« first day (726 days earlier)      last day (4199 days later) » 

6:00 PM
The left is always red here, the conservatives-liberals blue.
 
Lavender = the pink-collar vote
 
@Cerberus same here
 
That's why we now have the fourth "purple" cabinet.
@MattЭллен Ah, right.
 
Green = Tremulous Treehuggers
 
Dark green is Christian conservatives.
 
6:01 PM
liberal democrats are yellow. the green party are green.
 
Light green is Greens.
 
man, i wish we had all these awesome parties
 
Medium green is liberal democrats.
 
Nobody is yellow. That would be Wrong.
But Gold is Good.
 
there are a bunch of smaller parties and the BNP, but I don't know about them
 
6:01 PM
Dark red are socialists.
 
@tchrist believe me, the liberal democrats are yellow
 
Wotless gunders and deserters, then?
 
Right-wing populists are light blue or orange—it is hoped that they will disappear as soon as they appeared, not deserving a fixed colour.
 
@tchrist isn't that what liberal democrats always are?
 
@MattЭллен Lies!
 
6:02 PM
Praps.
 
I actually think we have no yellow party.
We have two tiny orthodox Christian parties.
We have the Animal Party.
They are pretty colourless.
Then we have the "50+" party.
 
@tchrist essentially. They got into power via coalition and turned their back on their main manifesto objectives.
 
I find political parties to be the least fun of all the parties.
8
 
@Robusto Even the Animal Party?
One would think it consisted of party animals.
 
@Cerberus That could be fun, but not if it is political party animals.
 
6:05 PM
They are possibly the most annoying moralists ever.
Always trying to outlaw circus animals.
And I think their lobbying has actually succeeded.
 
@Cerberus Yeah, and what did circus animals ever do to them?
 
is that their main thing?
 
Sometimes it seems to be their main thing. It's hard to tell. They always whine about that. They also complain a lot about the way religious people slaughter their animals. One would presume their main point to be the bio-industry. I'm sure they complain about that too.
@Robusto I know, it's weird.
I really never got the circus thing.
 
Circus animals? Don't get me started! Coming into towns, stealing, vandalising, and the price they charge you to go on their rides. It's daylight robbery.
 
@MattЭллен Damn those Shriners!
 
6:09 PM
@MattЭллен True, true.
I wish the Animal Party would just ceterum censeo about the bio-industry all the time. They could actually be useful that way.
 
@Cerberus so they object to halal/kosher butchers? or is it something else?
 
@JSBձոգչ To the killing specifically, I believe.
 
@Cerberus so they object to all butchers?
 
And many other leftist parties do so too.
@JSBձոգչ No, only religious slaughter, because it is said to be too painful for the animals, as opposed to industrial killing, which is supposedly fairly painless.
Or at least very quick.
 
bizarre
 
6:11 PM
Now a compromise has been reached, as it always happens here.
 
> Well prepared for this Most Special Day, he had hedged his bets by loading up his cart with jolly lollies of both Raging Red and Boisterous Blue in equal measure, with a few bitter black licorice lollies held in reserve lest SCOTUS should once again be the Ultimate Deciders in the Greatest Nation’s Greatest Race.
 
When animals are slaughtered in religious slaughterhouses, a government official must be present to make sure it is done in such a way that the animal does not suffer beyond what is allowed by law, but the imam/rabbi will still preside the ritual in all other respects.
Or something.
@JSBձոգչ Yeah, I find it bizarre that it should be such a big issue.
The idea is that ritually killed animals are sometimes/often(?) stabbed several times, either because the knife is dull, or it is used incorrectly.
Whereas the right way involves a single, quick slashing of the throat. I think.
 
