Conversation started Jan 31, 2012 at 22:41.
Jan 31, 2012 22:41
@Dylan: can you please take a look at this and this? And hi!
I guess you should also check at the boundary. The behavior there might change. But that's two points.
@Srivatsan I was going to suggest category-theory but Asaf explicitly disallows that.
Hi guys, also.
any algebra related tags?
Certainly one first sees this construction in commutative algebra. So that and abstract-algebra aren't out of place.
How about ? I don't know anything about it either, but Arturo's answer is based on this.
That, I know nothing about.
Jan 31, 2012 22:46
@DylanMoreland Actually, I first saw it in general topology!
It seems like Arturo mentions this.
@BrianMScott Ah! That's interesting.
@Srivatsan I mean, now that he's gotten some good answers I don't see the harm in putting category-theory on it. It seems like the most natural thing.
yeah, makes sense.
Sorry I'm not much help.
If I were asking, I would probably place category-theory and commutative-algebra on it. But that's just an opinion.
Actually, you were. I will just ask a few others and retag later.
@Brian: any suggestions?
Nothing that hasn’t been mentioned.
Jan 31, 2012 22:50
Hmpf. I'm still not completely drunk.
@BrianMScott Ok. And how about the three tags mentioned? universal-algebra, category-theory and commutative-algebra.
@Srivatsan They seem okay. The problem is that it’s a very general construction that comes up all over.
I am mildly unsober.
Ah. That is an argument against commutative-algebra, I suppose.
Thanks, Dylan and Brian.
Thanks for being vigilant on tags.
 
Conversation ended Jan 31, 2012 at 22:53.