Conversation started Mar 18, 2019 at 12:26.
Mar 18, 2019 12:26
I mean.. What I get from his question... Is that why HCl is not as strong as it usually is in standalone aqueous form rather than when it is mixed with HF.. So here of course dissociation of HCl will go down due to (whatever small) dissociation of HF occurs... Common ion effect..
@Abcd He said that HCl is stronger than HF
@PolarBear No.. I think we meant that HCl becomes weaker in HF
Doubt @PolarBear @YUSUFHASAN
@YUSUFHASAN Oh, now I get it
Mar 18, 2019 12:27
@YUSUFHASAN I dont think Common ion effect is right explanation.
@Abcd I never understood this questions properly, though being a adv 2017 ques it had many solutions online. It was after looking at this ques I lost confidence in thermodynamics X
$\ce{H2O(l) (1 bar, \pu{373 K}) -> H2O(g)(1 bar, 373 K)}$
@Abcd I mean.. Common ion effect weakens the dissociation of both acids simultaneously,right? Simulataneous equilibrium and all that..?
Write $\text{signum}(\Delta G), \text{signum}(\Delta S)$ for this reaction:
1 min ago, by Abcd
$\ce{H2O(l) (1 bar, \pu{373 K}) -> H2O(g)(1 bar, 373 K)}$
@YUSUFHASAN @PolarBear @Dante This easier one as well pls^
@Dante Well, rest of the thermodynamics archive is very easy. Dont get disheartened by 1 or 2 questions.
@Abcd (Okay I don't know that answer but just trying on my getting answer by hook crook method is it (A)?)
Mar 18, 2019 12:31
H-bonding is there in HF... But it is quite weak in solution phase.. So i would say that common ion effect is good enough here
I see
@PolarBear Crkt
OP says HCl + HF <-> H2Cl+ + F-
(Whoo, lemme think then btw I found out the answer by dimensional analysis)
So it's not a typo
Mar 18, 2019 12:33
@PolarBear All answers are in bar!! How did you use Dimensional
@Abcd Calculation for that question is very easy, it's direct XD
It's just difficult to understand
@Abcd Not exactly.
Answer 2nd question you all.
@Abcd Where is the 2nd question?
@YUSUFHASAN See signum
@PolarBear I tried using : $\Delta G^o = -RT\ln(K_p)$
Mar 18, 2019 12:35
(deleted because you shouldn't do questions that way lol)
@Dante Proves my point.. Common ion effect is surely randomising stuff here.. Thats why that equilibrium exists
lol$^\infty$
@YUSUFHASAN I still think its because of low polarity of HF
@YUSUFHASAN Who is stronger Acetic or HF
Maybe you both could google for a confirmation?
I did but wasn;t satisfied
11
Q: Acidity of hydrochloric acid in acetic acid

NanoputianA question asked to find the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ of $\ce{HCl}$ in acetic acid. The equation of $\ce{HCl}$ disassociating in water is: $$\ce{HCl + CH3COOH \leftrightharpoons CH3COOH2+ + Cl-}$$ I predicted that the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ should be higher as acetic acid is a weaker base than wat...

