@MartinSleziak When I hovered over the tag, I saw "0" followers and four questions; it looked like an asker creation of a new tag. Given it applies to only 4 questions, and that no one is following it, I think it's a far-fetched tag to add. So, e.g., do we need a tag <MichaelHardy> because far more posts concern Michael Hardy's complaints than do posts that refer to the \newcommand feature.
Do we need, e.g., for a tag <chat-stars> just to cover a rare question about starring comments in chat? Do we need a tag: <align>, etc.
ok, I thought you wanted to remove it from this question. Now I understand you want to remove it entirely.
@amWhy I think it is a useful tag, because issues related appeared several times in questions on meta and this make them easier to find. (Of course, this is a judgment call.)
BTW I would be perfectly ok with chat-stars tag, if we have enough question about them. For example, on meta.SE there are now more than 100 questions in the tag chat-stars.