> In the United States, since the year 2000, the mass media have associated blue with the Democratic Party, even though the Democratic Party is a left-leaning party. In 2010, the party unveiled a blue official logo. In the United States, since the year 2000, the mass media have associated red with the Republican Party, despite the fact that the Republican Party is a conservative-leaning party. Since at least 2010, the party has adopted an all red logo.
> Purple is also unofficially used in the United States to denote a "swing state" (i.e., one contested frequently between the Republican Party, whose unofficial colour is red, and the Democratic Party, whose unofficial colour is blue.) It has also been used to reference Purple America, a term used in contrast to "blue" or "red", noting the electoral differences nationwide are observed more on discrepancies instead of unity.
Britain uses colors the other way.
Americans have no reason to follow how somebody else did things. That would require that they be aware of such, and they aren't.
 
but Americans associate Red with communism
or, at least, the 1980s did
 
Red State is a 2011 American independent action-horror film, written and directed by Kevin Smith, starring John Goodman, Melissa Leo and Michael Parks. For months, Smith had maintained that the rights to the film would be auctioned off to a distributor at a controversial event to be held after its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, but instead Smith purchased the film himself which, according to analysts, "might have been a difficult sale for any distributor." Smith originally planned to self-distribute the picture under the "Smodcast Pictures" banner with a traveling show in sele...
 
6:22 PM
@tchrist Everyone uses red for left.
The colour of socialism and communism.
 
@Cerberus Let me remind you: All generalizations are false.
 
Says Mr Red Mark.
You lefty.
 
The character means "dream" ... so, yeah, I'm a lefty.
 
How could I find the names of things used in a tram interior?
(with image)
 
Do French dogs barque all the time or only when they're on a boat?
 
6:43 PM
Jul 31 at 15:05, by Robusto
When you hit a French chicken in the stomach, does it say oeuf ?
 
Words of wisdom.
These are the important questions the millennial generation must answer.
 
If I could star it again, I would.
 
@Robusto thank you amazing! it helped. if only it could be more broad..
 
7:06 PM
@Cerberus Sorry. Not here. Not any more. Anyway, we have no Left, as well you know.
 
@Robusto Eeew.
 
The Republickers, however, do you like to talk about Red China, as though it were a slur.
 
How many e's in eeew?
Quick, or I'll post that as a question.
 
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?
!-2:s/you//
 
Santorum exploding in the South
 
7:14 PM
@Cerberus Which is precisely why we reassigned that erstwhile color of seditionists, insurrectionists, and similar traitors to God and Country to something else that could actually be used in this country: to cover the reactionary red-blooded Republickers raging to not just to rule but indeed to crush beneath their goose-stepping boot the unwashed proletariat.
More saints?
 
Hello everyone, guys and girls.
 
@Carlo_R. Is that three populations?
It could be, if there are no guys and girls here.
 
Meta, thank you. I thought girls are not guys. Sorry.
Surely, I'm confused on these words.
 
@tchrist Makes perfect sense.
@Carlo_R. He's just teasing you.
 
I have heard that in the past "girl" was for "boy".
@Cerberus thank you, so much.
 
7:22 PM
@Carlo_R. this is true
 
@JSB thank you, I'm happy to say something right.
However I recall (or remember) this fact, but how is it possible?
It is incredible that once time girls meant boy.
But I cannot ask on main site because waiwai suspend me for low quality contribution.
I'm the only one user that, de facto, cannot ask no longer question.
 
> c.1300, gyrle "child" (of either sex), of unknown origin; current scholarship [OED says] leans toward an unrecorded O.E. *gyrele, from P.Gmc. *gurwilon-, dim. of *gurwjoz (apparently also represented by Low Ger. gære "boy, girl," Norw. dialectal gorre, Swed. dialectal gurre "small child," though the exact relationship, if any, between all these is obscure), from PIE *ghwrgh-, also found in Gk. parthenos "virgin." But this is highly conjectural. And Liberman (2008) writes:
Girl does not go back to any Old English or Old Germanic form. It is part of a large group of G
it originally meant "small child", and was later specialized to mean "small female child"
 
@Carlo_R. Are you not able to ask questions anymore?
 
