hi all/heather thx so much for participating! 1hr chat session with heather as special guest. more info here. meta.physics.stackexchange.com/questions/9613/… DS volunteered to moderate. plz stay tuned for future sessions/ guests too. :)
Heather is a physics student who began using this site last year. In a short time, she has become one of the main participants in chat and has answered several good questions.
heather, there were a lot of questions on the meta about your physics studies.
Well, my Dad is very interested in physics himself, so there's always been physics books around the house. But I really started getting heavily interested in the sciences starting in middle school, when I started to learn more complex math and could start understanding books about physics.
I really kicked into gear in studying physics the beginning of last year, though.
@JuanM Oh, gosh. Many different ones. Currently, quantum computing is at the top of my list, and because of my dad, nuclear fusion and plasma physics are also on the list. However, just in general, I love reading about physics, mathematics, and computer science.
@DanielSank, I don't think I have a mastery of anything - in fact (and this is dodging the question a bit) I don't think anyone really has a mastery of anything. To more directly answer the question, no, I don't - I dabble and skip around more than I should, which actually leads me to a deeper understanding, I think.
heather how did you hear about stackexchange? what were your initial impressions? fyi youve gained a lot of points on the site in a short amt of time, congrats on that!
As I come back to things, I notice things I haven't before, and make new connections, which helps me learn.
@vzn Thanks. Interestingly enough, my dad happened upon stack exchange, and I originally joined mathematica stack exchange, because that's what he joined. Then I found physics and I loved it! It was the summer, and during the summer I started to really start self learning, so it came at the right time.
One semi-negative impression I had, though, was confusion over what things were closed for, especially with regards to the homework policy.
@heather yes you seem to be highly motivated wrt self learning which is not common although theres a lot of commitment to that by many in this chat room which is inspiring to see at times. are any of your friends interested in some of these same STEM subjs you are? both girls/ boys? or do you find yourself different than your peers?
@DanielSank So, there's two parts to that. Currently, I'm in geometry, which as far as I know is technically a sophomore year highschool class. However, I'm not the only 8th grader in that class (in fact, there's quite a few in that accelerated track). With regards to my own studies, I've read about single-variable calculus, which I have a semi-decent understanding of, set theory, linear algebra, and dabbled in other areas.
@vzn Yeah, I've got a good number of friends also interested in STEM subjects like myself, both boys and girls, though a few have turned to the dark side and befriended biology =)
@heather are you satisified with the classes available to you, are they challenging, do you wish they were different somehow? next year 9th grade youre going to new school? have you started looking into next years classes, any reaction?
@JuanM Oh, so many. I like the Theoretical Minimum by Leonard Susskind, Apostol's Calculus, Halmos' Naive Set Theory, Chuang and Nielsen's Quantum Computing and Quantum Information (I'm going to stop here, I have a large bookshelf)
@vzn well. I could always hope for more science classes, for sure. In 10th grade, stuff gets super interesting, because that's when it switches over to block scheduling in my district (don't ask about 9th grade, the way the do it is funky) and I can take Chemistry I and AP Chem, AP Physics I and II, Precalc, AP Prob and Stats, so on and so forth. So I'm really excited for that.
@JuanM 10 years - oh, geesh, I'd be 24-25. That's almost scary to think about. So, I'd probably want to be researching physics, or be some sort of engineer, or getting a PhD if I need it in my field (I dunno how long these things take). I can't really give you a great answer here, because I'm still not completely sure exactly where I want to go. I just know I want to do something with math, physics, and programming.
@vzn oh, and I also get to take dual-credit college courses senior year from a community college nearby (the way I think I'll set it up, I'll be maxing out on the math courses offered at the highschool junior year).
@ThomasKlimpel Not really. Last year we got to do a few things such as dissecting a chicken wing, but there we only had to identify a tendon, a ligament, etcetera. But there aren't nearly as many labs as I personally think there should be for a science class.
