« first day (2194 days earlier)      last day (2735 days later) » 

1:22 AM
It’s for whatever reason a lot harder for me to write something with as few words as possible deriving from French, Latin, or Greek than it is for me to write something with as many such words as possible, but I think the former is in some strange way more appealing.
When I don't think about it, of course, my normal expression is full of it. :)
It’s certainly less tedious to read. :)
Your outlander word 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒏 stretches things a bit as does calling a tongue we took more than half our words from one we’d nothing to do with. The Latin 𝒂𝒍𝒑𝒉𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒕 was written in England under Roman Britain, foredating even our Ænglisc tongue there. The selfsame Ænglisc Fuþorc came from overseas, starting in the Elder Fuþark which itself had in the fullness of time come to us from Italy, showing again that all roads lead to Rome. — tchrist ♦ 38 mins ago
Your imported term 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒏 dubiously extends the normal definitions by some meagre portion, just as does claiming a language we minimally derive fifty percent of our vocabulary from is one we’d nothing to do with. The Latin system was used for manuscripts in England under Roman Britain, presaging our own English language’s advent upon those green and pleasant lands. Even that Futhorc originated ultramar, produced from ancient runae ultimately acquired from Italy, demonstrating de novo that mille viae ducunt homines per saecula Romam. — tchrist ♦ 20 mins ago
 
 
8 hours later…
9:41 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer: "i.e." with "me", "myself", or "i"? by Masoud Vejdani on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
5 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
3:25 PM
> If you haven't got a fresh chicken, I'll take a frozen.
> If you haven't got fresh cream, I'll take canned.
Leaving out the noun (a frozen one, canned cream) is not unusual in informal speech, right?
 
@Færd The second is ok, the first seems to need one.
 
This test book too says the first sentence is 'wrong'.
What's the difference between them?
I would have thought (and honestly still do) that both are casually alright.
 
4:20 PM
@Færd That’s truly a most excellent question, my good sir!
 
4:36 PM
@tchrist This may help corroborate the "questioned" hypothesis in English Language & Usage's greatest shame:
8
Q: Abbreviation in a business letter

Penelope ForrestIn transcribing a business letter written in 1776, I keep finding an apparent abbreviation, 'qsd' with a line over the s, e.g "this to be qsd my brother." Can anyone tell me what this means?

QSND is just one letter closer...
I wonder if other lines were used for shorthand for other letters...
 
4:55 PM
@Færd chicken is countable (in this instance), and cream is a mass noun?
@JasperLoy re "I just realized that N really looks a lot like S". No disagreement there. But if you ever get the experience of changing a 3 month olds diaper, they're very close but not exactly the same. I could go into details. I'd rather not.
 
> If you haven't got a fresh chicken, I'll take a frozen chicken.
If you haven't got a fresh chicken, I'll take a frozen one.
If you haven't got a fresh chicken, I'll take one frozen.
If you haven't got a fresh chicken, I'll take a frozen.

If you haven't got fresh cream, I'll take canned cream.
If you haven't got fresh cream, I'll take the canned.
If you haven't got (any) fresh cream, I'll take some (of the) canned.
If you haven't got fresh cream, I'll take ?canned.
I'm looking for fresh cream, but if you haven't got any, I'll take canned.
I wonder why.
So.......
It turns out that this is a more interesting question than it might initially appear:
5
Q: Can to-infinitives ever be used after the verb “dislike”?

Soha Farhin PineCan to-infinitives ever follow the verb dislike? I know they can follow the verb like that way, but what about dislike? I ask because my school grammar textbook says the following: The verb dislike takes only the gerund form of verbs after it. There is something amiss about that sta...