@JSB thank you JSB, I ever known that you are a serious person.
@Kit :) I'm under mobbing by waiwai. He/she suspend me often.
 
Oh. Well, you aren't the only user ever to be question banned.
 
7:30 PM
lots of people get banned. it's the hot new thing.
 
@Carlo_R. Don't spread falsehoods. Once != often.
 
@JSB and you was among my preference in moderator election, as you see in that sections.
 
Ivan has done his homework by editing in his research and more precise question, and is requesting that his question be reöpened:
1
Q: Uses of the word "lyrics"

IvanI have a doubt on the uses of the word lyrics. I would like to know how it is used by a native English speaker. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary says: lyric noun (also lyrics) the words of a song. Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary says: the words of a song ― often used in plural. So, ...

I don’t think there is anything wrong with the existing answer. But I think Ivan has done what we asked him to do.
 
@Kit but I see a lot of low quality questions. The fact is that I'm the only one to be suspended for this fact. But now I'm waiting for ELL, maybe there will be better.
 
@Carlo_R. Again, falsehoods. You are not special: you were not the only one suspended for that reason.
 
7:35 PM
Oct 24 at 15:06, by RegDwighт
Who else wants to get suspended by me? I promise to make it your most enjoyable suspension. Way better than what you'd get from Kit.
 
@sim I know that after a serie of low quality questions user are suspended, but in my case is different: I am suspended without the serie's prerequisite. Am I clear?
 
@Carlo_R. No, you had several crappy questions.
 
Crappy for you, but uncrappy for me and for the community.
 
@Carlo_R. The community closed lots of them.
 
And one my great question is still blocked.
 
7:38 PM
-3
Q: English flavour in this piece

Carlo_R.The following piece (1) is a comment of mine posted on Area51 site, and I'm wondering if my phrasing has a proper British or American writing style or if the Google translate (2) has a better one. (1)I only note that the Chinese language is an interesting exception, since in the last few year...

Closed by community.
Same with this
 
Yes, this question is too bad in its actual form. I know.
 
@Carlo_R. Then don't say waiwai unilaterally suspended you without cause
 
@Sim I just wanted to make sure you knew that we miss your scintillating contributions since you so valiantly stepped up to help shoulder janitorial duties. 😻 😈 😇
 
Things are not black or white, there is a gray scale too.
However, I will go to ELL in the future.
 
If you wanted to appeal your suspension, you could have. Bashing waiwai isn't the way to go.
 
7:43 PM
@JSB JSB, why do not you ask for make the moderator in ELL.
 
@Carlo_R. eh? i ran. i didn't win. no big deal.
 
not constructivates the whole bloody muddlework
 
My friends, my granchildren are calling me. I see you later. Thank you everyone.
 
@JSBձոգչ I had early disappointment in running for office. In 6th grade I ran for school treasurer and lost to a girl who had a cute skit. It was also the first year the 1st and 2nd graders were allowed to vote. I'm still bitter. ;)
@JSBձոգչ I like this idea.
 
user19161
Yo @sonic wassup?
 
I get some satisfaction of turning up and spoiling my ballot
 
Oh I see. Well, I don't feel that it is a choice between two politically intolerable alternatives, so maybe that's the difference.
 
@JSBձոգչ How can we get rid of the two party system, so that qualified candidates don't have to sell their souls to get elected? If serious candidates were given equal time on national t.v., and there were no party affiliation, maybe it would help, though how to distinguish between serious candidates and political trolls may pose a difficulty.
 
It just seems so silly to me (no offense JSB). Either get involved or stop complaining. Refusing to participate accomplishes nothing.
I don't like peas or carrots, so I won't eat. That will show them!
Well, except that no one will care if you are hungry.
 
@SpareOom The only way is to end the winner-takes-all system.
And introduce proportional representation.
 
8:12 PM
I am strongly in support of instant runoff voting.
 
