« first day (1935 days earlier)      last day (3054 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

9:00 PM
@GlenH7 I just don't care enough to put up with some a vendor spiel for a franchise I never bothered with
 
user41796
fair 'nuff
 
user41796
"Down in front already!"
 
myfunction <- function(arg1, arg2, ... ){
statements
return(object)
}
well now I just feel dumb
that's bloody easy
 
neat, I got the Batman hat
 
user41796
@Ixrec - thanks for asking the follow-up MPSE question regarding the experiment
 
9:04 PM
I'm glad it seems I'm not the only one who felt that way
 
user41796
There does seem to be a serious disconnect with what the regular users of the community are here for and perhaps what SE expects
 
and we even got an answer from Jon about it
Just a quick note: we don't have any particular end game here. The experiment was something Shog mentioned and I took up the baton. If I had one goal that might not be obvious from what I already wrote, it would be to encourage self-examination. So I'm grateful for this question. I really don't have any answers, however. — Jon Ericson ♦ 1 hour ago
 
user41796
Yeah, that further reinforced my belief that he started up this experiment in good faith
 
I'm actually feeling a lot better about the situation today just because we finally got that comment from him
a straight, honest answer helps so much
 
user41796
I didn't think we're at any existential crisis point, but I am disappointed in the degree of disconnect regarding the site
 
9:08 PM
yeah, I was worried about that but I didn't think we were actually there
the disconnect disappointment has pretty much been a constant for the past month or so
 
user41796
Part of me feels it's a bit hypocritical of SE to say "loosen up" when it was SE that mandated the site's scope needed to pull a 180. And I dislike pointing to the remaining NPR crowd as a means of saying "look, some of the community want that subjectivity."
 
I have been tempted to invoke those exact arguments and consciously chose to avoid them for the time being
 
user41796
I can empathize with that decision.
 
user41796
I really don't like calling out names in cases like that, but you don't really have any other choice.
 
@Ixrec I was right there with you. Frankly I don't find his comment particularly encouraging. Sounds like a first-warning a child gets from a teacher "You're not in trouble, I would just encourage you to do some frank self examination"
 
user41796
9:11 PM
> So-and-so wants those types of questions because so-and-so sees absolutely nothing wrong with the NPR type questions.
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa Nah, that's not at all how I read it
 
I was hoping the response would be a bit more jovial - as for self examination, the whole thing was a practice in him examining us.
 
user41796
Otherwise he wouldn't have said "I really don't have any answers, however."
 
in all fairness, it did prompt more self-examination than usual
 
user41796
We are a bit of a black sheep from an SE perspective
 
9:12 PM
> P.SE: Really? I... I have good content on. I, also...
> Jon: Well, okay. Having good content is the minimum, okay?
> P.SE: Okay.
> Jon: Now, you know it's up to you whether or not you want to just do the bare minimum. Or... well, like SO, for example, has thirty seven billion open questions. And a terrific traffic quotient.
 
user41796
The S:N ratio is crazy high; we have an exceptionally active community; we don't tolerate crap that is perfectly normal for other sites.
 
user55340
The thing that is worrisome for many sites is that it is depending on a rather small group to do much of the moderation for the site. The first part of that is the "this is a small group" - when one of us takes a vacation the queue has a notable blip.
 
user41796
@MichaelT Most definitely this
 
user55340
We also have difficulty using the tools as they are metered to properly guide new users - either by closing, duplicate, or migrating the questions when necessary.
 
I still feel a bit guilty for letting my close vote queue get so high
 
user55340
9:14 PM
Having a question remain open for too long is counter productive when it really should be closed.
 
lately I've wanted a way to filter the review queues by how recent the question is
 
user55340
@Ixrec 10k tools, close tab, recent votes, 1 day.
 
there's probably not much point closing a question from 2 years ago with zero activity on it, unless we suspect it'll become a broken window
@MichaelT wow, why didn't I think of that
wait, no, that's close votes cast today, isn't it? not close votes on questions asked today
 
user55340
Or 10k tools, stats tab, most negatively scored.
 
user55340
@Ixrec the majority of the votes are on today's questions.
 
9:17 PM
hey Luther is really good
 
hm, true
 
user41796
@Ixrec correct, close votes cast today
 
just finished S1
 
the review queues show a totally random order of "unfinished" tasks, right?
 
