The Blogging from 9 to 5 Room

This is a room dedicated to discussing the http://workplace.stackexchange.com blog
3968d ago – jmort253
249
7

export all events for this room

Starred posts

Jan 29, 2013 01:56
Sorry to be late to the table - I'm writing tonight and just starting (sigh). I was going to take "the interview process" as a good first step. My original thought was to do the view of the person looking for the job - since we get so, so many questions around that. But I like the idea of a 2 parter.
2
May 31, 2013 01:59
2
Q: Promoting the Workplace SE through community outreach to bloggers

jmort253There is still interest in hosting a community blog; however, we don't yet have enough content and writers to justify the Wordpress development for an actual Wordpress SE blog. I still think we could eventually have a blog, but there isn't quite enough interest just yet. So, here's an alternate...

May 12, 2013 16:04
Judging by our speed, I'm not 100% sure we have enough energy behind the blog yet to sustain it. I was actually going to suggest we try a different approach and see if @bethlakshmi and others wanted to publish what they have on their personal blogs. Seems wasteful to let good content sit.
Apr 16, 2013 09:27
Been a month since my last visit, thats what i get for being ill then on holiday i guess! how goes the blog everyone?
Jan 17, 2013 02:49
@jrg I also want to add that, if you aren't an expert on a subject, you could interview someone who is an expert and do an article on that. It would not only be a great learning experience, but it would also make for an interesting article that has more than just a single perspective.
Jan 10, 2013 20:26
Focusing on how much we care about maintaining good questions however is definitely something worth writing about though :-)
Jan 10, 2013 08:45
@jmort253 I like the idea of highlighting that question, but I would say the comments discussion around closing and opening it would be more worthwhile, as the reason it was a hit was off-topic (whilst the question core was, I believe, on-topic) and that might be considered a little insensitive given the subject matter