What is that?
 
It ensures that candidates must be elected by majority.
 
That would be an improvement.
But...
Why not do it directly?
 
We've had plurality governors in my state for years. It's a big problem.
Do what directly?
 
Just add up all votes across the country, and whoever gets the most votes wins.
 
8:14 PM
If you don't have instant runoff, third parties are not truly viable.
 
I still don't understand what it is.
 
How does instant runoff work?
 
Similar to the EL&U elections. You rank the order of your choices.
 
In most countries, presidential elections are by proportional representation, and tiered.
Ah, so that's what it means. Sure, that's good.
It can replace a tier-based system.
 
It makes it possible for people to vote for third-party candidates without feeling like they are throwing their vote away.
 
8:16 PM
Yeah.
 
It also means that Gore probably would have won.
 
Or allow candidates to pool votes (we have that).
But I think p.r. is needed in any case.
 
It would be a good way for other parties to gain a foothold.
 
Sure.
But...
 
We are trying to get it done in my state because of the gubernatorial issue.
 
8:18 PM
Don't you think congressional elections should change too?
 
We regularly have three candidates and invariably, the least favored wins.
@Cerberus Yes. All of them should change.
 
@KitFox How can that happen?
 
If you have only two parties in Congress, will a presidential candidate from a third party stand a chance to organise enough support?
@KitFox OK.
 
@SpareOom The last governor had 39% of the vote. The other two candidates split the Dems vote.
 
Right.
That sucks.
Just introduce proportional voting in all elections.
 
8:20 PM
What's proportional voting?
 
@KitFox peas and carrots look nice together.
 
Don't they? Especially on a bed of rice.
 
All votes are added up, and seats are distributed based on what percentage of votes you got.
 
Ross Perot was the closest any 3rd person had to presidential victory because he was so rich. Any 3rd party (or independent) only takes from one of the major parties' candidate. Did I say that right?
 
Basically. That is how it is now.
 
8:21 PM
But you have districts now, don't you?
And the winner takes all in his district, right?
 
I like your proposal, @KitFox. Kit for whatever she's running for!
 
But that is because most people know that third-party candidates have no chance of being elected.
So they just won't vote for them because they've thrown it away.
 
But they would have a far higher chance if the winner didn't take all.
 
@KitFox Exactly!
 
i like @Cerb's idea, though i feel that most of the problems are really symptomatic of the pathologies in the underlying electoral system
 
8:22 PM
So if you just add up all votes, no votes are thrown away, except if your party gets less than the number required for a single seat.
 
namely: we have too many elections with too many people involved
 
@SpareOom But...if you thought that Nader wasn't going to be elected, but that your vote would go to Gore if Nader had no majority, you would be more likely to vote for Nader (first, Gore second).
 
so the polititians are constantly having to pander to the money or the masses
 
Isn't that unavoidable?
 
We need people who don't like politics to run the country.
2
 
8:23 PM
Which is why instant runoff is necessary (imho) for the development of a non-two-party system.
 
@KitFox For presidential elections, preferential voting is an absolutely great idea. Probably better than tiered.
@KitFox But don't you think a 3+ Congress is needed too?
 
We have a script that makes every commit fail because the connection with Rally is broken. We asked to have it removed. The word came back: DENIED. They want it there as a reminder that someone needs to fix the post-commit hook. But nobody has been assigned to that task. So every commit fails, and since we get used to auto-dismissing the failure messages, we miss actual fails. I call that failboating par excellence.
 
@SpareOom Very true.
 
@Cerberus I said that already.
 
OK.
 
8:25 PM
@Robusto That's beautiful. You should stuff it and mount it on your wall.
 
my crazy never-gonna-happen scheme is to drastically reduce the number of elections. the president gets one (1) ten-year term. the senators get 10 year terms, staggered into two 5-year blocks so that half the senate is reelected every 5 years. the house get any number of 5-year terms. these are designed to be long enough that the president and congress are free to undertake potentially unpopular moves if they have to, and he isn't constantly beholden to the next reelection cycle
 
> -10 User was removed
Another Nortonn clone?
@KitFox It is a keeper.
 