@GlenH7 Really? Since when?
 
9:17 PM
this "never going to the pub" lark is turning out really great
 
They actually care about something other than SO?
 
user41796
@Ixrec No. Oldest to newest based upon close vote
 
@Ampt I assume since we were created; NPR was always meant to be an outlier
@GlenH7 weird, sometimes when I duck out of the queue and come back later it shows me a totally different question from the one I left off on, even if I only left for a few seconds, so I assumed it was just randomized
 
Mmmm I'm pretty sure we're one of many SE sites that doesn't bring enough money to keep the lights on, and so long as we don't totally devolve into anarchy they don't pay us much heed.
 
user41796
The theory being that questions with the oldest close votes run the highest risk of the votes expiring off. So they get bumped to the front of the queue
 
9:18 PM
makes sense
 
user41796
@Ampt That argument could likely be made for every site except SO
 
user55340
The other thing to do is go to the close vote review history, find things that aren't closed, and act on that review.
 
@GlenH7 Which is why we aren't unique
I think we're as much a black sheep as Gaming or Math
We're all just sites under the SE umbrella, for better or worse
and the SE umbrella is graciously held by SO, who calls the shots
 
user41796
To go out on a limb, I sometimes get the feeling that SO is viewed as the money maker and the rest of SE is viewed as being there merely for a lark and to keep the eyeballs around.
 
user41796
Don't over-read that analogy
 
9:20 PM
@GlenH7 that's not a limb, it's a tree trunk.
and it's held up by cement and steel
 
user15026
@Ampt Gaming is definitely some sort of sheep.
 
user41796
@Ampt with a nice deep anchoring?
 
and also built in the bottom of a valley where literally nothing can go any lower
 
user41796
But continuing that analogy, since the other SE sites are just for fun, it's a bit anathema to them to consider that a site is being used for professional purposes.
 
I just don't want anyone here to get the delusional idea that we are unique or special or whatever you want to call it - we're just another SE site with all the joys and suffering that comes with it
@GlenH7 And Workplace is just for your imaginary job right?
 
9:22 PM
@Ampt Oh I dunno, most SE sites have well-defined topics. We're pretty special.
@GlenH7 In what way is that not obviously true?
 
I do believe we have unique challenges in terms of content moderation, but yes we don't have any more or less clout than any of the other non-SO sites
 
@Ixrec That's my point. Every site has unique challenges in terms of content moderation.
 
user55340
Every site has its unique history that is necessary to understand to figure out where they are now and the direction they are headed. Trying to have one set of rules for all of them doesn't work very well.
 
Having one set of rules per site works quite well, though. Programmers.SE should try it.
 
Look at Math, they've completely devolved from the question answer format to a more "Student/Teacher" Dynamic
 
9:23 PM
@Ampt I think there are some sites for which most content is okay by default and it's fairly rare that any non-trivial moderation even has to happen
 
AKA if we don't feel your question is worthy, we don't asnwer it
 
@Ampt I hate that :( It's like .. go make your own site
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit I'm not a fan either, but it goes both ways. They have their own site scope and deviances from SO as we do.
 
user41796
No, no, that should be:
 
user41796
> HINT: go make your own site
 
9:25 PM
@Ampt It's still supposed to be a Q&A.
 
And we're not supposed to form voting blocks or be curmudgeony assholes
 
@Ampt And we're not supposed to cast unfounded assumptions of criminality, or call each other horrid names...
 
Not defending them, just saying that they get their grey zone from the same pool we get ours from
 
user41796
Name calling is bad
 
if we crack down on the rules on them to a T, we also have to crack down on ourselves
 
9:26 PM
Then stop calling me names
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit who's calling you names?
 
who's accusing who of what now?
 
@Ampt I believe you called me a "curmudgeony asshole"?
 
I think he was referring to us
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit LOL I was referring to all of the regulars in here
 
9:27 PM
the "cabal"
 
@Ampt That doesn't really make it any better.
 
myself included
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Yeah, sorry, mate. But that's a term of endearment reserved for the cabal.
 
