Conversation started Jul 13, 2015 at 21:51.
Jul 13, 2015 21:51
The B-theory of time is the name given to one of two positions regarding philosophy of time. B-theorists argue that the flow of time is an illusion, that the past, present and future are equally real, and that time is tenseless. This would mean that temporal becoming is not an objective feature of reality. B-theory is often drawn upon in theoretical physics, and in theories such as eternalism. == Origin == The labels, A-theory and B-theory, are derived from the analysis of time and change developed by Cambridge philosopher J. M. E. McTaggart in "The Unreality of Time" (1908), in which events are...
A nominal or tenseless sentence consists of two different types: (1) a sentence with a copular auxiliary and a predicative expression For example: “Mary is a student” which includes the copula "to be" and the predicate "a student"Or (2) a sentence without a finite verb. For example: “Ladies and gentlemen, my dear brother, Tom” where the verb "to be" is missing, as opposed to “Ladies and gentlemen, this is my dear brother, Tom”. The following entry will expand on definition (2), specifically what allows them to omit finite verbs yet still be grammatical, to the point where a whole discourse can...
> The number of tenses in English is an issue that has no easy answer, I'm afraid. There are many, including Dave Willis, the author of our grammar reference, who argue that there are only two tenses in English, though it's true that we often speak of 12. In neither case is 'used + infinitive' included as an independent tense. We concentrate on helping people learn English here so I can't go into great detail on this, but you might find the wikipedia entry on modal auxiliary verbs useful. I'd also recommend you take a look at TeachingEnglish, where there is also a forum in which you can ask
The modal verbs of English are a small class of auxiliary verbs used mostly to express modality (properties such as possibility, obligation, etc.). They can be distinguished from other verbs by their defectiveness (they do not have participle or infinitive forms) and by the fact that they do not take the ending -(e)s in the third-person singular. The principal English modal verbs are can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will and would. Certain other verbs are sometimes, but not always, classed as modals; these include ought, had better, and (in certain uses) dare and need. Verbs which share...
> Modal verbs do not change in form to make different tenses.
All of the modal verbs can refer to present and future time. Only some of them can refer to past time.
> It is of utmost importance that you understand that the 'tenses' shown in the table are not correlated to the time of the action in statements.
> While English modal verbs have only two tenses -- past and present (can, could - like, liked - have to, had to, etc.) -- German modal verbs have a full range of tenses and moods. This can sometime create confusion for English-speakers, because in English the past tense is sometimes used to relate a conditional meaning.
> Modal verbs are also called modal auxiliary verbs, modal auxiliaries, or simply modals. These verbs are a subcategory of auxiliary verbs , which means they cannot be used without a main verb. English has ten modal verbs.
> Recent work on tense and modals, in particular on modals in the past, has highlighted other forms of systematic ambiguity between the epistemic, abilitative and metaphysic interpretations. Grossly, the proposed accounts divide into three categories:

1. Syntactic views. Different interpretations are claimed to derive from different scope relations between functional heads (Demirdarche, 2005; Hacquard, 2006, Laca, 2008; Soare, 2009).

2. Lexical views. The interpretations that modals can have depend on the meaning of the tenses under which they are embedded and which vary across
Anonymous
Jul 13, 2015 22:23
@DamkerngT. This is controversial. One analysis (that presented in CGEL, for example) relates will/would, can/could, shall/should, and for some speakers may/might as plain present and past tense forms. It's clear that these forms are in alternation with one another, but it's also clear that the relationship isn't the same as between other present/past forms.
Anonymous
So some choose to analyze them all as invariant forms. Will and would separate.
In CGEL, they still treat model verbs as two forms, I guess?
Anonymous
Yeah, each of those modal verbs has two forms.
Anonymous
Could and can forms of the same verb.
Not sure if they call it tense or relate them to tenses somehow.
Anonymous
Jul 13, 2015 22:27
Yep. That contrast is tense.
Anonymous
It is true that they have no secondary (non-finite) forms, though, so they can't enter into construction with other auxiliaries like I've been *woulding like to have some pudding.
Anonymous
They can't be used as infinitive or gerund-participial complements.
nods -- Though I would have been something-ing is perfectly normal in English.
And English has I will have been something-ing too.
Though I'm not sure what would be the answer of What tense is this sentence in? for the two sentences above.
Anonymous
Jul 13, 2015 22:46
Yeah, because have and been have secondary (non-finite) forms.
Anonymous
Lacking secondary forms means that modal auxiliaries have to appear first in a verb group.
Anonymous
The four auxiliary slots are modal, perfect, progressive, passive in that order.
2
Anonymous
With all four filled, you get something like will have been being taken
Making sense outta will have been being taken
Anonymous
Jul 13, 2015 23:18
@DamkerngT. Use isn't an auxiliary in the English I speak.
Anonymous
It is for some people: "He usedn't to like it." (CGEL p.115)
Anonymous
But it doesn't really have all of the traits we associate with modal auxiliaries.
Anonymous
CGEL calls it the "aspectual auxiliary" use.
Oh! Hmm... what is it, then? A normal verb? -- Oh!
Anonymous
Yes. A lexical verb (for speakers like me).
Anonymous
Jul 13, 2015 23:21
As an auxiliary, it's a non-modal.
Anonymous
As for dare, that is basically not an auxiliary in American English
I wonder how CGEL would classify the tense of They used to be here.
Anonymous
You need to apply a syntactic operation that exposes one of the auxiliary traits.
Anonymous
Inversion, for example: %Used they to be here?
Anonymous
I'm honestly not familiar with the dialects where people say things like that―I've only read about them in books.
 
Conversation ended Jul 13, 2015 at 23:22.