Conversation started Jan 16, 2017 at 16:18.
Jan 16, 2017 16:18
I HATE FONTS
@Pissedofflayman Aw
AAAAAAAAH
@BernardoMeurer wat
I had to vent
what did you see? what happened?
Jan 16, 2017 16:19
It's just such shit
The whole thing is horrible
I hate fonts
@BernardoMeurer webdings?
Comic sans?
I don't give a shit about how they look!
It's the system!
It's how they are handled everywhere
that drives me absolutely insane
I bet my ass fonts were invented by goddamn nazi-communist aliens
Jan 16, 2017 16:23
Hate
I
Hate
@BernardoMeurer Wait. "Drives you insane" ? Weren't you insane since time immemorial? :D
4
Fonts
@anonymous YES!
So imagine how bad it must be
@anonymous It just drives his insanity
Jan 16, 2017 16:23
𝓯𝓾𝓬𝓴 𝓯𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓼
$\mathcal{YEAH!}$
$stop \; the \; madness$
Oh god that's uglier than I thought...
@SirCumference ::throws up::
$\mathscr{MWAHAHA}$
Jan 16, 2017 16:25
I used \mathcal
$\mathbb{MWAHAHA}$
@AccidentalFourierTransform thanks
oh, gosh, that's hideous
$\Huge {THIS IS HUGE}$
$\mathfrak{THIS \; IS \; CRAZY}$
@Secret That's what she said
Jan 16, 2017 16:27
$$\Huge \color{blue}{G^o D} \ \color{red}{W_e} \ \color{purple}{a^r _e} \ \color{green}{b^o re^d}$$
::shivers::
Yeah, I knew that'd look horrible...
$\newcommand{\Huge}{\text{get rekd}}$
Best font ever lolololollo
👌
Jan 16, 2017 16:28
ֆȶօք քʟɛǟֆɛ
the agony
Huh, I think I broke the LaTeX on my post...
$$\Huge \color{blue}{G^o \ D} \ \color{red}{W_e} \ \color{purple}{a^r \ _e} \ \color{green}{b^o \ re^d}$$
@heather 👌
Yep, not working...
I broke it
with new command
Jan 16, 2017 16:29
@BernardoMeurer You bastard
(kidding)
I̢ ̙̦̗͚͉̥͜ḁ́m͎ ̷͕̣̤̼̳̞m̱̼̜͕͚͞el̯t̷i̢̻̦̮̦͙͙n͈g̗͕
T̗͇̤̙͔h͍͉̜͉̥̩̗e̻͈̼̣r̥̼͜e̷̼͓̮̮̻̹ ͉̹͍̘is͍̟͚͎̻̖ ͉͈̟̰͓̥t̬͍̱̮͘o̴̺̖o͔̭̱͉̠ͅ ̬ma̴̲̗̺̠̖n͇͔͢y̹ ̟f̙̜̹̞o̡̤̥̞ń̝̯͖t̗̖̹͍̮͟s̳̯
̵̠͈͙̻̞̼̪T̛̞̖͚̼͈̯̞o͈͖̦o͉̝̤̮̕ ̠̮̠͉̤̖͜m͇̤̬̜̗̙uc͔̤͔̫͚͞h̦͉̱ ͔́m̢̝̱̪̩̹ͅa̜͕̱̺͚̗̻͠d̯̠͙͓̻̲͢n͚̭̠͡e̪̲̣s̩͢s̡̮̳̰
͓̤͈͓Ge̢t̤̩̻͡ ͙̫̝̬̠̱i̤̟̦̳̞̙̲t̸͇ ̴̭̭͈̣a͓͇̬̥̫͙w̡̩̱̪a͈͎̺͎̤̮͔y̪͓͈͔̦͖
̯̬̥̳A̷̲̬͇g͚͓h̻̮̪͙͚ ̥͚͙̫I̞͉̰'̹̻̣̞ͅm͜ ̝d̤͈̕y҉̫̠̞̺̻i̻̼̟n͕̯͍̮g̨̼ ̷̠t͉̼͍͈̞h̵e ̨R̘É̥̻̞̻G͖E̵̪̯̹X̸͔͍̪ ̝̼͓͉ͅ
̭̲̮͖̤̟͟I̕t̲̤͈̝̦̭̰ ̲̺̣̻̯͞ͅi̸͖͉s̷͙͖̪̬͖ ̪̣͈͓̻̞ͅḫ̩̹̝̣͚o̼̥̗͘r̸͔̭͈̜r̸̪̣͔i̢̞̻̮̩b̹̺͜l͖͙e͡ ̗̼̣
2
(please don't flag that)
@heather Oye, zalgo
@SirCumference thought I'd bring that into the part
Actually I'm pretty sure I'm going to have to clear it off the star board any moment now
Jan 16, 2017 16:30
@DavidZ Clear what?
