Conversation started Nov 26, 2021 at 22:32.
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 26, 2021 22:32
@emanresuA who needs a repo when I have one right here
user image
5
Fmbalbuena
Fmbalbuena
----C----C----C----C----C----C----C----C----C----C
lyxal
lyxal
I present to you the largest fork chain you've ever seen
emanresu A
emanresu A
time to make a hilbert curve out of forks
Fmbalbuena
Fmbalbuena
@lyxal uhhh
caird coinheringaahing
caird coinheringaahing
Nov 26, 2021 23:25
@lyxal But what if you add another one?
Neil
Neil
@user I notice that nobody found their virginity in that box... no mine's not in there either
user
user
This is TNB
This is not a place people go to to lose it
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 26, 2021 23:45
@cairdcoinheringaahing it collapses on itself
user
user
What about if you shrink the forks first?
lyxal
lyxal
It's not based on size
It's based on relative fork density
You jam too many forks into a single area and it creates a black hole
user
user
Interesting, what if you make the forks out of something that's not very dense?
lyxal
lyxal
Still happens
user
user
@lyxal Uh, I'm not sure it works exactly like that :P
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 26, 2021 23:47
@user that's what I said too
@user material is irrelevant - it's all about fork like objects
user
user
But how do you define fork-like?
lyxal
lyxal
@user if it looks like a fork, sounds like a fork and walks like a fork it's a fork
user
user
Looks like is quite subjective. Do tridents count as forks? What about sporks?
lyxal
lyxal
It's just duck typing for forks
@user does a trident sound and walk like a fork?
user
user
Yes
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 26, 2021 23:51
Then it's a fork
user
user
What about sporks and spoons? What about sticks? I must know
lyxal
lyxal
Duck typing
Duck typing in computer programming is an application of the duck test—"If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck"—to determine whether an object can be used for a particular purpose. With normal typing, suitability is determined by an object's type. In duck typing, an object's suitability is determined by the presence of certain methods and properties, rather than the type of the object itself. == Example == This is a simple example in Python 3 that demonstrates how any object may be used in any context, up until it is used in a way that it does not support. Output...
Apply the criteria yourself
user
user
What if someone takes a robot, attaches a screen displaying a fork, makes its speakers produce fork noises, and makes its legs fork-like?
@lyxal i lzy
lyxal
lyxal
@user Then it's a fork
Alan Bagel
Alan Bagel
@lyxal How about a entity that can transform to anything in the universe, including a fork.
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 26, 2021 23:53
@AlanBagel depends on its instantaneous forkness
If at any time t it displays the three fork traits, it's a fork at time = t
caird coinheringaahing
caird coinheringaahing
@lyxal But there's no rule about making that area big enough to include the extra fork
@lyxal What about a fork in the road?
lyxal
lyxal
@cairdcoinheringaahing that's what I said too
@cairdcoinheringaahing does it look, sound and walk like a fork?
user
user
@lyxal How many is too many?
caird coinheringaahing
caird coinheringaahing
It doesn't walk
user
user
Neither do forks
caird coinheringaahing
caird coinheringaahing
Nov 26, 2021 23:55
It gets walked
lyxal
lyxal
@cairdcoinheringaahing then it's not a fork
@user you've never spent enough time observing them
user
user
@lyxal wdym, it walks exactly like a fork--not at all
@lyxal Get a life
Fmbalbuena
Fmbalbuena
CMQ: what is koth or King of the Hill?
lyxal
lyxal
@user it's a special constant called kciR's constant
@user this is just what I learned from my forks physics class
That's how I know about the fork density limit
A practical experiment gone horribly wrong
2 of my friends lost their limbs that day
How else do you think I got into the limb stealing business?
caird coinheringaahing
caird coinheringaahing
I thought you just got bored, like most of your themed shitposts :P
lyxal
lyxal
Nov 27, 2021 00:07
I mean sure there's that too :p
 
Conversation ended Nov 27, 2021 at 0:07.