And calling yourself names, well that's grounds for serious disciplinary action!
 
calling yourself names is totally acceptable
 
9:28 PM
So are you saying that your "cabal" is a voting block? Presumably that is some sort of admission of mass voting fraud?
 
user41796
We're always happy to welcome new members to the cabal, it just takes a bit of diligence with reviewing the close review queue
 
And some hazing, I'll bet
 
Well, there is a room where people post poor questions in the hopes of getting additional cclose votes
 
Something to do with mixing coffee and scotch
 
or they could just do the review queues
 
9:28 PM
and for the most part that's accepted in the name of high quality
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit That's more of a reference to the contradictory guidance we've been given on down voting
 
because most of the questions are crap
 
there's a few active close voters I almost never see in here
 
@GlenH7 Hm what guidance have you received folks
@Ixrec gnat
 
Snowman I haven't seen lately, that new guy Scant Rogers I've never seen in here, someone seems to have chased gnat off
 
9:29 PM
Scant Rogers is scant here
 
indeed
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit he's been absent of late, but I would definitely lump him into the cabal
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit When asking for additional close votes before in order to keep the front page unpolluted, we were told to heavily down vote stuff to take it off the front page.
 
he's definitely a presence in here
 
gnat is still active in the cv-please room and in his infamous comments
 
9:29 PM
@Ampt I was responding only to the comment that he's rarely in here
 
user41796
But then we were also told not to down vote things just to get roomba to clean things up
 
He's obviously hugely active on the site itself, which was the point
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit fairly new close voter for the site
 
(And by "active" I mean "posts lots of 'recommended reading'")
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit And I'm saying that that's a fairly recent development. He used to be in here as often as I was
 
9:30 PM
@GlenH7 yes Ixrec said that
@Ampt ok
@Ampt did he get too Ampt up?
 
Too much Red Bull actually
 
the only thing that comes to mind is when Robert and gnat had a tiff the other day
 
user41796
gnat goes through cycles of activity in here.
 
@Ixrec gnat has very unique ways of dealing with bad content, that may seem harsh to some
 
that's a debate we should probably have at some point
 
9:31 PM
I applaud him for standing his ground and providing a stationary viewpoint on the subject
 
user41796
@Ixrec Did that get cleared up?
 
not necessarily right now
 
Can someone link me?
 
@Ampt recommended reading: the transcript
 
@GlenH7 "cleared up"? I haven't checked if the transcript was deleted if that's what yo mean
 
9:32 PM
@Ixrec tiff's are the worst; who came up with that stupid format? "oo I'm high resolution! oo I'm good for printers! oo no one can open me without gulping their entire ram bank down!" bah! Stupid tiff!
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit That's this conversation
 
@JimmyHoffa gif off my lawn
@Ampt *whoosh*
 
user41796
And gnat has changed up his pro-forma comments when better alternatives have been suggested. Likewise, he has changed his dupe voting behaviour when asked.
 
It's every conversation.
 
Well I meant the one with Gnat and Robert, but I suppose this one works just as well...?
 
9:33 PM
@GlenH7 did he change his dupe voting behavior recently? or was that an old thing I don't know about?
 
user41796
older thing
 
@JimmyHoffa do you even use regular stars anymore? :P
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit if you mean site moderation is the topic of a significant number of our conversations well .. yeah. Welcome to The Whiteboard; we care. If we didn't, why would we drink so much scotch?
 
...
 
@Ampt The point was that my comment deliberately resembled gnat's comments. I know what the transcript is. Just.. never mind...
 
9:34 PM
@Ampt why would I? I have super stars, hell to sub-standard stars.
 
@JimmyHoffa I suppose you have a point
 
@JimmyHoffa That's not what I meant at all. I was confirming that I know what the transcript is (and pointing out the definition to Ampt, who seemed to believe it was only a record of this conversation)
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Ampt: 1 Jokes: 0
 
Boy did this derail fast
 
Another One Bites the Dust
 
9:35 PM
I think you'll find the joke won there
 
Nah, this is like a ouiji board - no one person derails it
 
@Ampt to be sure - when there's a pinned comment of any relevance at all - I tend to make sure it stays aloft for a while. We just haven't had one in some time.
 
Chatboard whiteroom invictus!
 
@Ampt ouija
 
besides, I can only ever see 2 stars at a time and those are pinned, so stars don't mean anything to me
 
9:36 PM
ouiji sounds like an estranged cousin of Luigi
 
@Ixrec IS A GHOST! BURN HIM!
 
@Ampt wait wait; is he heavier, or lighter than a duck?
 