@DavidZ clear what off the star board?
The Zalgo
it's not starred...
It's not on the starboard
ok, nvm then...
Yes, hence the "going to"
anyway I don't actually care too much about Zalgo on the sidebar
Jan 16, 2017 16:32
oh, okay
oh, hey, it is starred =D
My broken LaTeX post is too :)
yup I starred it =P
Sigh, lemme test LaTeX
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT}$$
Yep, it works
$\newcommand{\frac}{\text{git rekd}}$
Refresh
Jan 16, 2017 16:34
@BernardoMeurer Yeah, nothing
Dammit
$\newcommand{\partial}{\text{get rekd}}$
I can't break it :(
Hmm, lemme *repost
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
oh god...
@BernardoMeurer Great, how long will that last for?
$\newcommand{\frac}{\frac}$
Until they are out of the recent history I think
Jan 16, 2017 16:37
$\newcommand{\partial}{\partial}$
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
Uh oh
You broke it badly now
wat
lol
This is amusing :-P
3
@DavidZ this is the best part of my day
(not that i'm really far into my day, but whatever)
Jan 16, 2017 16:40
\newcommand is OP
$\newcommand{\frac}{\Huge{GET REKD SON}}$
Could really screw up the math conversations here
$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$
Dude you broke it
Lovely...
@BernardoMeurer Whose smart idea was it to try newcommanding?
$\newcommand{\partial}{\Huge{GET REKD SON}}$
$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$
There we go
Jan 16, 2017 16:41
Oh god...that hurts the eyes
Beautiful
@SirCumference It was my idea :P
$\renewcommand{\partial}{\text{CHRIS WHITE COME BACK}}$
\newcommand{\partial}{\color{lightblue}{\text{get rekd}}$
Fduck
why are there just blank lines of text in this conversation?
$\partial$
3
UGH
Jan 16, 2017 16:43
@heather They are the new commands
$\newcommand{\partial}{\color{lightblue}{\text{get rekd}}$
dammit
Great...
$\newcommand{\partial}{\color{cyan}{\text{get rekd}}$
@SirCumference You guys check the starboard?
It's just a partial sign
@BernardoMeurer Do you and your "friend" use the same words like "GET REKD" ? :D chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/34797681#34797681 LOL XD
13 hours ago, by Kristina Levine
@KyleKanos Oh yeah, wait for the teenage years, you will git rekt.
$\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}$
Screw it
Jan 16, 2017 16:44
@anonymous We do actually
It's pretty common internet vocab
Fine, one last try
$\newcommand{\partial}{\color{{RGB}{0,255,255}}{\text{get rekd}}$
GODDAMMIT
this is pure hilarity
@SirCumference You haven't been blessed by the troll gods
Jan 16, 2017 16:47
$$\definecolor{test}{RGB}{114,0,172} \color{test}{test}$$
WTF
It doesn't even work
forget about the h bar(becue)
this needs to be the h bar and LaTeX breaker
screw it
Lemme paste something from online
$$ \definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}} $$
oh jesus
Anyone else see a ton of text extending past the page?
i do
my goodness, what did you do?
Jan 16, 2017 16:49
Well, lovely
You're breaking everything dude
stahp
I created some frankenstein monster...
If anyone from the TeX SE comes in here they will die instantly
3
yep =D
It will give them a stroke
Jan 16, 2017 16:50
I almost want to go over there and invite someone over
@heather Please
okay, gimme a moment =P
Sigh, lemme try something
$\newcommand{\partial}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
Now
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
OH JESUS
@SirCumference OH MY GOD STOP
2
typing this from my phone. My laptop exploded.
2
Jan 16, 2017 16:51
I didn't expect that
$$\partial\partial\partial$$
God my computer is lagging like hell
i click out of the page for one moment
and oh my gosh
what is happening
dirac is rolling over in his grave
Jan 16, 2017 16:52
WHAT IS THIS
My CPU usage is up
and so's every other physicists who knows what hbar is
@BernardoMeurer lol
if my computer crashes, you all know why
Damn, \newcommand can really break the chat...
That's kind of scary
@SirCumference, no kidding, lol
let's break it again
Someone spamming it enough and nesting it can make the chat unusable for everyone else...
What if we newcommand newcommand?
Jan 16, 2017 16:53
look what you did, you happy?
2
@SirCumference Just turn chatjax off?
and we already established that you don't need to earn any rep to talk in chat...
@AccidentalFourierTransform you're kidding, right?
@BernardoMeurer Yeah, but people with chatjax++ have more trouble
$\newcommand{break the world}$
^this needs to be a thing
I'm disappointed in LaTeX
$\breaktheworld$
nope, that doesn't work either.