@anonymous Not rigorously, no, but I have worked on some problems from it.
@DanielSank Okay. Well, if I'm going to dream, break-even fusion would be an absolutely amazing thing to achieve.
helping solve the energy crisis and all that. But I think that's the sort of thing that will be solved incrementally, in bits and pieces, not in one giant leap (though it could be, you never know).
This leads into another question from meta: have you ever solved a real-life physics problem? In other words, have you used physics to solve a problem that came to you through life and not necessarily from a book?
Time number one, I was helping my dad with soldering, and he helped me use Ohm's Law to figure out what resistor we needed.
@DanielSank sorry, slow at typing.
I'm also working a bit on a program that simulates various ideal quantum circuits, which requires understanding the math and physics behind quantum gates.
I note your interest in quantum computing. I work in IT, and I've taken careful note of the way digital electronic or "ordinary" computing has advanced in leaps and bounds over recent decades. Advances in computing has changed our lives, for the better. In that time I've seen a lot of very positi...
"How long will you retain your interest in quantum computing if it delivers diddly-squat?"
is the first part, and I'd say, it hasn't delivered diddly-squat. In fact, I'd say it's delivered a whole lot. Shor's algorithm, Grover's algorithm, many other algorithms, working qubits, and much much more - it's amazing we've come this far, and research is only increasing! I can't imagine quantum computing will end up delivering diddly-squat. In fact, I can't even see where that question is coming from.
Well, we haven't produced anything more useful than a silicon PC though... right?
I think his point was that while there's been progress, we haven't actually produced anything to the benefit of man kind (not that I agree with that statement).
@0celo7 as far as I'm aware, not yet, but the fact that we've come up with algorithms that will help break current cryptography - that seems like it could lead to some economic value.
@DanielSank Physics itself, and just the idea of exploring what's out there, benefits human kind, just as Beethoven or Mozart benefits humankind, in my opinion.
@0celo7 True. But what about simulating quantum mechanical systems? That could help with research that may have industrial applications.
@heather yeah really wanna hear the details about your visit to DSs/ martinis lab (santa barbara/ google), ideally maybe you could even write a blog about it, & say put it on DSs blog. :)
:35565288 I think there's a limit, so no, I'm not sure I would. But also, currently quantum computing is also funded by private researchers, so I'm not quite sure that's a fair comparison.
@0celo7 speaking as a non-expert, I don't want to say anything stupid/idiotic, so I'll decline on answering that. =)
Do you know Scott Aaronson, and what he hopes to get from quantum computing? Do you think google is pursuing quantum supremacy for the same reasons as Scott, or just to have some achievable milestone?
@vzn It's kind of a funny story, actually. Khan Academy does this thing called the Breakthrough Junior Challenge, and I found out about it (it's basically where kids make a video about math/science and submit it in a contest) and thought it would be fun. I was trying to think of a topic and my dad said something along the lines of "I heard of this thing called quantum computing...why don't you google that?"
2
@0celo7 I don't know. Maybe not? It depends, really.
@0celo7 qm computing ultimate viability/ practicality an open question of the field & there is an active debate in this other room, feel free to join/ add anytime chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13775/physics-meta
However, I think google's reasons go beyond just having an achievable milestone. As a company, they obviously would like to make money from it, and I think quantum computing has multiple avenues where that is possible or even probable.
@0celo7 The idea of quantum computing being a hoax I don't believe really makes sense at this stage.
The only way I can see it being a hoax is if the CIA already actually has a quantum computer and they're funding academic and private contractors to throw everyone off the trail :-P
@0celo7, well if I didn't do quantum computing, I'd probably head into plasma/particle/nuclear physics, engineering, computer science - see the thing is, I don't know if quantum computing is my path as it is, so I have plenty of aspirations. Aerospace engineering and electrical engineering also interests me.