@JimmyHoffa Well... I don't know
 
@JimmyHoffa as long as he walks and talks like one, who gives a #uck
 
last time I checked I'm heavier than a duck
 
9:37 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit a duck? is it a duck?
 
you actually weighed a duck?
 
oooh the suspense is killing me
 
@Ampt yes!
Ampt: 1 Words: 0
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit no, he sat on one and it floated to the top, so he knows he's heavier.
 
@JimmyHoffa ok makes sense
 
9:38 PM
I tried asking here how to write a Python script to weigh a duck, but they downvoted me so I went to Quora
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Pretty sure that puts me at 2 bud
Ampt: 3 Math: 0
@Ixrec I'd go look but I don't want to make an account just to see your duck.
 
haha the notification "twang" just rang out during a quiet part of The Hanging Tree. good thing is it was PERFECTLY in tune and in time as a bit of bass :D
 
Ampt: 4 Music: 0
 
@Ampt Bud is terrible. It's like 80% water. So you can keep both.
 
@Ampt I am not being entirely serious
 
9:39 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit All light beers are
 
@Ampt only in the states
 
@Ixrec You said it, so it must be true. you can't lie on the internet you know
that's against the law
 
also that's not a light beer
 
@Ixrec neither was Ampt, he just turns off the hider-div when he wants to read something behind one
 
otherwise, spot on
 
9:40 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Whatever you tell yourself bud
 
@Ampt I am not a Bud, pal!
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit good; that stuff's terrible. I think I'll go add Brass Monkey to the whiteboard recipes now...
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Bud is usually Bud Light unless you're in the middle of a cornfield.
also, I'm not your pal, bro.
 
@Ampt According to most Americans, 10/10 would be in a cornfield again.
 
@JimmyHoffa Doom Bar mate
 
9:42 PM
fortunately, I am not most Americans, so I still weigh more than a duck
 
@Ampt just because it has "Light" in the name doesn't actually make it an actual light beer
 
@Ampt did the ghost just call us witches?
 
they use it to mean "this has nothing in it" or somesuch
heh, a bit like how Programmers.SE has almost nothing to do with programmers
you guys should change the name or something
 
user41796
@Ixrec most Americans weigh quite a bit more than a duck too
 
Where did they put that kick button again?
 
9:43 PM
@GlenH7 you're forgetting that most American ducks are really really really fat
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit if you can talk SE into trying it we'd be very grateful
 
@Ixrec ok on it
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit You saw that maple_shaft suggested that, right?
 
go make a meta post
 
arguably maple did already
 
9:44 PM
@GlenH7 Um yes, maple_shaft and like ten other people, myself included
you guys suck at irony
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit No, no in meta
 
no in meta, mesa in chat
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Of course we do. We're not British. :-)
 
no hay programmers
@GlenH7 I'm sorry
 
hang on, I missed half the exposition in this DW episode, need to focus on it for a minute
 
user41796
 
Can we get back to talking about the name change?
 
user41796
I'm not convinced it's all that good of an idea
 
user41796
derp-mash-keys-text-box crowd doesn't really care about domain names
 
@GlenH7 That only suggests changing the domain name. I'm talking about changing the whole site identity, so including the content of the <title> tag, for example.
 
user55340
I'm not opposed to a name change, just think that it won't do one bit of difference to the questions we get, and I don't think its worth the effort necessary to expend to get SE to do it.
 
user41796
9:47 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit yeah, probably ought to get rid of the cabal too
 
you're assuming derp-mash-keys-text-box crowd start out here, rather than finding us by doing a google search with the word "programmer" in it
I think it's likely several of them are the latter
 
yes
it would at the very least be ethical to not have a name that completely misrepresents you, when you're closing every other question
I can't imagine many leave here with a happy feeling
 
user55340
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Stack Overflow would too if they had the votes to do it.
 
@MichaelT we do
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Apparently it's as high as 3 out of 4 questions, not just every other
 
9:49 PM
but we do it ethically!
dupehammer best hammer
 
user55340
We need people to put another 50 - 80 answers in to get a dup hammer for one language tag.
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit If the cabal active users weren't so far from a golden badge, I'd welcome unleashing dupe hammers here
 
user55340
The other thing is that the crappy questions are rarely tagged with tags that are dup hammer likely.
 
