Conversation started Jul 14, 2016 at 13:54.
Jul 14, 2016 13:54
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan I may be able to help :D
wait @arda, there's Pokemon GO to Windows Phone?
@ToshinouKyouko the japanese have already mastered that
I use Android now
:D
same, i switched recently
@Hippalectryon do you know how inertial forces appear?
Jul 14, 2016 13:55
just in time for PoGo :)
like, I'm with problems when talking about a corpse without friction in a rotating disk (centrifugal force)
@arda D:
I'm all alone now
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan yeah I know that stuff
Not sure about the video's method though - is it important ?
not at all
I'm looking for a way to ~be~ the observator
I saw that you'd simply do some line integrals in Wikipedia
But I did not get the idea
Yay physics
Jul 14, 2016 13:59
@Taisho what
https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=http://googledrive.com/host/0B9du34AejghtVkpSaDVKQ1BqWnc/5d6776d77615fe616df0a5ee2545425c_thumb.png | http://tineye.com/search?url=http://googledrive.com/host/0B9du34AejghtVkpSaDVKQ1BqWnc/5d6776d77615fe616df0a5ee2545425c_thumb.png | http://saucenao.com/search.php?url=http://googledrive.com/host/0B9du34AejghtVkpSaDVKQ1BqWnc/5d6776d77615fe616df0a5ee2545425c_thumb.png | http://iqdb.org/?url=http://googledrive.com/host/0B9du34AejghtVkpSaDVKQ1BqWnc/5d6776d77615fe616df0a5ee2545425c_thumb.png
@arda irony? D:
Not sure what you mean by "being" the observator, can you be more specific ? Maybe we didn't learn the notions the same way @Chinatsu-creepy-chan
@Taisho makes me think of Homicide Jack
or was it Genocide Jack
@Hippalectryon the observator accelerates/moves in time
So all the space "moves" for him
holy f*
A rotating frame of reference is a special case of a non-inertial reference frame that is rotating relative to an inertial reference frame. An everyday example of a rotating reference frame is the surface of the Earth. (This article considers only frames rotating about a fixed axis. For more general rotations, see Euler angles.) == Fictitious forces == All non-inertial reference frames exhibit fictitious forces. Rotating reference frames are characterized by three fictitious forces: the centrifugal force, the Coriolis force, and, for non-uniformly rotating reference frames, the Euler for...
Jul 14, 2016 14:03
Oh so you have a galilean frame, and then around him you have another frame which is the operator's frame, a priori non galilean and thus subject to inertial forces in the observator's referential ?
(galilean frame = inertial frame for me)
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan nah I love physics
Wow that's a weird way to put it up but
meh IDK
I don't have a teacher to teach me these things so I'm all confused
If the observator "moves", it has to be relative to a special frame, not his. The observator is immobile in his own frame
Well anyway, I'm not sure I grasp what your question is exactly
Oh yeah, I got you
7 mins ago, by Chinatsu-creepy-chan
I'm looking for a way to ~be~ the observator
Jul 14, 2016 14:06
0
Q: Can a transformed saiyan lower his ki to base-human level when transformed?

PabloIn Dragon Ball Resurrection of Freezer , Goku when transformed in Super Saiyan God Super Saiyan is almost killed by a laser beam from Sorbet . Now how could this happen? Was his ki so low even when he was a SSGSS? Later in the Dragon Ball Super series this seems to be corrected because he isnt tr...

