[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Muscle Building by ShirleyBridwell on drupal.stackexchange.com…
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: TIPS FOR BODY BUILDING by thersom18 on gaming.stackexchange.com…
I have seen the replies not working correctly until the server has received the request, and accepted the chat message, then it says it is linked to the correct post
I make similar things like that too, for example marking a post as naa because it was suggesting an alternative way, instead of answering the Q of the OP
So what types of feedback get people confused most often? Self-vandalism I know, foreign language posts could probably do with some guidance. What else?
@ArtOfCode Self vandalism seems still be confusing, because people find it weird that its true, while the post should stay. Sometimes plagiarism is hard to see for people. I didn't see more other recent confusions
What is SE comes up with autoflags, it also need to know not to auto vandalism with a red flag, however the rollback of the post should remove the flag
vandalism is something we want to block at the system level, but it doesn't nicely fit in the current smokey architecture
[:30094076] Body - Position 1-157: <p>This can help in solving the problem </p>
<p>:<a href="https://rathoresaab.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">https://rathoresaab.wordpress.com</a></p> Blacklisted user - blacklisted for http://stackoverflow.com/a/37602506 (http://metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/posts/by-url?url=//stackoverflow.com/a/37602506) by http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/30084885#30084885
The "wingding" snowshoe troll is making regular appearances, but the frequency appears to be escalating. The last few days, there have been a few incidents per day; today, we are already up beyond half a dozen.
Recent stats: https://metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&title=&body=&...
@sandwich I can't disagree with either of those courses of action. My question, though, is about the guidance we are providing on plagiarism. I don't think that falls in our scope to detect. If we happen to find a user that is copying other answers and adding inappropriate links, we should deal with that as appropriate, not as plagiarism
Any objections to replacing github.com/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/blob/master/… with message_parts = re.split('[ ,]+', content_source)? This will fix two minor issues: !!/report url (two spaces make empty argument) and spam, because blah (not recognized).