@Robusto admires the process
 
@JSBձոգչ Or you could take away power form the president. You don't need a presidential system.
 
@JSBձոգչ You could do it in a series of steps if you could get enough popular support.
 
8:26 PM
That much power in one hand is a lobbying magnet.
 
@Cerberus this is true, but that's even crazier and less likely to happen
we're more likely to turn the prez into an emperor than get rid of him
 
I suppose.
 
You'd have a hell of a lot of constitutional amendments to pass.
 
Perhaps it could be done gradually.
 
it could be done in one monster amendment
 
8:27 PM
Monsters!
 
Yeah, but that is less likely to succeed.
 
also, i want to eliminate direct election of senators, and have them go back to being appointed by the state legislatures
 
That's an interesting idea.
 
There is something to be said for less (direct) democracy.
 
@Cerberus yes indeed.
 
8:28 PM
Our senate is like that.
 
What if they were automatically the state senate majority and minority leaders?
 
But...
 
@JSBձոգչ This sounds like one of the stages of drunkenness.
 
@KitFox well that would be interesting. it would virtually guarantee a 50/50 party split in the senate
 
@JSBձոգչ And reasonably good, elected representation of everyone in the state.
 
8:29 PM
@JSBձոգչ Good point about long enough to do something (so that it's clear it belongs to their record too).
 
Also, the leaders have the most experience, so they would have demonstrated competence and knowledge (theoretically).
 
the downside is that no matter how thoroughly D or R your state is, your senate reps would still be 50% for the other guy
 
That's also the upside.
 
And again there is the two-party issue.
 
@KitFox yes, it does have its advantages
 
8:30 PM
	  "Mankind's Ten Stages of Drunkenness"

	0)  Sober
	1)  Witty and Charming
	2)  Rich and Powerful
	3)  Benevolent
	4)  Clairvoyant
	5)  Fuck Dinner
	6)  Patriotic
       *7)  Crank Up the Enola Gay
	8)  Witty and Charming, Part II
	9)  Invisible
	10) Bulletproof

* For the non-trivia buffs, the Enola Gay was the name of the B-29 plane
  used to drop the "A-bombs" on the Japanese at the end of World War II.
 
Our provincial legislatures vote for the senate. All votes are weighted and added up, and distributed among parties.
So the resulting composition of the senate is more or less similar to that of the lower house, but it is more indirect.
There is much less democratic/populist pressure in provincial elections.
 
@Cerberus this is effectively how the US senate used to be, but it was changed to a direct vote in the early 20th century.
 
@Robusto after a lot of efforts I have found the word you wrongly called "onomatopeia".
 
That combined with the indirect elections ensure that the senate is much more stable.
 
one of many bad ideas from the early 20th C progressives, who also brought us prohibition
 
8:32 PM
PHONESTHEME
 
@JSBձոգչ Hmm too bad. And again you have the winner-takes-all problem.
 
@Carlo_R. You know you make my knees tremble when you turn on the charm.
 
LOL. my local polling place is the shooting range
9
 
Who ever thought winner-takes-all was a good idea?
@JSBձոգչ How symbolic.
 
@Cerberus Winners.
 
8:33 PM
@Robusto Could be...
It is so bad.
 
@Carlo_R. How old are you really?
 
(I vote amidst hookers and pimps.)
 
i wonder if they allow me to fill out my ballot by shooting holes through the names of candidates i don't like
 
*pictures of candidates
Or life-like dolls.
 
Meta I'm really 80 year old. Oishi is 71 years old. I think I and Oishi are the oldest member.
 
8:36 PM
@Cerberus Pro tip: Move out of the red-light district.
 