One thing that’s interesting about it is that its answers, and most of its comments, turn out to be wrong.
Particularly when observed diachronically.
There may be a teaching point or two here.
One of those could involve actually running some quick fact-checks on one’s own feeling, hunches, and beliefs.
Another teaching point could be that until proper citations and references are provided, it’s just one person’s unsubstantiated assertion and guesswork.
Still another could pull in the concepts of recency illusions and locality delusions.
We’ve definitely got some curious cognitive biases in play here that are preventing folks from coming upon the right answer.
I guess the moral of the story is to always check your assumptions and to always document your assertions.
Some quantification through corporal research would also help in this instance.
> If asked why, in that case, we do not emigrate to Portugal, he replies that capitalists fear to send their capital into countries in which they are not resident, and dislike to go and settle in foreign countries themselves.
> Sinners dislike to go and work in God's vineyard, because of their prevailing love to carnal ease. Spiritual sloth is so sweet a sin, that the carnal heart is always in love with it.
Now, those are dislike to go and do something, which is something different from disliking going and doing something. Probably. But there are many, many, many clear instances from the 19th century where the infinitive complement is perfectly common, much more common in fact than the gerund complement.
> I very much wish to walk there, and particularly dislike to go in quite by myself.
> I certainly should dislike to go into another Regt. To be sure I could worry through 11 months most any way but I would rather go with the Boys.
> I dislike to go up there very much, the place is so lonely but I feel that duty demands of me to go even at the sacrifice of my own feelings.
> My old master and mistress to Virginia, had often threatend to sell me to the negro buyer from Georgia, for any trifling offence, and in order to make me dislike to go there, they would tell me I should have to eat cotton seed, and make indigo, ...
> It has pleased those philosophers who dislike to have an effect presented to their consideration without a cause duly assigned and certified, to ascribe my fragile health to a consumptive habit, and, having afflicted me with a 'pulmonary disease ...
> A novel would scarcely be distinguished from a book of travels, if loaded with a heavy commentary; and many readers not only dislike to have their attention called to the bottom of the page, but care little for the explanation thus offered them.
> As much as I dislike to have the jury running in and out I think this is important. It ought to be given a full airing in open court.
> In the first place, one would dislike to have other persons break the promises which they had made to oneself whenever they found it inconvenient to fulfil them. But this presupposes a certain aversion in oneself, which one no doubt correctly ...
> Some dislike to have it in the house anywhere. All salted provision must be watched, and kept under the brine.
> He assumes people like to be better paid than others, and dislike to be paid worse.
> Primarily because they instinctively dislike to be bossed. All men dislike to be bossed, employer and employee alike.
> I hope to be able to see you again, but fear not as I dislike to be asking for leave while here, and when I get orders it will be necessary to obey them at once. If I can go to see you without any neglect of duty, I will.
> Much of the Great Ones might be learnt in such regions, and those with their blood might inherit little memories very useful to a seeker. They might not know their parentage, for the gods so dislike to be known among men that none can be found who has seen their faces wittingly; a thing which Carter realised even as he sought to scale Kadath.
> Children dislike to be carried, or to be raised.
> They speak jeeringly of our wilderness of deceased elms, and sneer at our defunct magnolias. We hate to cast a reflection on the house, but we also dislike to be played for Chinamen when we are no such thing.
Most uses of dislike to VERB in the past century are triggered either by a parallel like to VERB nearby, or some other construction that requires an infinitive there, like dislike to go (and) see.
But in the century prior, it was more common to use the infinitive here than the gerund.
I wonder why I just now said century prior instead of prior century?
That one is Lovecraft, so we may perhaps excuse him.
> It is very questionable whether, if perseveringly confined for several hours together every day, it will not pine, to the injury of its health, so much does it dislike to be left alone.
I find myself like Janus here. It seems almost borderline ungrammatical today. But it was the rule not the exception in antebellum writings.
 
5:44 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin answer: Usage of "back" as a verb. Can we use "We will back soon"? by hossein173 on english.stackexchange.com
 
6:30 PM
@tchrist There is a problem with people's insisting that x never occurs.
When trying to corroborate a negative, one must be thorough.
 
I should hope that they would at least run some trivial checks against the alleged neverness. But had they done so they would have immediately discovered their assumption to be false.
Sorry about the diction; I keep reading antebellum texts. :)
 
I have experienced this very often.
I remember a discussion about at London where several people were 100% sure this construction was never used, even though I have seen it often.
Instead of limiting their claim to, perhaps, modern, non-formal usage in their own region, they maintain their absolutism.
shrugs
 
@Cerberus That is exactly it.
 
