in C^0(\Omega)$ and for every ball $B \subset \subset \Omega$ and ...

2
A: Second order differentiability of subharmonic function almost everywhere?

Piotr HajlaszIn fact a weaker version of Aleksandrov's theorem is true for subharmonic functions. Since $\Delta u$ is a Radon measure, the following result follows from Proposition 4.4 in 1. Theorem. If $u:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}$ is subharmonic and locally integrable, then for almost all $x\in\Omega$ there exis...

One of the MO questions linked here is deleted at the moment. Of course, 10k+ users can still see it - for others, there is at least a snapshot in the Wayback Machine. — Martin Sleziak 43 secs ago
Hi @ThomasKojar - sorry for many comments on your post.
Probably I should stress that I am talking about a topic that I know nothing about.
But at least I have some familiarity with the way tags work on Stack Exchange site. (And, to some extent, on MO.)
Let's hope that some MO users will eventually chime in.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:18 AM
I do not think that would be actually a good idea - still I will at least mention this suggestion to have a "tag for Yitang Zhang results or Yitang Zhang theorem."
2
Q: Contribution of Yitang Zhang latest results if correct to correlation conjecture of H. L. Montgomery?

zeraoulia rafikThere are some integrals related to the celebrated pair correlation conjecture of H. L. Montgomery. One of them is the integral introduced by Selberg related to estimating the variance of primes in short intervals: I read the last interesting paper of Yitang Zhang and it seems to me that the pap...

> Note: I ask kindly community to add tag for Yitang Zhang results or Yitang Zhang theorem.
 

« first day (3367 days earlier)      last day (548 days later) »