Conversation started Jan 18, 2013 at 0:14.
Jan 18, 2013 00:14
is this on topic?
0
Q: How to calculate some specific things about a disk?

user1890338I have this situation where I need to calculate some things. I have following things with me, Disk characteristics: number of cylinders; number of heads; # sectors/track; 10 ms average seek time; 3250 KBs transfer speed; 7200 RPM rota...

Jan 18, 2013 00:44
flagged it a while ago. "Needs punting over to serverfault or some relevant SE site – 39 mins ago"
Now it has an answer ;)
@ypercube "not welcome in our community"
Jan 18, 2013 01:01
Appalling behaviour for a moderator, in my opinion. Not the first time either
Wonders where the others are
@Phil Not the first time and won't be the last :/
-4
A: How to calculate some specific things about a disk?

mrdennyThere are so many variables that it's a crap question. Here's some questions for you to ask back to the teacher. What database platform? How much header information per page? per row? What's the database page size? Is the data in the database page compressed? If so what kind/level of compress...

Why is this so downoted?
"There are so many variables that it's a crap question."
It's a ranty answer, sure
The question is crap to begin with
In fact, I could rightly remove the quotes and just say... There are so many variables that it's a crap question.
:)
Jan 18, 2013 01:07
It's a homework question that belongs elsewhere. Doesn't mean the user should be torn to bits
As someone not that long out of college, and who had quite a few years in college (my first transcript featured a very respectable 1.3 or less, quite a feat, if you ask me) I can tell you that most students don't have a CLUE.
@Phil It doesn't belong anywhere
@jcolebrand Maybe, but if any of us had answered a question with "its a crap question", I would expect it to be appropriately moderated
So it should be flagged. A moderator has the power to close. Absolutely 0 need to post a rants answer berating the OP
5
and rightly so
If I wasn't still working at 1.10am I might make an effort to coax a good question out of it, because it does have some merit. It would however require a great deal of coaching the OP and an essay length response as an answer... none of which justifies beating up the new arrival
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells could certainly craft a good technical response to a reworked version of the question
It's meant as a simple undergrad 1st semester question by the looks of it. Not a SQL Server performance question :P
Jan 18, 2013 01:19
And while I'm on my soapbox, the rant about reading a random record is utter bull. WTF does he think IOP capacity is calculated from if not from rotational speed, latency and seek time?
Jan 18, 2013 02:02
@MarkStorey-Smith Yeah I didn't get that either
Or maybe mrdenny was being completely over the top because the OP said "Time to read one record randomly" instead of "average time to read one record randomly"
Badly phrased question all round but you can see what the OP was after if you cut them a bit of slack
Yeah pretty much, and mrdenny was basically "nope, no slack for you"
Well, I've successfully unfubar'd the DW prototype that I mercilessly fubar'd a couple of hours ago, so I'm gonna catch a couple of hours kip!
Cheerio
haha, night
Jan 18, 2013 02:32
@MarkStorey-Smith sorry, had to take that phone call.
So, I'm all up for deleting that particular question as having no useful merit
Sounds reasonable. Particularly since it's going downhill
Here's the thing:
"I need the formulae"
Those are in a book.
Or in the teacher's notes.
I would know, I've had plenty of classes.
 
6 hours later…
Jan 18, 2013 08:42
That answer looks very unpopular
Hi user1890338, as you can see from the question closure, as it stands this is off-topic here. It's not far off-topic but it is that side of the line (incidentally it is probably too broad too: we prefer one question at a time). The community is the best judge of these things, but I don't want you to be discouraged from asking future on-topic questions here: it seems likely that you will have them. I'd also like to draw your attention to the community response to the one answer you have received—it's normally our aim to be polite and respectful. — Jack Douglas 41 secs ago
@Phil, @MarkStorey-Smith, @jcolebrand ^^^^^
I think we have the right outcome here: the question closed and the answer firmly voted down.
 
Conversation ended Jan 18, 2013 at 8:43.