6:54 PM
@tchrist It was the natural question to ask, but merci!
@Mitch Yes.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:42 PM
0
A: Can to-infinitives ever be used after the verb “dislike”?

tchristIs “I dislike to go there” a wrong sentence? ᴛʟᴅʀ: Like like, historically dislike took a ᴛᴏ-infinitive not an -ɪɴɢ verb, but over the last century common usage has swapped those two preferences and now the ᴛᴏ-infinitive sounds distinctly odd to the modern ear. At the same time, dislike has also...

flees
 
8:57 PM
@tchrist Didn't think that my delete vote would be the binding one. Thanks for the tip on the mathematical bold italic set. You're a wealth of knowledge on unicode.
 
heh
sudo perl -MCPAN -e 'install Unicode::Tussle' && unifont This will get you you talked about. Notice how lame some are
            Double-Struck: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕨𝕚𝕝𝕝 𝕘𝕖𝕥 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜𝕖𝕕 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕥. ℕ𝕠𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 𝕙𝕠𝕨 𝕝𝕒𝕞𝕖 𝕤𝕠𝕞𝕖 𝕒𝕣𝕖.
                Monospace: 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝. 𝙽𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚎.
               Sans-Serif: 𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗀𝖾𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍. 𝖭𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾.
        Sans-Serif Italic: 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵. 𝘕𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦.
 
I suppose there's a fine line between "wealth of knowledge" and "fanatic"
 
My rep is a palindrome! 𝟠𝟜𝟠𝟜𝟠
 
mine is a zip code
 
9:14 PM
84848 is in Nebraska.
No it isn't. Hm.
Utah has the 84000 set
 
Somone needs to set up a webapp to take an arbitrary integer less than 10^15 (say) and list out any interesting facts about it
like primality, zip code, ramujan proved something neat about it, whatever
 
> 84500 - 84599
84600 - 84699
84700 - 84799
85000 - 85099
85200 - 85299
Apparently there's a hole in the universe of zip codes.
The interesting number paradox is a semi-humorous paradox which arises from the attempt to classify natural numbers as "interesting" or "dull". The paradox states that all natural numbers are interesting. The "proof" is by contradiction: if there exists a non-empty set of uninteresting numbers, there would be a smallest uninteresting number – but the smallest uninteresting number is itself interesting because it is the smallest uninteresting number, producing a contradiction. == Paradoxical nature == Attempting to classify all numbers this way leads to a paradox or an antinomy of definition. Any...
 
84848 is the zip code for Area 51.2
 
@tchrist Every universe needs somewhere to expand into.
 
yeah, I've seen that before.
but here the assumption is one can say something interesting about any given integer (less than N), so the paradox doesn't arise
 
9:20 PM
Year 848 (DCCCXLVIII) was a leap year starting on Sunday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar. == Events == === By place === ==== Europe ==== Summer – Bordeaux, capital of Aquitaine, falls into the hands of Viking raiders. King Charles the Bald sends a Frankish fleet to lift the siege. Despite destroying some Viking longships on the Dordogne River they fail to save the city. The Abbey of Saint-Pierre in Brantôme is sacked. Emperor Lothair I and his (half) brothers Louis the German and Charles the Bald meet in Koblenz to continue the system of "con-fraternal gov...
512 may refer to: The year 512 AD. The year 512 BC. The number 512. Several Ferrari cars: the 512 racing car, and the 512BB, 512TR and F512M road cars. 512 Taurinensis, a minor planet orbiting the Sun. The area code 512 (Austin, Texas area)...
Ok, that's how you write your service. :)
 
goddamnit onebox, you have one job
 
It’s the product of 5303 and two squared squared.
 
stares
 
stare not too long into the OEIS, lest the OEIS stare back at thee
 
9:27 PM
stares at the stayers on his stairs
 
10:18 PM
did an image search for stayers
 

« first day (2194 days earlier)      last day (2735 days later) »