$\newcommand{default}$
Jan 16, 2017 16:55
You want \newcommand\breaktheworld{\renewcommand\frac[2]{whatever}}
$\newcommand{\breaktheworld}{\Huge{BREAK THE WORLD}}$
$\newcommand\breaktheworld{\renewcommand\frac[2]{whatever}}$
$\breaktheworld$
$\breaktheworld$
Jesus christ what are you all doing?
Jan 16, 2017 16:56
ack, it didn't work
Or I guess \newcommand\breaktheworld{\renewcommand\newcommand{whatever}} maybe is what you meant
$\newcommand\breaktheworld{\renewcommand\newcommand{whatever}}$
$\breaktheworld$
oo c***
$\newcommand{\partial}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
::smacks SirCumference::
Jan 16, 2017 16:57
Mother of god
blocking the starboard, for shame.
You guys screwed up not only the h bar, but all the LaTeX here
7
Q: Less than or equal comparison within a whiledo

Peter GrillI am in the process of cleaning up the code for Sieve of Eratosthenes in tikz, but saw that when I initially did the code, I could not figure out how to do a <= comparison within the \whiledo, and had resorted to doing a < comparison with one more than the desired number. This feels like a hack ...

ALL the LaTeX? @SirCumference
let us code someting with while-do
Jan 16, 2017 16:58
Dear lord, what is going on in this chatroom?
9
@heather Well, from here on out
New command no longer works
rotfl
@ACuriousMind Hell, ACM
@ACuriousMind Er
@ACuriousMind People are trying to break MathJax
Jan 16, 2017 16:58
@ACuriousMind madness =D
I guess
@DavidZ Exactly
WHAT IF
@BernardoMeurer Nah, we don't have ***JaX on so we just see the code ;-)
i'm laughing so hard i'm crying right now
@ACuriousMind see what happens when you leave for more than five minutes?
Jan 16, 2017 16:59
We do ackermann in Charjax
@JosephWright Hello there :P
The pictures on the left of the messages are moving out of the browser window, what the hell
Hi @DavidCarlisle
@BernardoMeurer do it
Because you can hack the chat room doesn't mean you should hack the chat room. A room owner speaks (while trying not to giggle).
4
Jan 16, 2017 16:59
@BernardoMeurer Hello
WHO CALLED THE TEX PEOPLE?
They are going to die
@BernardoMeurer, at your request, me.
@JosephWright huh what brings you to our corner?
I need them for my essays next semester
whats happening!?!?!
Jan 16, 2017 17:00
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah
@AccidentalFourierTransform just popped in to see if I could make sense of a conversation that had drifted into the tex.stackexchange chat:-)
y'all want to do this sort of unholy hacking, do it on the tex.se chatroom
@DavidZ There was a mention in the TeX-sx chatroom that something interesting was going on
@JohnRennie Not so much hacking as rendering it unusable (at least for people with ChatJax++)
oh god Im so happy am a part of this
Jan 16, 2017 17:00
(like myself)
@AccidentalFourierTransform yep =D
Ohh right... I forgot to rejoin that room
@JosephWright @DavidCarlisle We are working on breaking chatjax
We want help
All thanks to @BernardoMeurer for introducing everyone to \newcommand
Jan 16, 2017 17:01
Congrats, you broke the world
@BernardoMeurer, please do try Ackermann
@AccidentalFourierTransform I was busy writing this answer so I didn't keep track on what's going on here and now...this, whatever this is
bernard is not the first guy who introduce newcommand to this chat. It is danielsank who first done that 1 years ago according to chat logs
@BernardoMeurer To be fair, MathJax is a fairly "crippled" version of (La)TeX. You can't break it too badly.
@ACuriousMind who cares about Hamiltonians? were making history here
Jan 16, 2017 17:02
@DavidZ I HEAR A CHALLENGE
4
people will reference the mathjaxx apocalypse for centuries
I, for one, just deactivated MathJax for the time being :P
@DavidZ Look what you've done
@DanielSank LET'S BREAK IT
What's going on in here?
Jan 16, 2017 17:03
$\mathbb{SO}\; \mathbf{LET}\;\mathbb{US}\; \mathbf{CONTINUE}$
2
and break chatjax
@DanielSank madness, wonderful madness
@ACuriousMind Er, it still works
@DanielSank your \newcommand result in h bar being broken, lol
$\renewcommand{\mathbb}{\text{\Huge BREAK IT}}$
Et tu, @heather?
@BernardoMeurer Oh god
Jan 16, 2017 17:03
I'm letting this happen on the assumption that people get bored of it soon enough
anyone knows how to code a while-do with mathjax?
@DanielSank yep
@DavidZ so naive
a simple while(1) \partial should do the trick
@SirCumference wat? I meant I just deactivated my MathJax rendering bookmarklet thingy.