Yay!
Zairja claimed to be older than 92.
@Robusto But I don't want to!
 
@Carlo_R. You share a single membership between you? Interesting.
 
a'ight, i'm off. see y'all tomorrow in the wake of the post-election apocalypse
 
Bai!
My polling station.
The door on the right.
On the left are some ladies.
 
Wait, that's the fuchsia light district.
 
8:38 PM
Yup.
 
@Robusto It is difficult to me the understanding of your last question.
 
@JSBձոգչ As long as you don't leave a hanging chad.
 
Gotta keep up with the trends in prostitution lighting.
 
@Carlo_R. Maybe because it is not a question.
 
but I see a question mark, not an interrobang.
 
8:40 PM
Later, folks.
 
Ciao!
 
@Carlo_R. The message you responded to is not a question.
 
@Cerberus Ciao. I'm happy to hear you speaking Italian. Ciao is right
 
Sometimes I look at my code and I wonder if maybe I have started smoking crack and I just don't remember it.
 
That is one of the side effects, or so I am told.
 
user19161
8:43 PM
@Robusto A rhetorical question is still a question. QED.
 
Next you will say that a dwarf planet is a planet.
 
@WillHunting Just what we needed: another non sequitur.
 
user19161
@KitFox Maybe you had more alpha brain waves when you wrote it.
 
@Carlo_R. Grazie!
Ma non parlo Italiano.
 
@Will Hello Jasper, I'm happy to hear from you.
 
8:44 PM
È troppo difficile.
 
user19161
@Carlo_R. So you just talked to your grandchildren?
 
Gettin' a bit strange in here. I'm out.
 
user19161
@JSBձոգչ The polling places here are almost always schools.
 
Bai.
 
@Will yes, and I have played with them.
@Cerberus Maybe you don't speach Italian, but your Italian is very good.
 
user19161
8:47 PM
@Carlo_R. Speak is the verb and speech is the noun.
 
I think we have a question on that.
 
user19161
I am thinking of lolspeak now.
 
1
Q: Why is it 'speaking' / 'speech' instead of 'speeking' / 'speech' or 'speaking' / 'speach'?

ChloeWhy is it "speaking" / "speech" instead of "speeking" / "speech" or "speaking" / 'speach'?

 
user19161
Just because. Justin Bieber.
 
What a disappointing answer.
Maybe I will offer a bounty on it.
 
user19161
8:50 PM
Great, and I will post my chat line as an answer!
 
...or maybe not.
 
user19161
Yeah save the rep.
 
@Kit great! Probabily native speakers are not precisely aware on the great help that ELU is. But, I think ELU is a great resource for people who want to learn English.
 
user19161
I know some users on another site who offered like 50 bounties.
 
I've never offered one.
 
user19161
8:51 PM
@Carlo_R. You mean probably and aware of.
 
@Carlo_R. Grazie mille!
 
user19161
@carlo My favourite Italian movie is Stanno Tutti Bene. I watched it over 9000 times!
 
@Cerberus in this case we answer "di nulla", but I'm not sure if there is an English equivalent. I hope you understand.
 
Si, capisco.
Isn't there some expression with "niente" too?
 
@Will Jasper, I love that film, but generally I think American films are not egualiable.
 
8:55 PM
De niente?
 
@Carlo_R. Gesundheit.
 
@cerb "di niente"
 
user19161
@simchona What?
 
@cerb "nulla" and "niente" are generally interchangiable in Italian.
@Will It sound detusche!
 
user19161
@Carlo_R. It is interchangeable.
 
8:58 PM
@WillHunting "Equaliable" sounds somewhat like either a sneeze or something caught in your throat
 
user19161
@Carlo_R. I think she meant that she did not understand egualiable. Gesundheit is said after one sneezes, meaning something like bless you.
 
@Will ahhh, yes inter+change+able
 

« first day (726 days earlier)      last day (4199 days later) »