Conversation started Jun 28, 2022 at 18:54.
Jun 28, 2022 18:54
@BESW I informed Groody about your statement, Groody asks "For those of is lacking the long term relation with him, do you think he could post his findings to a meta?" — as far as I'm concered you did exactly that in your statment.
But if there is something that would help and not bother you much that springs to your mind, let me know.
@Akixkisu I dont see that BESW sourced any racist statements or sentiments from AngryGM, which is what I think Groody is looking for.
@ThomasMarkov that would be one way to do it, but maybe there is a better option that doesn't include directing traffic.
E. g. someone else sourced it, and we can direct them to that without directing to the source directly.
lol that's the same thing with an extra step
The estra step is the essential thing, Groody wants a pointy link.
As far as I'm concerned, and I doubt there are many who would disagree, BESW's statement is good enough.
Now, the pointy link could also be a blog post of someone sourcing the racist rhetoric, dissecting it in less or more detail. It certainly doesn't need to involve a bunch of new writing from BESW, who would need to go back to the source years after the statement to do such a writeup.
Jun 28, 2022 19:59
@Akixkisu I think a link opens up quibbling over what is or isn't ok when it was a pattern of content that was troubling
I, for one, trust BESW implicitly in this. — KRyan 2 hours ago
Jun 28, 2022 20:49
qpwoieurytureiwoqp
Jun 28, 2022 21:22
VTC system unspecified but pretty important: rpg.stackexchange.com/q/199557/1204
Jun 28, 2022 21:55
in Not a bar, but plays one on TV, May 28, 2020 at 11:57, by doppelgreener
The post that got AngryGM removed from the feeds was his post about COVID-19, in which he used racially charged epithets to refer to the virus. (And doubled down in comments, I might add.)
in Not a bar, but plays one on TV, May 28, 2020 at 12:00, by doppelgreener
However, this specific post is not the whole picture. Subsequently, moderators and room owners came to learn that over the past couple of years Angry GM has engaged in patterns of behaviour that are at odds with the values we strive to uphold in RPG chat: kindness and compassion in particular. Giving his posts a place in our chat feed would be at odds with those values, so he no longer has one.
 
Conversation ended Jun 28, 2022 at 21:55.