@0celo7 well. I don't wear glasses with the tape on them, but I do wear glasses. I don't wear that short plaid mini-skirt thing with suspenders like the sterotype seems to be, and I don't generally wear a shirt with a pocket to keep a calculator/pencils in (everyone knows you keep those in your jeans pocket). Seriously, though, i do dress rather sloppily, I have a few quirks/etc, and I carry around nerdy books, so you could probably peg me as a nerd pretty quickly =)
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah, I was born in a dilution refrigerator, it was rough =P (Kidding, obviously)
@DanielSank Sure. I started rock climbing maybe...four and a half years ago? I'm on a climbing team, so we train together and go around and do competitions. I really enjoy it - it's a sport that challenges both the body and the mind.
@heather Do you believe in specializing in a particular sub-field of a subject (like QC) or do you feel that dabbling in various sub-fields helps one gain more experience ? Like you know they won't teach you QC atleast in the first 4 years of college. Would you have liked a QC course in your undergrad? Or would you be happy learning various other (maybe even unrealted) topics instead of QC ?
We're just about done. Thank you everyone for the questions. Obviously, the chat will not implode into a black hole at the official end time of the AMA, so please stay here and keep chatting as long as heather is willing to answer.
@anonymous oh, I'd be happy learning just about anything related to physics! I think dabbling in different fields definitely helps one gain more experience. I also think it isn't good to completely isolate yourself from other topics; I just don't think that's completely healthy.
@DanielSank, I appreciate you taking the time to moderate, whether or not you moderate from here on out is up to you, of course =)
@0celo7 Uhm...tennis shoes/sneakers for every day wear (though I do have a pair of knock-off converses that I like the design of) and climbing shoes for when I want to undergo pain and suffering. I think that goes on my strange question of the day list.
@Danu The condition $\nabla R=0$ (covariantly constant curvature tensor) is equivalent to: parallel translation of nondegenerate plane sections does not change sectional curvature.
@heather One thing I really wanted to know is how your daily hours are distributed between homework/family/personal projects (physics reading)/sports/everything else.
And, importantly, are you satisfied with this distribution?
ah, yes, good question. a lot of my time is obviously taken up by school (basically from when I wake up (minus time to get ready, obviously) to 3:20 ish when I get home.
three nights a week i have climbing team, and two of those days are weeknights - one of the weeknights from 6-9 (pm) one from 7-9 (pm) and the weekend day 7-9 (pm).
@DanielSank I dislike school as well. I really only like it as a social outlet.
then for family time, sometimes my dad and i will spend mornings working on projects, or my mom will take me out to get a new pair of jeans or just to chill together (same on the latter with my dad). We eat meals together a decent amount. so I'd say the remaining time is decently well split between family and personal time (and sometimes the two overlap).
so changing the various times - I'd basically bring school down to zero until I can take cool classes starting in 12th grade (though I guess I'd keep my math classes). and I'd add in social time with friends. I'd spend the balance of extra time on my personal projects and family.
@heather Which one would you prefer? Would you like to be a research/theoritical scientist (like Stephen Hawking) or something like an entrepreneur cum scientist (like Elon Musk) ? Do you have any interest in being an entrepreneur ?
I think I spend a decent amount of time on exercise and wouldn't change that.
@anonymous some interest in being an entrepreneur, i suppose, though I think that's lessened. when I was younger, I had a baking "business" and i'd literally bake cookies and brownies and sell them. i did pretty well. i don't really do it anymore because school, basically, and i don't have as much interest in baking anymore. but really, I think i love science and experimental science just for itself, and I don't know if I'd want to make it a company. obviously, that could change.
in response to the second most upvoted question, "Do your parents know that you are internet-friends with people from all around the world, most of which are at least twice your age? What do they think about that?"
yes, they know, and they think it's cool I know these people who are nerdy like me and can get help from them.
in response to your question @DanielSank about the relation between rock climbing and the mind, I think it's a positive one - I always feel tired but at the same time energized after climbing, and I definitely feel a lot better doing it than I think I would without.