The observator moves relative to the inertial frame of reference
Indeed. What's preventing you from "being" the observator ?
@Hippalectryon eeeh, IDK
That's what I thought:
The observator moves with an s (space) equation so the world has to move, to him, with an s^-1 equation (inverse function)
I want a really sad anime
Is EVA good 'n sad?
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan That's true
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan You've already watched 5cm/s ?
Jul 14, 2016 14:24
@Hippalectryon nope. It's a move isn't it?
A movie in three parts
There's also Haibane Renmei which I haven't watched yet (PTW) but looked primising
@Hippalectryon centrifugal force will only appear in a punctual corpse if there's friction, right?
@Hippalectryon noice
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan Oh no it's totally unrelated
But the motion is parallel to the corpse..
When moving around an axis, you'll undergo a centrifugal force wether there is friction or not
How can the motion be parallel to the corpse if the corpse is punctual ?
Jul 14, 2016 14:34
KEK
I'm stupid LOL
But how would it even move?
A punctual body over a rotating 2d circumference
Electromagnetic forces for instance ?
Think of a charge in a magnetic field perpendicular to its initial speed
(well then the rotating thing doesn't play any role uh)
If it moves because of the rotating circumference then yeah you'll need friction (unless you use some induction shenanigans for instance)
But you don't need a rotating plate to induce a circular movement
Jul 14, 2016 14:49
@Hippalectryon IKR, the body can move by itself
that was one of the main questions I had
If there's a guy with ultra-slippery shoes in a rotating circumference, then he would just stay in the same place right?
Yep
Well he'd fall but that's another story :P
Ok, I got that. Yay :D
So, can you give me an example of centrifugal force plz? I can't imagine one without friction (the corpse would just move by itself in regular motion so he wouldn't be thrown out because of inertia)
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan Well for an easy example : take the earth orbiting around the sun. In the sun's (quasi inertial) reference frame, the earth is subject to the gravitational force. In the earth's reference frame, the only 'newtonian' force the earth is subject to is a gravitational force from the sun, and thus it should move, which is absurd (the earth is immobile in its own reference frame).
Hopefully since the earth's reference frame is not inertial, there exists a centrifugal force to counter the effect of the gravitational force.
@Hippalectryon I don't get this at all..
What should move? The Earth? The Sun?
Oh. The Sun should move... heh
Ah no the sun is immobile in this case (take it has having a huuuuuge mass)
Ok so let's look at the second part of what I said.
We're studying the earth's movement it its own reference frame, in circular translation around the sun
Jul 14, 2016 15:00
@Hippalectryon I mean, the sun "moves" in relation to the earth.
What does Newton's 2nd law tell us about the Earth's movement in its own referential ?
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan ah yes
@Hippalectryon 2nd law? F = ma?
Yep. What's F a more explicit way ?
Interaction
@Gao ouch...
Well it's the sum of all the forces exerced on the Earth right ? (assuming it's a pointmass)
Jul 14, 2016 15:12
@Hippalectryon yup
Ok. What are the forces in this special case ?
Eh... Gravitational and, like, internal forces that we won't consider? u_u
Ok. So we have a=F_grav/m right ?
So a=/=0 ? But aren't we in the earth's own frame ? How is that possible ?
Jul 14, 2016 15:16
@Hippalectryon I don't get this.
You mean, earth "shouldn't" be moving?
Earth is moving, say, in respect to the sun's center. But earth isn't moving with respect to its own center is it ?
In Earth's reference frame, Earth is always in the center of the frame, with coordinates (0,0,0)
Oooooooh.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
So, where's the catch ? :D Why is the acceleration nonzero in the Earth's reference frame ?
@Hippalectryon Fictious force?
When is Newton's second law valid ? What are the conditions ?
Jul 14, 2016 15:28
tbh, IDK
Newton's second law is only valid in intertial frames
And the earth's frame isn't an inertial frame since it's rotating around the sun's frame, which is supposed to be inertial
For all non-inertial frames, for Newton's second law to be valid you need to add the inertial forces in ma=F => ma=F+F_inertial
AAAAAH
I'M SO DUMB
It's so obvious, like
a moving train with speed v and a guy running with speed -v: he'd just be in the same position
Thank yooou <3<3<3
And if you actually write the formula for the inertial force, you'll realize that it's the exact opposite of the gravitational force
:-)
@Hippalectryon What is its formula?
It was going to be my next question :P
Jul 14, 2016 15:36
Do you know the formula for the centrifugal force for an object rotating around an axis ?
yup, mv²/r (non accelerated motion)
Yep. Now any way to express v in function of G,mass_sun ? (G is the constant that appears in the gravitational force)
Since F = GMm/r² and g = GM/r²
$v = \int \frac{GM}{s^2}\, \mathrm{dt}$
(use chatjax)
Well that's not false but it's not very useful
Do you know that the acceleration of an object rotating at a constant speed $v$ and radius $r$ is $a=v^2/r$ oriented towards the center ?
(in the center's inertial frame)
Jul 14, 2016 15:54
0
Q: Translation of anime soundtrack lyrics

animeFunThese are the lyrics of a Japanese song (OST from 'Katanagatari' anime series). I understand that it is about killings and revenge from google translate, but the translation is not accurate and not at all helpfull. たがぬこえ ひびぬこえ たがぬなき ひびぬなき たがごとに みたまうち あがつみに さばかれん あらさかの かみのおの いのちなむ ほのをたつ ま...

Jul 14, 2016 16:20
@Hippalectryon Yeah
(my bad, just had lunch)
Alright so if we look at the Earth's movement in the sun's inertial frame, what relation does Newton's second law give us between $v$ and $G,r,M_{sun}$ ?
@Hippalectryon I don't get this...
@Chinatsu-creepy-chan Write Newton's second law for the earth in the sun's frame. Since the sun's frame us by hypothesis inertial, the only force to consider here is the gravitational force.
Jul 14, 2016 16:54
Ok...
F = ma = GM/r²
now substitute $a$ by
1 hour ago, by Chinatsu-creepy-chan
yup, mv²/r (non accelerated motion)
mv²/r = GM/r² -> v = root(GMr/m)
m isn't squared
finally express $v$ in function of $M,G,r$ and compare the gravitational force and the inertial force
oh, you're right
 
Conversation ended Jul 14, 2016 at 16:57.