Jan 16, 2017 17:04
We need to somehow make ackermann in chatjax
$\newcommand{\partial}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
Hmm
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
oooooh, look at this
Some smart guy...
Jan 16, 2017 17:05
Watching this all with chatjax off is amusing.
3
@SirCumference, what this time?
Someone destroyed \newcommand
@SirCumference, uh...you?
@SirCumference Dammit
@heather Nope
Jan 16, 2017 17:05
Okay folks
what happened?
I will kill the fun
@BernardoMeurer Probably because someone did \newcommand on \newcommand
$\renewcommand{\newcommand}{\text{GOODBYE}}$
@AccidentalFourierTransform You suck... XD
Jan 16, 2017 17:06
@BernardoMeurer lolol
$
MathJax.Hub.Config({
TeX: {
Macros: {
RR: '{\\bf R}',
bold: ['{\\bf #1}', 1]
}
}
});$
oh, wait
what am I doing?
Sigh. $\newcommand{\text}{\text{test}}$
PEACE HAS BEEN RESTORED
(in part)
@heather ahahahaga
@BernardoMeurer, has it?
Jan 16, 2017 17:07
@BernardoMeurer You monster
what has happened
$\newcommand{\newcommand}{\text{quit trolling}}$
LOOK
I broke it badly
OH
I KNOW HOW TO BREAK IT
$\renewcommand{\newcommand}{\text{no}}$
@BernardoMeurer DO IT!
I need to get my laptop so I can see what thus looks like with chatjax on.
Jan 16, 2017 17:08
WE can make a newcommand/renewcommand Loop!
@BernardoMeurer Oh god
@DanielSank try not to die!
Stop
$\newcommand{what}$
@BernardoMeurer YES!!
$how\,should\,we\,do\,this$
Jan 16, 2017 17:09
$\renewcommand{\rho}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
If we newcommand renewcommand to being newcommand and then newcommand is already renewcommand to renewcommand
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
Goddammit
@heather RIP my laptop
it should brainfuck mathjax
Jan 16, 2017 17:09
@BernardoMeurer okay
$\rho$
@AccidentalFourierTransform Someone broke it
$\mu$
$\partial$
Jan 16, 2017 17:09
@AccidentalFourierTransform Nah, \newcommand is broken
$\renewcommand{\mu}{\text{STAHP}}$
you broke partial, too
$\renewcommand{\partial}{\text{STAHP}}$
i'm literally waiting for my computer to crash
Jan 16, 2017 17:10
$$\renewcommand{\partial}{\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT}}$$
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
@SirCumference Uh oh
@DavidZ I have calculated the cross section for Heather and Bernardo to create a black hole in the Stack Exchange servers with what they're doing. In the name of science I ask that they be allowed to proceed.
@SirCumference Oh wow
@SirCumference YOU BROKE IT
@DanielSank You'll notice I haven't stopped this the whole time I've been sitting here ;-)
.
.

.























































































































































































































.
SUCCESS!
@Secret wtf
Jan 16, 2017 17:11
@Secret Is on a whole other level
who made mathjax do the little gray box at lower right?
this thing is properly broken now
$\def\x{\x} \x$
@Secret what did you do?
Well, gotta go
$\newcommand\def\x{\x} \x$
@Secret Did you divide by 0?
2
Jan 16, 2017 17:12
@heather He put a period at the end of all that
Don't forget, lovecraftian creature like to inject a lot of insanity on me
@SirCumference see you around
If only we could do loops here
okay, wait, I've got it
read under the last two headings
It's broken, chatjax keeps reloading endlessly
Jan 16, 2017 17:14
$\x$
$MathJax.Hub.Config({
TeX: {
MAXBUFFER: 10000*10^24
}
}
});$
$\def\x{\x aaa} \x$
ack
MathJax.Hub.Config(please work again);
@heather That's Javascript
It doesn't work in chat
@AccidentalFourierTransform lol
@DavidZ darn it, foiled again
Jan 16, 2017 17:16
mthjax really need a "go back to defaults" command
@Secret F5
@Secret just reload the script
And the page
can we just delete this chatroom and get a fresh start
 
Conversation ended Jan 16, 2017 at 17:17.