> Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 is an autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like text. It is the third-generation language prediction model in the GPT-n series created by OpenAI, a San Francisco-based artificial intelligence research laboratory.
It (or something similar) powers a lot of the things like code autocompletion
gist.github.com/Lyxal/da8877ebed81e370ca476c5d243e3a6b (disclaimer: the dialogue I linked in the two gists contain text generated by OpenAI. After the indicated line, the text present is not at all representative of the respective users)
Write a C++ demangler
Ever look at an objdump and see gibberish like this?
_ZN3foo3bar3bazIRKPKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEE3barISt6vectorIP8_IO_FILESaISG_EEEEvSB_PT_RSo
This is a C++ mangled symbol (with the Itanium ABI) of the following beautiful function:
void foo::bar...
Yeah. We could repost and dupe hammer the old one into it but like, idk. i'd just like some feedback, even downvotes are better than nothing :p
i've prompted at least a couple times here (and I think specifically pointed to your answer to get any votes on it) and nothing's changed since like posting day
yeah. and the other point i think i mentioned at some point was that an interesting hello world will probably prompt discussion on it regardless and having no record as to what people are talking about or why makes context worse
a single onebox is much less space than the confusion from "wait why did people suddenly start talking about some weird language with literally no prompt"
the thing about logging is I can't nuke things out of logs, but that's not really much of a problem (or at least not something that would make logging disallowed) because I can't nuke messages out of (most) people's minds anyway if they've already seen it, and one can't really detect logging anyway
Oh, I didn't know you could do that. Good point, I wasn't even thinking about accidental (or malicious) sensitive information, just the "typical" spam and offensive stuff.
Unfortunately, a deleted message will show the last revision, and you can't edit a deleted message, so if you accidentally delete and forget to redact the message itself, you can no longer redact or purge its content.
So doing things in the wrong order will actually block you from redacting the content permanently.
@RedwolfPrograms I think that's expected behavior. I mean, it has been edited once, the important thing is just that you can't tell why
I edited it again, and it says "edited twice", and if you look at the history, it shows one revision and then "older data not available"
one thing I don't like about the purge history button is it doesn't come with confirmation, it just immediately applies
and unlike suspensions, it's not undoable (also suspensions aren't really either because they go on your permanent record)
gist.github.com/Lyxal/d0666ff7f02f35525632e7b2a506d32a (disclaimer: the dialogue I linked in the two gists contain text generated by OpenAI. After the indicated line, the text present is not at all representative of the respective users)
Just to be extremely very clear: the dialogue I linked in the two gists contain text generated by OpenAI. After the indicated line, the text present is not at all representative of the respective users
this is a pretty accurate reflection of CGCC. get access to a very good (top-quality?) AI and immediately use it to extend absolutely pointless funny conversations in TNB :P
I suppose to assist in lyxal wanting to protect their access and TOS agreement, if anyone is ever offended by any content produced by the AI posted here, feel free to ping me so I can airstrike it if lyxal can't anymore :P