Thats in acetic
So I opened my book and I have started abcd's question
I don't even remember solving thermo
Mar 18, 2019 12:36
Because of low polarity.
@PolarBear 2nd question first please!!
Thats 1 second question.
7 mins ago, by Abcd
Write $\text{signum}(\Delta G), \text{signum}(\Delta S)$ for this reaction:
7 mins ago, by Abcd
1 min ago, by Abcd
$\ce{H2O(l) (1 bar, \pu{373 K}) -> H2O(g)(1 bar, 373 K)}$
@AdvilSell Are you online
I meant starred* when I was little in class 11
Starred* not started*
(See that's what I did)
(Not really)
@Abcd delta S is Delta H/T
@PolarBear tell answers first
@PolarBear this is so hard!!
You didn't give delta H
@Abcd Not hard
I did it in seconds xD
@PolarBear question didnt give
dG is VdP that's the only info reqd
Mar 18, 2019 12:45
Is internal energy of solids dependent only on temp just like ideal gases?
@PolarBear But we have to derive it too right? Or did you learn this formula?
guess not...
Wait a minute.. Is some info missing?
@YUSUFHASAN Which ques?
@Abcd latent heat 40.8 we know
Mar 18, 2019 12:46
@Abcd U can derieve it via thermodyanmic sqaure.. dG=VdP-SdT
Guys signum just means give the signs.
I think that's what we will use
@Abcd The second one.. R u giving us the enthalpy?
@Abcd Oooh didn't know didn't notice either
@YUSUFHASAN C my latest message.
Mar 18, 2019 12:47
So you are talking about system or surrounding or whole?
Also sign(0) = 0
@PolarBear Question didnt say anything.
Oh.. So entropy change sign is.. Positive? For system?
Let's assume it to be system
@YUSUFHASAN Right And $\Delta G$?
@Abcd positive
@PolarBear wrong
Mar 18, 2019 12:49
Someone had linked a question on SE somewhere or I had just read it
@YUSUFHASAN wrong
It's reversible
Guys nothing is given in the question.
its IIT 2007 ques
17 lol
No 2007
Mar 18, 2019 12:50
no 17
@PolarBear 373 K is 100 C not room temp
@Abcd Is there anyway I can bookmark this conversation?
I would like to go through it after I finish thermo from NA
@Dante See my instructions to bookmark conversation in PSS to nobodyrecog.
We should have bookmarked the conversation on how to bookmark a conversation that would have made bookmarking easier
right
oh Ice has also given d instr.
Jun 27 '18 at 3:07, by Anonymous
@Abcd Go to this chat transcript, there is bookmark on right side of the desktop page. Click on it, then click on your 'start message' and then click on your 'end message'. The whole conversation from the start message to the end message will be bookmarked.
@YUSUFHASAN @PolarBear Why is $\Delta G = 0$ ???
Mar 18, 2019 12:53
It's zero. I said it.
Oh yes. I didn't see the temperature... And sincd they have given only the forward reaction.. So it will definitely be spontaneous at 100 degree celsius(facepalm, I am stupid)
@YUSUFHASAN For spon. $\Delta G = -ve$
It's zero. Zero. Yay. I'm right. I'm right.
It's equilibrium.
I am acting dumb today.
Ice give reason
16 secs ago, by PolarBear
It's equilibrium.
Mar 18, 2019 12:54
@PolarBear They have only given forward reaction in the question.. So u can't assume backward reaction here as far as I think
It seems like I have done all thermo questions.
@YUSUFHASAN No. You can.
That's what you have to think.
@Abcd Where's chat transcript?
It's an equilibrium we know that.
$\ce{P_(white, solid) -> P_(red, solid)}$
what is chat transcript?
Mar 18, 2019 12:55
@Dante Actually
click Room on LHS
Above your gravatar
@Abcd What to do?
@PolarBear Well.. Then delta G is zero.. So?
@PolarBear Is it phase transition or not?
@Abcd I am saying that since it is not given.. I don't know that whether they want us to consider the back reaction and take it as a phase change
@YUSUFHASAN ya exactly
@YUSUFHASAN Question 3 or 2?
Mar 18, 2019 12:58
@Abcd sign of delta G one
@YUSUFHASAN OK I agree with u on that
$\ce{P_{(white, solid)} -> P_{(red, solid)}}$
State if the above reaction is a Phase Transition or Not. @YUSUFHASAN
@Abcd Allotropes aren't phase transitions but we consider them sometimes
@PolarBear Say definite answer. yes or no.
Traditionally, no. But yes. I remember my teacher saying that.
Lol no but yes.
Say one thing.
What would u write .
Mar 18, 2019 13:00
Yes. I guess. There was an SE question on that too.
Yes you are right. But I dont understand how.
@Abcd In generality,yes it is a phase transition.. But it has two rate constants associated with it.. Suppose you want to talk about only one.. U make a question on that.. Then i will consider that reaction only
Those days when our teacher didn't teach us thermo and we had to learn ourselves. I learnt so much.
1
Q: Is Changing between Allotropic forms a Physical or Chemical Process?

NanoputianWhen a substance changes its alloptropic form, is this considered a physical change or a chemical change? Right now, I am thinking that it would depend on what the change was. For example, if graphite was changed to diamond under high pressure, I would say it is a chemical change since new bonds...

@YUSUFHASAN No this was a JEE question. Not mine.
See the answer.
@Abcd Maybe because I have seen it before so I subconsciously said that.
Mar 18, 2019 13:01
@PolarBear its talking about Chemical vs Physical process. Not phase trans as a term for allotrope connversion.
1 min ago, by PolarBear
See the answer.
Also, predict sign of $\Delta S$ (I was able to do this :D)
> The conversion of ferrite into austenite is a phase transition, so it should formally be classified as a physical change.
@Abcd allotropy will be considered a phase change cuz the two reactions(forward and backward) can enter such a state where their rates become equal.. That is...activation energh required becomes negligible... So u can take it at equilibrium
2
@PolarBear Standard state has zero enthalpy
not entropy.
I was being dumb
@YUSUFHASAN Nice
Mar 18, 2019 13:04
That is what answer states..And yes.. Entropy is only zero at zero Kelvin
@YUSUFHASAN Which answer r u referring to now??
I think this it is more like p block question
Yep.
Think and answer.
Sure?
Wrong!!!
Its less than 0.
Red is more ordered as it is polymeric
Never mind.. It was deleted.. And no.. Entropy change is ofcourse negative
White is haphazard
question was white to red ice
Mar 18, 2019 13:06
Oh, shit (':
I should study CS. Anymore questions?
Okay.. Seems @PolarBear didnt read the question
Isn't red more reactive ??
No
No.. Red is polymeric
due to angle starin
Mar 18, 2019 13:07
white is more reactive
@AdvilSell No
angle strain in white
Bro.. White has angle strain
@AdvilSell That's white
BTW reactivity is not the right explanation of Entropy!!
It has to do with degree of randomness.
 
Conversation ended Mar 18, 2019 at 13:07.