I wasn't suggesting it for here.
I was saying I love it on SO.
 
dupehammer is largely an SO-exclusive tactic, as gold badges are so rare on any other site
 
9:51 PM
I guess I'm trying to subtly point out that I am hardly new to SE and I know how all this stuff works.
 
user55340
Our silver tag badges are: and
 
Even though I'm not in your vote fraud cabal. :)
 
user55340
Thats it.
 
psr
@LightnessRacesinOrbit programmers [on-hold]
5
 
user41796
9:52 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit You don't say?
 
yes yes yes yes that is amaze
 
user55340
Top user in - thats Doc, with 118 answers.
 
> This website is On Hold as unclear what we're asking you to ask.
 
I'm close-ish to a bronze badge in ...that's kinda it though
 
user55340
has Telastyn at 145 and Doc at 133.
 
9:53 PM
ok I thought I might get a star or two out of that :(
 
user55340
has DeadMG at 136.
 
lol DeadMG
you know he's a lounger right?
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit yup
 
user55340
Yep. The thing is, no one else is even 50% of the way to a gold badge in c++.
 
9:53 PM
ahaha I so funny
 
psr
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Not explicitly, but he did seem a bit off.
 
user55340
has Martjin Verburg (inactive) at 163, me at 113, and Kilian at 100.
 
user55340
And no one has even 100 answers in
 
I still stand by my request from 3 years ago about making our site less ridiculous looking:
25
Q: Would you like to see Programmers get a less playful/cartoonish design to attract professional questions?

Jimmy HoffaAll the scribbly-doodles and the cartoonish font on Programmers seems to me like a reason people might assume from the start that this site is for more chatty non-professional questions. Would it be worthwhile to try and get the site redesigned? Do you think this would cut down on low-quality qu...

ugliest site in the SE network...
they did make some enhancements to it though, like 2 years later
 
user55340
9:56 PM
It would take a couple weeks of effort to write non-crappy answers sufficient to get to a gold badge for me... and there are no java tagged questions that are dup eligible in the last 50. Some crappy ones... yes... but the gold badge doesn't help with crap.
 
psr
@JimmyHoffa Maybe a guy in a suit being interviewed at a whiteboard by 12 people, sweating bullets...
 
the bad questions generally have bad tags too
 
@Ixrec as proven by my tag ranking SEDE query recently
 
user55340
I'll point out Mark's answer in there is still the one that I agree with:
 
user55340
> This just seems like another attempt to pass the buck on dealing with poor quality questions being asked, much like the repeated attempts to get the site's name or tagline changed. If only it were that easy. No: poor quality questions keep coming in because people keep upvoting them and answering them, and they're not doing that because the theme of the site is "cartoonish".
2
 
9:59 PM
very true
 
user55340
Or from Dori in another post:
 
user55340
> The problem isn't generic accounts.

The problem is only partly bad questions.

The real problem is that some part of the community loves bad questions.

For example, user 'Mareer' showed up today and immediately created two heaping piles of crap:

Is it difficult to learn Ruby & Ruby on Rails?
Slow and Steady Wins the Race?
which got 2 upvotes and 1 answer, and 3 upvotes and 3 answers, respectively.

I looked at these questions, noted their familiar style, and did a check on the IP. Unsurprisingly, it was the same as that of yesterday's low-quality winner, user25244, so I've now merged t
 
how do we stop them though? those are exactly the users that never visit meta or chat or anywhere else we can talk to them
 
user55340
Close the poor questions, down vote them, delete them.
 
user41796
@MichaelT Was Mareer a goma puppet?
 
10:00 PM
@MichaelT I think it's fairly obvious that isn't working
 
user55340
@GlenH7 yes
 
27
Q: Why is Sound sparingly used in websites?

Amit JainIn an application like Skype for example, there is a thoughtful sound design that compliments the user experience - for example, when an user logs in/out. There are multiple examples of such interfaces, but quite a few that you can think on the websites that we come across regularly. We perform a...

pass the shotgun
 
@MichaelT I just don't see evidence of that. I think if we tried something different we would have some idea of the truth of it. That said, there really is no "trying" any of the solutions proposed. It's all a pointless argument.
 
user41796
Those question titles screamed of goma
 
user55340
10k link: meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/a/1602/40980 takes you to another 10k link: programmers.stackexchange.com/q/77079/40980 which is a goma question.
 
