@sandwich yep, it felt like a good chance to promote a product, but that's what the question asks for
@BrockAdams ditto. I thought it was saying date d+8 lol which I thought had some kind of sexual innuendo of some frustrated young programmer at some keyboard
FR: In metasmoke review, there is no way to skip a review. Only fp, tp and naa. So let's say there are 2 reviews, and you get the first one which you are not sure about, you cannot move to the second one. The "skip" button will then allow this (cc @Undo)
@Yvette Not really trolling, just a misguided, low-quality attempt to contribute. If the output of the interpreter were slightly different, the answer would be perfectly valid.
@SmokeDetector f (really low quality of answering the question, but answer follows code golfing answering format, and the code produces the correct answer. This is not spam or trolling, so it should be marked as false)
@Yvette He did do his work of making his answer follow the quilt lines that were pointed in the Q, and the source he used was 0 bytes large (so an empty file). And codegolf is known for allowing "exotic languages", as long as those languages are made before the question is created
@AshishAhujaツ [status-declined] use the scrollwheel ;)
@ArtOfCode Somewhat inclined to just tell him "Look, here's what's happened, if you can show you're able to get your invalidated % (link goes here) below x then ping us."
@PraveenKumar FYI, metasmoke is automatically ignoring your feedback now (you passed the 4%+4 threshold). It won't automatically go away, but you can see your invalid percentage here - you're completely welcome to ping Art or I if you can get your invalid % down significantly.
We could add an is_ignored attribute field to the Feedback model, and the default scope. Ignored feedback doesn't count against your invalid %, but it's not displayed or used, etc. Let admins manually unignore individual feedbacks, and the invalid % would come down.
Confirmation feedback is a great idea - check if there's ignored feedback on the post when you create a feedback, and if the current feedback is not ignored and the type matches, then unignore the currently ignored one.
@Undo, @ArtOfCode regarding this recent answer, I don't recall seeing any notice on MetaSmoke that most of that app's content is from SE. Did I miss it? :)
@BrockAdams it's attributed to the requirements, with links and all that. My reading is that if you attribute to full CC BY-SA standard, you don't need the content source notice because of the links
Debatable. But the TOS itself isn't clear; saying, "This requirement is satisfied with a discreet text blurb, or some other unobtrusive but clear visual indication." So you have some wiggle room when you get the inevitable CAD letter. :)