10:01 PM
@GlenH7 oh goodness; the days of yore...
 
indeed, only SE can try any of them...all we can do is close more or close less
 
@Ixrec By renaming the site.
 
a name I haven't heard said since long were the days
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Scotch.Coffee
 
@MichaelT tease
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit you missed the "we" in the question
 
user55340
10:02 PM
@LightnessRacesinOrbit first one is fully in the text above. Second one isn't worth clicking.
 
@Ixrec oh c'mon, you have no hacking powahs?
 
I have a feeling SE would notice if I hacked the site name to something else
 
user55340
@LightnessRacesinOrbit the answer that I quoted is.
 
user41796
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really missing anything on that particular one
 
10:04 PM
YOU COULD BE LYING FOR ALL I KNOW
there could be gold there, gold!
 
user55340
Unfortunately part of the "close, down vote, delete" is something that makes the site boring to NPR and is likely to discourage them and they may leave the site completely. I would contend that failure to do that discourages the people who are trying for that site.
 
user41796
Not Programming Related
 
user55340
Not Programming Related - the original name for P.SE.
 
user41796
10:07 PM
aka. Rhe dark days. The bad days. That to which we shall hopefully never return.
 
user55340
Where one could ask questions like "what is your favorite chair, as a programmer" or "what is your favorite programming cartoon?"
 
user55340
110
Q: What's your favourite quote about programming?

GelatinWhat's your favourite quote about programming? One quote per answer, and please check for duplicates before posting!

 
Nov 14 at 19:40, by Ixrec
my favorite is still "Do you have to eat pizza to be a successful programmer?"
 
user15026
There was also one about naming someone's cat.
 
@MichaelT Ironically, both of those are related to programming. See, right from the start, this site has had no idea what it is.
 
user41796
10:09 PM
@Ixrec Yes. Even if you're lactose intolerant.
 
user55340
@AshleyNunn and the patron saint of programming.
 
user15026
@MichaelT I vaguely recall that one.
 
@LightnessRacesinOrbit I would agree NPR had no idea what it was about, since it was defined as being not about something; that has nothing to do with the current scope though
 
user55340
@LightnessRacesinOrbit When SE created it, they had the idea of "its the place for all the crap that we don't want on SO."
 
user15026
(aka I've been lurking around here for an awful long time for not being a programmer.)
 
10:10 PM
oh my god guys yes I know I'm joking
goodness me
@GlenH7 um I think you mean "lack toast and tolerant"
 
Poe's Law
 
user41796
@AshleyNunn Don't worry, we'll draw you into the dark side. You've already got the cookies.
 
user15026
@GlenH7 Well, not anymore, my family ate all my last batches of cookies
 
user41796
@AshleyNunn Then you'll just have to join us on the dark side since we have cookies.
 
user15026
@GlenH7 I see how it is....
 
user41796
10:12 PM
@AshleyNunn cookies!!!
 
That's why I like to refer to my job as enbugging. — deceze Sep 13 '10 at 2:02
 
user15026
I do like cookies. Your offer is tempting.
 
user41796
10:41 PM
Today's evidence that recruiters suck...
 
user41796
Got two emails at my work address today from the same recruiter. First offer is for an IT role in no-name-town TX. Second offer is as a entry level dev in Phoenix.
 
user41796
I was almost tempted to ask where the recruiter got my contact info from but quickly realized it wouldn't be worth my bother.
 
11:04 PM
R is fun.
I am totally going to end up csv exporting half of SEDE just to make visualizations with R
 
it's been a long time since I worked with R, I have a feeling I'd appreciate it much more now
 
That basic acceptable Q link on my SEDE queries meta post is a great starting point. SEDE exports to CSV and R can read.csv(file path)
 
11:54 PM
Incidentally, I just stumbled upon a way to de-anonymize rage quitters data in SEDE
 
user55340
Comment replies to someone who hasn't commented?
 
user55340
> Something. --Bob
SomethingElse. --User123 (anonymized)
@Charlie that too. --Bob
 
user55340
There's also the situation of:
 
user55340
> Post by User123
-- Comments --
Something --Bob
@Charlie you will need to update this to address Bob's issue. --Dale
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (1935 days earlier)      last day (3054 days later) »